Search results

sedeagpd.gob.es 5/7 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter te, LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR, typified in the Article 83.5 of the

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

the top of this document. Likewise, in accordance with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of the LPACAP, you are informed that, if it does not make allegations in time

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

set out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (LPACAP). In accordance with Article

out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

verified that no allegation has been received some by the DGP. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

of the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP, the agreement to initiate PS / 00227/2020 is considered Pro- Resolution

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

out in Article 64.2(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

Determining the amount of the penalty is an obligation imposed by article 64.2 of the LPACAP and then point out that “not only are the requirements mentioned,

2/7 with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations (LPACAP), by not carrying

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of thePublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Article 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, are applicable, which in section f) establishes

Consequently, dated June 17, 2021, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

as set out in Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administration (LPACAP). In accordance with

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

Page 11 11/14 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

proposal of resolution, according to the established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

for in Article 64(2)(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

this sense, article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP) - provision of which

Article 64(2)(f) of the C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 14/16 LPACAP. In accordance with Article 85 of the LPACAP, if the sanction

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

article 5.1.f) of the GDPR. V Classification of the infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR The aforementioned infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

considered a proposal for resolution, as established in Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

articleArticle 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Administrative Procedure Co-common of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate interests of the controller or of a third party; and (d) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which