Search results

Articles 5, paragraph 1 to 1. c) and article 5, paragraph 1 al. f) with article83, paragraph 5, al. a), the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation679/2016

Ziggo et al. pointed out that the damage that DFW suffers as a result of the individual downloader is very small, since according to Ziggo et al. the Film

uitmaakt van de litigieuze klacht. Het betreft hier o.a. de vraag naar het al dan niet van toepassing zijn van de voornoemde aanbeveling. 4. De verweerder

version of the Privacy Ordinance, legal commentary», December 2019, Skullerud et al. Objective personal information is, for example, the data subject's age, address

Anwara Sp. z o.o., with its registered office in Warsaw at Al. Jerozolimskie 81 (formerly: Al. Solidarności 117/207), hereinafter referred to as the "Company"

necessary to achieve these goals (2019. judgment of 24 September GC et al. GC et al. [Delete links to special data], C‑136/17, EU:C:2019:773, paragraph 74)

inadmissible his claim against Arrow and dismissed the claims against ING et al., ordering [the appellant] to pay the costs of the proceedings and the follow-up

Personal Data Act and the Privacy Ordinance - Commentary edition», Skullerud et al. (2019). Article 29 Working Party Opinion 06/2014 on the concept of legitimate

Seitlinger et al, C-293/12 and C-594/12, EU:C:2014:238, nos. 35, 47 and 54 et seq.; Constitutional Court of Austria, decision of 27 June 2014, G 47/12 et al, AT:VFGH:2014:G47

ricezione dello stesso, a comunicare quali iniziative siano state intraprese al fine di dare attuazione a quanto prescritto e di fornire ogni elemento ritenuto

condotta per i sistemi informativi gestiti da soggetti privati in tema di crediti al consumo, affidabilità e puntualità nei pagamenti” – was not expired yet, the

DatenschutzR/Stender-Vorwachs, Ed. 28, Article 85 marginal no. 20; Frey, in: Schwartmann et al, DSGVO/BDSG, 2018, Art. 85 para. 25; further probably Schiedermair, in: Ehmann/Selmayr

C-136/17, GC et al. (31) The judgment of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) on 24 September 2019 in case C136/17, GC et al. is a continuation

DatenschutzR/Stender-Vorwachs, Ed. 28, Article 85 marginal no. 20; Frey, in: Schwartmann et al, DSGVO/BDSG, 2018, Art. 85 para. 25; further probably Schiedermair, in: Ehmann/Selmayr

decline of regulatory offences in particular and video surveillance (Gill et al., Assessing the impact of CCTV, the South City Case Study, Home Office Online

37/2020. In their short commentary on the decision, linked below, Craddock et al. also highlight the fact that part of the infringement, as well as at least

question now with due consideration ( of the evidence provided by Proximus al-dan-not in support of the need for the requested suspension, { of the balancing

websites is usually covered by the journalist exemption, see Wille Johansen et al., Personal Data Act commentary edition, Universitetsforlaget 2001, page 92

cases of Vnukovo Airlines (V.A.) and Others v. v. Vnukovo Airlines (V.A.) et al. Attorney General (2001) A.A.D. 969 and Kyriakides v. Republic (2013) 3 A

obligations under Article 6, §2, al. 5 and Article 9 of the Camera Act 1 2. there is a serious indication that article 6, § 2, al. 4 of the aforementioned law

et al. - the statement of defense of [defendant 1] et al. - the oral hearing held on September 23, 2020 - the pleading note of [plaintiff 1] et al. - the

interest owed by [applicants] et al. 2.8. On 1 October 2020, [applicants] et al. paid off the revolving credit. [applicants] et al. paid a total of €40,667.67

processing for [appellant sub 1] et al, e) to [appellant sub 1] et al in any other personal data relating to [appellant sub 1] et al that it processes. II. Order

of 3 November 1994 - 3 C 17.92 - BVerwGE 97, 79; Stuhlfauth, in: Bader et al., VwGO, 7th ed., § 113 marginal no. 34). If the plaintiff asserts - as here

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations. 5 By Skullerud et al. (2019), page 347, it appears: Contraceptive considerations dictate that the

order, as it does not specify the legal grounds that justify the decision (al. B) of paragraph 1 of article 615 of the CPC), has been overcome. In any event

the name of [applicant] et al. Course of the proceedings on appeal 1.1 By notice of appeal dated 12 March 2021, [applicant] et al. appealed against a decision

the statements made by [defendants et al.] are unlawful and therefore agrees with the Public Prosecution Service et al. The reasons for this are explained

Law: Article 4(1) GDPR Ley 16/2011, de 24 de junio, de contratos de crédito al consumo (law on consumer credit contracts) Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld

riportato la notizia dell’avvenuto utilizzo dell’App Mitiga Italia al fine di consentire l’accesso al Mapei Stadium di Reggio Emilia per assistere all’evento calcistico

Article 38.4 g), of the aforementioned Law, which considers as such: “Use al- data storage and recovery when the information has not been provided or obtained

demands are made for guilt. In legal literature, for example in Skullerud et al., Personal Protection Ordinance, Lovkommentar, (per 1 May 2022, juridika.no)

general, establece el sometimiento de tales sistemas al marco legal y con los límites inherentes al mismo, ya señalados anteriormente. Ello implica que

defendants - insofar as summoned by each of them - and that TikTok et al. only meant TikTok et al. 1 The procedure 1.1. The course of the procedure is apparent

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations.8 By Skullerud et al. (2019), page 347, it appears: Contraceptive considerations dictate that the

Article 38.4 g), of the aforementioned Law, which considers as such: “Use al- data storage and recovery when the information has not been provided or obtained

organization or person and aimed at the promotion or sale of services, products (al without payment), as well as brands or ideas, addressed by an organization

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations. 7 By Bergseng Skullerud et al., 2019, commentary on the Privacy Ordinance, page 347 it appears: Contraceptive

until 2019. On this date, Mr. X sold all of his shares to the S.A de droit al/emand Z and has ceased his functions as a director. Z then surrendered all

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations.6 By Skullerud et al. (2019), page 347, it appears: Contraceptive considerations dictate that the

known, in particular in the Google Spain6 judgments, Google/CNIL7 and GC et al./CNIL8. The Belgian Court of Cassation also ruled on the dereferencing and

et al., "Art. 8 ECHR', in J.H. Gerards et al. (eds.), Sdu Commentaar ECHR. Part I, The Hague: Sdu 2020, p. 868-894 (No. C.5). 132 C.J. Forder et al., "Art

ECHR in some respects. 6.38. NJCM et al. focus on the alleged violation of Article 8 ECHR, as confirmed by NJCM et al. at the hearing and understood by the

Facebook et al. is that only Facebook Ireland is responsible for the actions at issue in these proceedings. In that light, Facebook et al. do indeed refer

(…)” 2.13. On 24 October 2018, [plaintiff's] lawyer informed [defendants et al.] by registered letter of [plaintiff's] position that the use of [plaintiff's]

verwijderen, kan door de Geschillenkamer niet worden vastgesteld of deze weigering al dan niet terecht was om vervolgens te beoordelen of er sprake was van een

a hit list ubiquitous (see,in this sense, the judgment eDate Advertisin et al., C-509/09 and C-161/10,EU: C2011: 685, paragraph 45).(…) To respect the rights

notes that the Disputes Chamber infringed Article 5(1)(c) AVG derived, not al/one from the use of the national register number, but oak from the save the

finalizzate allo svolgimento dei compiti e all'esercizio dei poteri demandati al Garante per la protezione dei dati personali, nonche' all'adozione dei provvedimenti

rejected the request of [appellant sub 1] et al. concerning: a) the initial request of [appellant sub 1] et al. based on Article 15(1) GDPR for access to