Search results

at the controller's premises, constituting a violation of Article 24, Article 25(1), or Article 32 GDPR. The alleged loss of the data did not occur at the

2016/679, reported to art. 14 para. (11) and art. 15 para. (1) of Law no. 102/2005, as well as pursuant to art. 12-14 of Law no. 190/2018, corroborated with

in the cookies "_ga" and _"gid" on August 14, 2020, at 12:46:19.344 CET. Subsequently, on August 14, 2020, at 12:46:19.948 CET, these identification numbers

data subject pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, for a theft of their personal identity and financial data, because it violated Article 32(1) GDPR which led to

have applied the new law, namely the GDPR and its implementing act - the Czech Law on Data Processing 2019 - instead of the old Law on Data Protection 2000

131/18k (ecolex 2019/151 [Zemann] = iFamZ 2019/78 [Deixler-Hübner] = jusIT 2019/29 [Thiele; Jahnel, 123] = RZ 2019/11 [Spenling] = MR 2019, 190 [Walter]) and

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot

resolution no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in OJ no. 106 of 8/5/2019, web doc. no. 9107633 (hereinafter "Regulation of the Guarantor no. 1/2019"); Given the

infringements of Article 48 of Law 9/2014, of May 9, General Telecommunications Law (hereinafter LGT), in accordance with the provisions of Article 84.3 of the

analogous to Article 18 (1)(a) GDPR the Court held that § 12 of the German Registration Law explicitly exludes the application of Article 18 (1)(a) GDPR

July 18, 2019, (hereinafter: Log4); 143 144 (3) on September 12, 2019 (hereinafter: Log5). 153. [CONFIDENTIAL] 154. [CONFIDENTIAL] 145 13File 14, attachment[CONFIDENTIAL]

There was no compensable damage, no causal causation and no unlawful and culpable conduct. The implementation of provisions under data protection law did not

be heard by the Authority (Article 166, paragraphs 6 and 7, of the Code; as well as Article 18, paragraph 1, of the Law No. 689 of November 24, 1981).

articles 20 and following; Considering Decree No. 2019-536 of May 29, 2019 taken for the application of Law No. 78-17 of January 6, 1978 relating to information

Therefore, given that Article 6(1), Article 5(1)(a), Article 5(1)(d), Article 5(1)(c), and Article 14 GDPR were infringed in connection to Article 5(1)(b), the

and 19006872 ; Having regard to decisions No. 2019-081C of April 24, 2019 and No. 2019-102C of June 6, 2019 of the President of the Commission Nationale

infringement of Article 28 and Article 32 GDPR, the objection of the HU SA relating to the possible infringement of Article 5(1)(f), Article 32, and Article 34 GDPR

tobe heardby the EDPBin line with Article 41 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, applicable case law, and Article 11 of the EDPBRoP. This is without

(GDPR), in conjunction with article 3.º, n.º 2 of article 4.º, and line b) of n.º 1 of article 6.º, all of Law n.º 58/2019, of August 8 (LERGPD). 7. It

that national law, and Law No. 0 58/2019 of 8 August, which came into force on 9 August 2019, expressly repealed the aforementioned Law No. 0 67/98 of 26

subsequent lettersfrom 29 February 2019, 19 April 2019 and 24 February 2020, as well as a phone call on 1 April 2019, that wereaddressed by theIE SA. 20

the GDPR, in particular Article 5 (1) GDPR, article 24 and article 28 GDPR, all this based on article 58.2, d) GDPR and article 100, §1, 9 ° WOG, within

over the operation of the TCF (Article 14.5.b GDPR); c. the acquisition of these data is not prescribed by law (Article 14.5.c of the GDPR); and d. the personal

Draft Decision concerned Meta IE’s compliance with Article 5(1)(a) and (c), Article 6(1), Article 12(1), Articles 13, 24, 25 and 35 GDPR in respect of certain

Customer 1 has violated Article 12 (1) and Article 14 (1) points a) and c) of the General Data Protection Regulation, as well as Article 14 ( the provisions of

Months total 342/20 01/2014 12/2017 41.92 48 2,012.16 342/20 01/2018 12/2018 32.15 (41.92 ./. 9.77) 12 385.80 541/20 01/2015 12/2020 15.55 72 1,119.60 3,517

administrations (see Article 54-bis of Legislative Decree no. 165 of March 30, 2001, introduced by Article 1, paragraph 51, of Law No. 190/2012, containing

recognized under customary law (cf. HessVGH, decision of February 8, 2019 - 8 B 2575/18 -, juris marginal number 19 = BeckRS 2019, 4401 marginal number 15;

requirements of Article 6(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR, which cannot be superseded by relying on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR? Is Article 5(1)(c) GDPR

approved by law - even against the will of the data subject (cf. Roßnagel in Simitis/Hornung / Spicker, data protection law, comment, Article 5 margin no. 63 f)

within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 15, Art. 9 (1) GDPR. Sending this health data to a third party was prohibited by law. There is no reason for exception; in

pursuant to Article 13 of the GDPR for collaborators; Information pursuant to Article 13 of the GDPR for employees; Disclosure pursuant to Article 4, paragraph

2013 - 1 ABR 17/12 - para. 15, 18; April 25, 2001 - 5 AZR 395/99 - to II of the reasons; BGH December 21, 2011 - I ZR 190/10 - para. 12). cc) The last application

national law regarding administrative offences to the CJEU. On 30/10/2019, the Berlin DPA fined Deutsche Wohnen SE € 14,500,000 for violating Article 5(1)(e)

of the Basic Law and Article 12 of the Basic Law outweighs the interests of the plaintiff from Articles 2 (1) and 1 (1) of the Basic Law. 65The freedom

State law, the controller or the specific criteria for its nomination may be provided for by Union or Member State law. Pursuant to Article 4(12) GDPR:

authority pursuant to Article 58(2) or failure to provide access in violation of Article 58(1). […]” 12 4.5. EEA and Norwegian Law The GDPR has been incorporated

Federal Fiscal Code - BAO, Federal Law Gazette No. 194/1961, the Agricultural Procedure Act - AgrVG, Federal Law Gazette No. 173/1950, and the Civil Service

Administrative Law Way and the Civil law and the interfaces to constitutional law and European law in: Nunner-Krautgasser/Garber/Klauser (editors), Law Enforcement

Decision No. 01/2019 of 16 January 2020. Available at: https://gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/publications/beslissing-nr.-01-2019-van-16-januari-2019.pdf

Administrative Court had applied national law of evidence, the Court clarified that Article 5(2) GDPR postulates a specific law of evidence based on the principle

obligations for those responsible are standardized in Article 12, GDPR. Pursuant to Article 12(1) GDPRArticle 12, paragraph one, GDPR, the controller shall take

(see LG Hamburg, Urt. v. 31.05.2019 - 305 O 117/18, BeckRS 2019, 21755 marginal no. 57; LG Traunstein, judgment of 13.12.2019 – 8 O 2622/18). d. Nor does

sanctioned ex article 8. f) of the Organic Law 4/2010; secondarily, it would be a minor infraction, ex article 9, sections c) or i) of the same Organic Law (all

own applications dated February 4th, 2019 (for G1.) and February 25th, 2019 (for G2.). 4By decision of May 17, 2019, the district court Tiergarten ordered

freedom of action (Article 2 sentence 1 of the Basic Constitutional Law), data protection (Article 2 sentence 2 of the Basic Constitutional Law) and his right

self-determination, which is also rooted in Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the Basic Law, is based on the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court

Union law, unless this Part or other specific legal provisions contain deviating provisions. The requirements of Article 2(1), Article 12 and Article 15(3)

January 2019, February 2019, March 2019, April 2019 and May 2019 as well as EUR 5,812.00 gross for the months of June 2019, July 2019, August 2019, September

in Article 12(b) of that Directive. (judgment of 17 July 2014, YS and Others, C‑141/12 and C‑372/12, EU:C:2014:2081, paragraph 44 and the case-law cited)

member states within the framework of the regulation in article 85. In article 85.1 4See article 1 of the data protection regulation and i.a. recital 10

Transparency towards those involved (Article 12.1, Article 13.1 and 13.2, Article 14.1 and 14.2, Article 5.2, Article 24.1, and Article 25.1 GDPR) 57 II.4.1. Position

controlled tried to base the processing on contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR) or legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR), the requirement of necessity was not

protection law (LG Mainz, judgment of November 12, 2021 - 3 O 12/20, juris para. 73 - not final; Quaas, in: Wolff/Brink, BeckOK data protection law, 42nd edition

specific categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the

page 43, §103. Royal Decree no. 80, art. 6, 2°, article 12, §1, 1°. 52AR no. 80, art. 8 §1, article 12, §1, 1°, art. 14, §1, 1°, par. 2. Decision on the

exercise the rights granted to them in Art 12 of the guidelines (ECJ C-141/12, margin no. 59). Although this case law was issued on the data protection directive

on the basis of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR and Article 6(1)(f) GDPR . 66NO SA Request to the EDPB, p. 12. 67NO SA Request to the EDPB, p. 12. 68NO SA Request

violates Article 5(1), Article 6(1) and Article 12(1) GDPR. Therefore the DE-HH SA adopted, on 10 May 2021, provisional measures under Article 66(1) GDPR

Registers, in accordance with Article 16 GDPR; • The Archbishop must comply with his obligations under Article 12(3) and Article 12(4) of the GDPR in order to

based on article 4 of the law of December 31, Decision on the merits 47/2022 - 15/73 1963 (hereafter, law relating to civil protection) and the law of 15

Service, the relevant provisions of the GDPR are Article 14, read in conjunction with Article 12(1). 28. Article 14 of the GDPR concerns transparency in the context

company I-DE REDES ELÉCTRICAS INTELIGENTES, S.A.U., article 12.2 b) of the Electricity Sector Law and article 14 of the Code of separation of Activities of the

addition, he found that the company violated Article 7 (3) GDPR, Article 12 (2) GDPR, Article 17 (1)(b)GDPR and Article 24 (1) GDPR, by failing to implement appropriate

initiative. On 31 October 2019, your WV was asked to respond to the facts as known to the AP until then. On 14 and 18 November 2019, UWV responded to that

company I-DE REDES ELÉCTRICAS INTELIGENTES, S.A.U., article 12.2 b) of the Electricity Sector Law and article 14 of the Code of separation of Activities of the

within the meaning of Article 4 No. 2 GDPR in the form of disclosure through transmission. The term “processing”, as defined in Article 4 No. 2 GDPR, is, according