Search results

at the controller's premises, constituting a violation of Article 24, Article 25(1), or Article 32 GDPR. The alleged loss of the data did not occur at the

2016/679, reported to art. 14 para. (11) and art. 15 para. (1) of Law no. 102/2005, as well as pursuant to art. 12-14 of Law no. 190/2018, corroborated with

in the cookies "_ga" and _"gid" on August 14, 2020, at 12:46:19.344 CET. Subsequently, on August 14, 2020, at 12:46:19.948 CET, these identification numbers

data subject pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, for a theft of their personal identity and financial data, because it violated Article 32(1) GDPR which led to

have applied the new law, namely the GDPR and its implementing act - the Czech Law on Data Processing 2019 - instead of the old Law on Data Protection 2000

131/18k (ecolex 2019/151 [Zemann] = iFamZ 2019/78 [Deixler-Hübner] = jusIT 2019/29 [Thiele; Jahnel, 123] = RZ 2019/11 [Spenling] = MR 2019, 190 [Walter]) and

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot

resolution no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in OJ no. 106 of 8/5/2019, web doc. no. 9107633 (hereinafter "Regulation of the Guarantor no. 1/2019"); Given the

infringements of Article 48 of Law 9/2014, of May 9, General Telecommunications Law (hereinafter LGT), in accordance with the provisions of Article 84.3 of the

analogous to Article 18 (1)(a) GDPR the Court held that § 12 of the German Registration Law explicitly exludes the application of Article 18 (1)(a) GDPR

July 18, 2019, (hereinafter: Log4); 143 144 (3) on September 12, 2019 (hereinafter: Log5). 153. [CONFIDENTIAL] 154. [CONFIDENTIAL] 145 13File 14, attachment[CONFIDENTIAL]

There was no compensable damage, no causal causation and no unlawful and culpable conduct. The implementation of provisions under data protection law did not

be heard by the Authority (Article 166, paragraphs 6 and 7, of the Code; as well as Article 18, paragraph 1, of the Law No. 689 of November 24, 1981).

articles 20 and following; Considering Decree No. 2019-536 of May 29, 2019 taken for the application of Law No. 78-17 of January 6, 1978 relating to information

Therefore, given that Article 6(1), Article 5(1)(a), Article 5(1)(d), Article 5(1)(c), and Article 14 GDPR were infringed in connection to Article 5(1)(b), the

and 19006872 ; Having regard to decisions No. 2019-081C of April 24, 2019 and No. 2019-102C of June 6, 2019 of the President of the Commission Nationale

infringement of Article 28 and Article 32 GDPR, the objection of the HU SA relating to the possible infringement of Article 5(1)(f), Article 32, and Article 34 GDPR

tobe heardby the EDPBin line with Article 41 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, applicable case law, and Article 11 of the EDPBRoP. This is without

(GDPR), in conjunction with article 3.º, n.º 2 of article 4.º, and line b) of n.º 1 of article 6.º, all of Law n.º 58/2019, of August 8 (LERGPD). 7. It

that national law, and Law No. 0 58/2019 of 8 August, which came into force on 9 August 2019, expressly repealed the aforementioned Law No. 0 67/98 of 26