Search results

Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA). Dr. Giorgos Rousopoulos, representing the Scientific Personnel Association of the HDPA, addressed the audience and expressed

meeting by videoconference on 12-07-2021, following the meeting of 23-04-2021 and postponing the meeting of 31/3/2021, in order to examine the case referred

accordance with the provisions of articles 55 para. 1, 2 para. 1 and 3 para. 2 GDPR and 13 para. 1 item g' Law 4624/2019, the Authority has the authority

a meeting by teleconference on 12-07-2021 followed by 23-04- 2021 meeting and adjourned the meeting from 31/3/2021, in order to examine the case mentioned

principle Article 5(1)(c) by sharing an employee's personal and health data with multiple recipients without proper justification. The HDPA ordered DEYA X to

operational video-surveillance system. Thus, the HDPA found that using this system violates Articles 5(1)(a), 5(1)(b) and 5(2) GDPR. Also, the CCTV system in

supplemented file. The HDPA held that COSMOTE violated Articles 5 and 6 Law 3471/2006 (national law implementing the Directive 2002/58/EC Directive on privacy and

(definition) Article 5.1: Data processing principles Article 5.1.a: Principle of legality, objectivity and transparency Article 5.1. b: Principle of limitation

accordance with the provisions of articles 55 para. 1, 2 para. 1 and 3 para. 2 GDPR and 13 para. 1 letter g' of Law 4624/2019, the Authority has the authority

Article 6 (1) GPA, as well as to be able to demonstrate in the context of internal compliance compliance with the principles of Article 5 1 1 GPA, including

refer to the Greek original for more details. Athens, 12-05-2021 No. Prot.1207 DECISION 20/2021 (Department) The Personal Data Protection Authority met at

the authorization from 04-02-2021 of the complainant to the attorney-at-law, while it was preceded by the one from 07-01- 2021 its relevant authorization)

purpose limitation under Article 5(1)(a) of the GDPR. 1(b) and the obligation (principle) of accountability under Article 5(1)(b). 2 of the GDPR, that is to

Teleraise): one (1) complaint (with item G.C.1 in the Appendix) d) ST & Co. E.E. (hereinafter also Zitatel): eight (8) complaints (with items G.D.1 to G.D.7 and

in paragraph 1 of the same article, which include legality, objectivity and transparency of processing in accordance with article 5 par. 1 item a' - i.e

Aalmoes and 1 1 2 others v the Netherlands admissibility of 25- 1 1 -2004. , See Press Release C / EX / 1728 / 0 1 .3.20 1 8 regarding the granting ofno

DPA imposed a fine of 2000€ to the company for violating articles 5(1)(c) and 6(1) GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs or news articles here! The

complaint with the Hellenic DPA ("HDPA"). The HDPA ruled on each one of these requests. Firstly, regarding the request from May 2021, the DPA held that the request

necessary and proportionate. The HDPA held that for its first intervention, even though the data controller informed the HDPA that it took corrective measures