Search results

From GDPRhub
  • constitute possible violations of the Personal Data Act 2000 §§ 11 and 8, the Personal Data Regulations 2000 §§ 2-11 and 2-14. • The Customs Act § 13-12 only
    61 KB (9,133 words) - 18:55, 5 March 2022
  • 1978, which was in force until the enactment of the Personal Data Act of 2000, which built on Directive EC/95/46. In 2014, human rights inspired by the
    8 KB (1,064 words) - 12:53, 23 June 2023
  • The initial cases were assessed against the former Personal Data Act of 2000, however since the case continued into 2018 (and later), after the GDPR had
    16 KB (2,111 words) - 06:21, 6 March 2022
  • the case in accordance with the current Personal Data Act of 2000 and made a decision on 8 November 2017 where the Medical List received a number of orders
    46 KB (7,024 words) - 06:18, 6 March 2022
  • that the wording of the exemption for journalistic activities in Personopplysningsloven § 3 was broader than Article 85 GDPR. It highlighted that the exemption
    29 KB (4,480 words) - 16:15, 6 December 2023
  • based on breaches of Article 24, unlike the GDPR cf. personopplysningsloven § 26. Personopplysningsloven § 26 refers to Article 83(4). https://www.datatilsynet
    45 KB (7,286 words) - 18:55, 5 March 2022
  • Personal Data Act 2000 § 8 do not apply either. Since the processing of the relevant personal data lacks a basis in the Personal Data Act 2000 § 8, it is not
    144 KB (23,058 words) - 18:48, 5 March 2022
  • Norwegian Data Protection Act (LOV-2000-04-14-31) (repealed). Cf. Section 50 of the Norwegian Data Protection Act (LOV-2000-04-14-31) (repealed). In should
    162 KB (24,007 words) - 19:41, 15 February 2023