Search results
From GDPRhub
- personal data under 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The complainant challenged the decision before the ICO. Is the information personal3 KB (212 words) - 16:21, 7 March 2022
- didn't grant the access to the personal data requested to the individual under section 40(2) of the FOIA. The ICO had to determine whether the Council had6 KB (723 words) - 13:11, 16 July 2020
- not grant the access to all the information requested on the exception laid out on section 40(2) of the FOIA. The ICO had to determine whether the Council6 KB (687 words) - 13:45, 16 July 2020
- whether the Universityis entitled to withhold the requested information under section 40(2) of the FOIA. As per the applicability of Article Articles 40(2)5 KB (509 words) - 16:23, 7 March 2022
- Authority (‘the Authority’) withheld the information requested under section 40(2) of the FOIA. This provision applies as an exemption to the principle of disclosure4 KB (406 words) - 17:53, 10 March 2022
- at section 40(2) or 31(2) of the FOIA. First, the ICO had to assess if the requested information imposes the burden upon the DfE. Second, the ICO analyzes5 KB (673 words) - 16:37, 12 May 2020
- relying on Section 40(2) and Section 40(3A) of the Freedom of Information Act. Section 40(3A)(a) in particular prevents the disclosure of information that5 KB (621 words) - 10:14, 24 August 2020
- required fot the role and the standard contract used when commissioning the care. The CCG has withheld the job description under section 40 on the basis that5 KB (585 words) - 00:03, 15 September 2020
- 30(2) of FOIA, however it was exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 40(2) of FOIA. The MOD also explained to the complainant that for the avoidance24 KB (3,788 words) - 16:22, 7 March 2022
- in Articles 40(2) and 43(2) FOIA apply to the case. As per the applicability of Article Articles 40(2) FOIA, it must be determined whether the withheld information6 KB (725 words) - 16:13, 7 March 2022
- exemptions. The exemptions relating to the provision of information can be absolute by Section 2(2)(a) FOIA or qualified by section 2(2)(b) FOIA. Where an28 KB (4,450 words) - 15:12, 20 October 2023
- information. As such, the City of York Council were correct in applying the Section 40(2) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) exemption. The complainant requested5 KB (506 words) - 16:39, 7 March 2022
- Department correctly refused to disclose the requested information under section 40(2) FOIA, by way of section 40(3A) a. The requested information constitutes3 KB (248 words) - 12:52, 24 August 2020
- Trust was right to withhold the information requested under section 40(2) FOIA, by way of section 40(3A)(a). The ICO saw the particular data subjects’ interests5 KB (484 words) - 17:51, 23 August 2020
- that D&CP was entitled to withhold the information requested under section 40(2), by way of section 40(3A)(a)of the FOIA. Share your comments here! Share4 KB (402 words) - 16:37, 7 March 2022
- complaint, ICO examined whether the Northamptonshire Police had the right to apply the section 40 of the FOIA ("neither confirm nor deny" provisions), which8 KB (645 words) - 16:13, 2 March 2020