Search results

From GDPRhub
  • personal data under 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The complainant challenged the decision before the ICO. Is the information personal
    3 KB (212 words) - 16:21, 7 March 2022
  • didn't grant the access to the personal data requested to the individual under section 40(2) of the FOIA. The ICO had to determine whether the Council had
    6 KB (723 words) - 13:11, 16 July 2020
  • not grant the access to all the information requested on the exception laid out on section 40(2) of the FOIA. The ICO had to determine whether the Council
    6 KB (687 words) - 13:45, 16 July 2020
  • whether the Universityis entitled to withhold the requested information under section 40(2) of the FOIA. As per the applicability of Article Articles 40(2)
    5 KB (509 words) - 16:23, 7 March 2022
  • Authority (‘the Authority’) withheld the information requested under section 40(2) of the FOIA. This provision applies as an exemption to the principle of disclosure
    4 KB (406 words) - 17:53, 10 March 2022
  • at section 40(2) or 31(2) of the FOIA. First, the ICO had to assess if the requested information imposes the burden upon the DfE. Second, the ICO analyzes
    5 KB (673 words) - 16:37, 12 May 2020
  • relying on Section 40(2) and Section 40(3A) of the Freedom of Information Act. Section 40(3A)(a) in particular prevents the disclosure of information that
    5 KB (621 words) - 10:14, 24 August 2020
  • required fot the role and the standard contract used when commissioning the care. The CCG has withheld the job description under section 40 on the basis that
    5 KB (585 words) - 00:03, 15 September 2020
  • 30(2) of FOIA, however it was exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 40(2) of FOIA. The MOD also explained to the complainant that for the avoidance
    24 KB (3,788 words) - 16:22, 7 March 2022
  • in Articles 40(2) and 43(2) FOIA apply to the case. As per the applicability of Article Articles 40(2) FOIA, it must be determined whether the withheld information
    6 KB (725 words) - 16:13, 7 March 2022
  • exemptions.   The exemptions relating to the provision of information can be absolute by Section 2(2)(a) FOIA or qualified by section 2(2)(b) FOIA.  Where an
    28 KB (4,450 words) - 15:12, 20 October 2023
  • information. As such, the City of York Council were correct in applying the Section 40(2) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) exemption. The complainant requested
    5 KB (506 words) - 16:39, 7 March 2022
  • Department correctly refused to disclose the requested information under section 40(2) FOIA, by way of section 40(3A) a. The requested information constitutes
    3 KB (248 words) - 12:52, 24 August 2020
  • Trust was right to withhold the information requested under section 40(2) FOIA, by way of section 40(3A)(a). The ICO saw the particular data subjects’ interests
    5 KB (484 words) - 17:51, 23 August 2020
  • that D&CP was entitled to withhold the information requested under section 40(2), by way of section 40(3A)(a)of the FOIA. Share your comments here! Share
    4 KB (402 words) - 16:37, 7 March 2022
  • complaint, ICO examined whether the Northamptonshire Police had the right to apply the section 40 of the FOIA ("neither confirm nor deny" provisions), which
    8 KB (645 words) - 16:13, 2 March 2020