Search results

competitors do that too. The newly appointed data protection officer says: "I am sorry, but 'everyone else does it' is not a legal basis". There is an ongoing

form be electronically processed and used for the purpose of contacting me. I am aware that I can remove my consent at any time". AEPD fined the data controller

reported, that are recorded in the years 2015, 2016 and 2018, and all of which I am the injured party. These have been considered by you as necessary information

AG Frankfurt am Main - 31 C 2043/22 (78) Court: AG Frankfurt am Main (Germany) Jurisdiction: Germany Relevant Law: Article 4 GDPR Article 15(3) GDPR Article

The Higher Regional Court Frankfurt held that a data subject has a right to injunctive relief against the controller under Article 17(1) GDPR. The data

information it sought. On 03 May 2016, the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main) dismissed the request. Constrain Film Verleih appealed

such need. 
 
 I am satisfied that the claim has to be treated as only a claim for damages of, at best, modest damages. I am satisfied this should

which that access took place. The Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) rejected Constantin Film Verleih’s information

39Tel: 213928400Fax: 213976832PRIVACY LINEwww.cnpd.ptWorking days from 10 am to 1 pmdoubtsenpdpt Page 2 10.11.12.Process No. 9932/2018 1vTheobligation

I not I have subscribed, nor confirmed that email that they sent me, but I am subscribed in the Robinson list, attached certificate certifying it. I request

On [...] - [...] February 2020, an employee of the IT department of KSSiP, AM and the Director of the IT Department of KSSiP, PT, received messages from

social network TINDER as B.B.B. putting November 17 in my description, that I am looking for information about my photos since they have been stolen ”, and

skeleton argument describes these publications as "very far from hit pieces". I am not sure quite what he means by that, but on any view they amount to a sustained

attorney-in-fact of the complainant (AM..), as well as Angelos Georgiadis, attorney of the diagnostician center (AM..), while B, its Data Protection Officer

Mustamäe Apteek OÜ I have challenged, I am seriously concerned about all data processing under the Apotheka brand after. I am surprised that a large group can

("Capital"). On 2 November 2020 Capital wrote to the Applicant and said, "I am writing to you to notify you of a breach of Capital Letters' data which included

following: "Dear,I am not a customer of [defendant], yet today I received an email from you about a workshop you are offering. Therefore, I am wondering the

suspension of the external access to the said file was 16 February 2021 11:15 am. In the absence of any factual evidence to suggest that the said file was

of anxiety and fear. These events occurred on 08/07/2019 01:50 AM and 08/08/2019 05:30 AM, which were testified in an appearance procedure before the Civil

complainant, Aikaterini Karapatsia, lawyer (AM/DSA ...), appeared on behalf of the complainant Charalambos Tsiliotis, lawyer (AM/DSA ...) and B, deputy director