Search results

elements in Article 2(1) are fulfilled, the GDPR applies unless the processing falls under one of the exemptions named in Article 2(2)(a) to (d) GDPR. The first

under Article 57(1)(f) of the GDPR, each supervisory authority is required on its territory to handle complaints which, in accordance with Article 77(1)

Beck, 2018, 2nd edition). We refer, in that respect, to the Commentary on Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. Spiecker et al., GDPR Article-by-Article Commentary (2023)

the GDPR, and no exception is applicable. Article 2(2)(a) and (b) of the GDPR represents partly a continuation of the first indent of Article 3(2) of Directive

(Articles 58(2)(i) GDPR) & 83 GDPR) and, after having taken into consideration Article 83(2) GDPR's fine measuring principles and ARTICLE 29 Data Protection

explanatory statement of the law, Article 10 defines the Authority’s competence in compliance with Article 55 GDPR.Article 55 GDPR provides for a restriction

considered an exemption clause of paragraph 2. Article 4 Act no. 90/2018, cf. also point c, paragraph 2 Article 2 regulation (EU) 2016/679, therefore apply

a breach of Article L. 34-5 of the French Post and Electronic Communications Code. The CNIL recalls the provisions of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, according to

relation to the incident and in light of the powers granted to me by section 58(2)(a) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the DPA decided to issue a warning to

case fell under the household exception found in Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. According to this provision, the GDPR does not apply to the processing of personal data

exclusively private or domestic activity, which is lawful, based on the 2.2.c, GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs or news articles here! The decision

the processing of personal data is not covered by the GDPR, according to Article 2(2)(c) of the GDPR. However, the DPA concluded that Orienteringsret.dk

individual, it should be clarified at the outset that, in accordance with Article 2 (2) of the General Regulation, the General Regulation does not apply to

and that none of the exceptions of Article 2(2) GDPR applied. Hence, it concluded the landlord violated Article 15 GDPR. The landlord filed appeal against

security under Article 2(2)(a) GDPR. The GDPR will not apply if the activity of the controller falls outside the scope of Union Law under Article 2(2)(a). The

stressed that the only exceptions to the GDPR scope of application are provided by Article 2(2) and (3) of the GDPR. These exceptions shall be interpreted

meaning of Article 4(15) GDPR. The DSB founds that the GDPR does not apply due to the household exception provided for in Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. Pursuant

and that therefore the exemption under Article 2(2)(c) GDPR applied. Article 2(2)(c) GDPR states that the GDPR will not apply if the data is processed

accordance with Article 15 (1) GDPR. They argued that the scope of application of the GDPR is not excluded according to Article 2 (2) because the GDPR should be

“household exemption” Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. Therefore, such processing of plaintiff’s photos falls within the scope of the GDPR. Given the lack of consent