Search results

out pursuant to Article 83(1) GDPR. This part of Article 83 concerns the principle of "unity of action" (see above). With Article 83(3) GDPR, the legislator

access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction (Article 18 GDPR), notification (Article 19 GDPR) or data

measures to ensure a level of security commensurate with the risks, in breach of Article 32 (1) (b) and (c) BDAR and Article 83 (2) (a), (d) and The factors

object (Article 21 GDPR) and the right to erasure (Article 17 GDPR) of data subjects. Therefore the controller was not found in breach of Article 25(2) GDPR

the Spanish DPA imposed a €3000 fine on the defendant and stated he has to comply with Article 5(1)(c) and Article 83(2)(a)(b) GDPR. Share your comments here

fact that Article 4(2) GDPR includes "transmission" and "dissemination" in the definition of processing means that publishing a recording of a person's

data. Hence, it considered Article 32(1)(a), Article 32(1)(b), Article 32(1)(d) GDPR to be breached. Pursuant to Article 82(2) GDPR, the DPA took several aggravating

such processing to be legitimate on the basis of Article 9 (2) (B) GDPR in conjunction with Article 32 GDPR" (see note cited, p. 4) (see footnote cit., p

complainant's Article 15 entitlements were aggravating factors in deciding the amount of the fine issued to the respondent, on the basis of GDPR Articles 83(2)(a)

reasoned in accordance with Article 4(24) GDPR and, after conducting its own assessment of the factors under Article 83(2) GDPR, found that the proposed fine

accountability by article.5 par.2 GDPR, i.e. it violated fundamental principles of the GDPR on the protection of personal data. 8. As a consequence of the

sanctions HOLALUZ-CLIDOM, S.A. with NIF A65445033, for a violation of Article 6.1 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR, a fine of 70,000 euros (seventy

violation of Article 5 (1) (a) and (2) and Article 6 (1) GDPR; and that 2. there is a violation of article 12, paragraph 1, paragraph 2 and paragraph 3, article

circumstances in relation to Article 5 and Articles 32 and 33 GDPR. First, there was the duration of the infringement under Article 83(2)(a) GDPR; second, there was

para. 1 lit. a and c as well as Art. 6 para. 1 of the GDPR. To 2): c) Article 50b (2) DSG 2000 (for the period prior to 25 May 2018) (d) Article 13(3) DSG

14/19 Regarding section k) of article 83.2 of the GDPR, the LOPDGDD, article 76, “Sanctions and corrective measures” provides: "2. In accordance with the provisions

of the legal bases in Article 6 (1) and an additional criterion under Article 9 (2) of the GDPR apply. Article 9 (2) of the GDPR does not contain an exception

the processing of personal data (83 (2) (k) GDPR); the fact that basic personal identifiers are affected (83 (2) (g) GDPR); the intentionality or negligence

that the action was intentional (Article 83(2)(b) GDPR), and that the personal data are sensitive (Article 83(2)(g) GDPR). Share your comments here! Share

respect to section 83.2 (k) of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, section 76, "Sanctions and corrective measures," he says: "In accordance with Article 83(2)(k) of the Regulation