Search results

agreed between the parties (according to § 8 b paragraph 2 MB/KK). 52 § 8 b para. 2 MB/KK violates §203 sentence 2 VVG and is therefore ineffective according

pronunciation 22-07-2020 Date of publication 14-08-2020 Case number 8598127 KK EXPL 20-357 Jurisdictions Civil Justice Special features Interim injunction

daily hospital allowance insurance, which include the model conditions MB/KK 2009 in Part I (Annex BLD 3). 2 In the first instance, the premium adjustments

protection violation by KK. The claim of the defendant is incorrect. On January 14, 2021, the employee of KK who was known by name again denied KK's obligation to

Judgment of 16 June 2005 - C-105/03, NJW 2005, 2839 marginal no. 47 [M. Pupino]; KK-OWiG/Rogall, § 3 marginal no. 83 with further references). ), in the interpretation

daily hospital allowances. The contractual relationship is based on the MB/KK 2009. The insurance conditions of the defendant provide for the right of the

it over. In this respect, no discretionary errors are apparent. Paragraph89 kk. Apart from that, no reasons are apparent which stand in the way of the lawfulness

shows all the communications that have taken place "(see minutes cit., P. 2); kk. the group DPO stated that "the emails exchanged with the riders are kept

pactsafe io/s/8a18d792-fd76-44db-9b92-b0bb7981c248JIeaaI htmI#contract-s1ytru6kk. attached to the case file). Cf. Reply to the CNPD, set out in points 2 and

the termination of the employment relationship" (see minutes cited, p. 6); kk. "The company is evaluating what can be a reasonable amount of time of inactivity