Search results

IP address in particular can serve as a person-specific characteristic (cf. LG München I, judgement of 20.1.2022 - 3 O 17493/20) and can be used for identification

does not therefore apply (also LG Essen ruling of November 10, 2022 - 6 O 111/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 34818 marginal number 38; LG Paderborn, judgment of December

The Regional Court of Cologne (LG Köln) held that a search engine is not allowed to show search results if the linked website contains untrue factual claims

be permanently and completely deleted by CodeShip (also in a parallel case LG Munich I, judgment of December 9, 2021, 31 O 16606/20, juris, para. 36). In

against the controller before the Regional Court Cologne (Landgericht Köln - LG Köln) requesting that the court orders the controller to delete the entry

of January 14, 2021 - 1 BvR 2853/19 -, juris para. 19 f.; Regional Court (LG) LG Saarbrücken, ECJ submission of November 22, 2021 - 5 O 151/19 -, juris para

protection of privacy (LG Berlin NJW 2016, 1966; LG Frankfurt a.M., Urt. v. 27.09.2018 - 2-03 O 320/17, BeckRS 2018, 25130; LG Frankfurt a.M., Judgement

judgement dated 4 May 2023, the Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln, LG Köln) dismissed the action as it considered the claim of the Association to

to the judgment of the LG Köln in case 33 O 376/22 for further details. However, the court reversed the decision of the LG Köln with respect to the claim

Case Law Identifier: ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:150621UVIZR576.19.0 Appeal from: LG Köln (Germany) 26 S 13/18 Appeal to: Original Language(s): German Original Source:

(Oberlandesgericht Köln, OLG Köln) decided on appeal on case 28 O 138/22 by the Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln, LG Köln). In the appealed judgment

and therefore also includes periods in which the account is blocked (also LG Köln, judgement of 24.1.2019, 24 O 201/18 of the cl. submitted as an attachment

protected by copyright (LG Berlin, ZUM-RD 2014, 105, 107 [juris para. 26]; LG Frankfurt, ZUM 2017, 772, 775 [juris para. 67]; LG Hamburg, NJW-RR 2017, 1392

Baden-Württemberg, judgment of 20. December 2018 - 17 Sa 11/18; LG Köln, judgment of 11 November 2020 - 23 O 172/19; LG Dresden, judgment of 29 May 2020 - 6 O 76/20; AG

“emotional discomfort” are not sufficient to substantiate a claim for damages (LG Köln - 28 O 138/22). Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is

1584 marginal no. 20 - Nerzquäler; as well as here LG Köln, Urt. v. 13.05.2019 - 21 O 283/19, Annex B60; LG Marburg, judgment of 17.05.2019 - 2 O 150/15, enclosure

The Higher Regional Court of Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln) ruled on the interplay between the “right to objection” and the “right to erasure” under

The Higher Regional Court of Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln) ruled on the exception to the “right to erasure” under Article 17(3) GDPR. Two doctors sued

lawfulness of the processing. The Higher Regional Court of Köln (Oberlandesgericht Köln – OLG Köln) rejected the arguments of the controller and upheld the

would not be possible to check the formal legality (cf. LG Wuppertal, r+s 2021, 696 para. 24; LG Detmold, BeckRS 2021, 34230 para. 24). 19 bb) The subsequent