Search results

From GDPRhub
  • name in brackets. Example: A case of the Den Haag Court of First Instance (Rechtbank) can be found as Rb. Den Haag - C/09/581973/KG ZA 19/1024. Names of many
    17 KB (2,510 words) - 13:56, 24 April 2023
  • Rb. Den Haag - C/09/581973/KG ZA 19/1024 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The Court of First Instance of Den Hague declared inadmissible request about the deletion of publication in the government site and compensation under
    20 KB (3,086 words) - 16:15, 10 March 2022
  • Rb. Den Haag - C/09/581706 / HA RK 19-593 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The District Court of the Hague (Rb. Den Haag) proposes to submit preliminary questions to the ECJ on the interpretation of - inter alia - Articles 12(5)
    34 KB (5,811 words) - 09:44, 8 December 2020
  • Appeal of The Hague (Gerechtshof Den Haag) rejected an appeal and upheld the District Court of the Hague's (Rb. Den Haag) decision. There it was decided
    43 KB (7,297 words) - 12:26, 4 October 2021
  • Rb. Den Haag - 22/2601 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The Dutch Court of Den Haag determined which legislation was applicable to the calculation of damages in compensation for a data breach by a public administrative
    4 KB (429 words) - 09:29, 18 October 2023
  • Rb. Den Haag - AWB - 22 5012 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The Dutch District Court of Den Haag rejected two claims of immaterial damages filed against both the Dutch Tax Authority and the Dutch DPA. Among others
    6 KB (792 words) - 12:49, 23 May 2023
  • Rb. Den Haag - AWB - 19 6782 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The District Court of The Hague (Rb. Den Haag) ruled that Article 15 GDPR did not apply to a complainant's information that was held by the municipality
    13 KB (1,922 words) - 09:54, 28 October 2020
  • Rb. Den Haag - 20/2732 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The District Court Den Haag rejected a data subject’s claim that the city government had not provided all information within the scope of her access request
    12 KB (1,724 words) - 11:04, 17 May 2022
  • Rb. Den Haag - AWB - 20 5680 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The District Court of Den Haag held that a data subject’s right of access could be restricted by omitting the identity of third parties who reported them
    12 KB (1,765 words) - 15:30, 12 January 2022
  • Rb. Den Haag - SGR 19.5008 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    Rb. Den Haag - SGR 19.5008 Court: Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands) Jurisdiction: Netherlands Relevant Law: General Administrative Law Act Personal Data Protection
    16 KB (2,435 words) - 11:39, 10 September 2021
  • Rb. Den Haag - SGR 20/1516 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    Rb. Den Haag - AWB - 20 _ 1516 Court: Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands) Jurisdiction: Netherlands Relevant Law: Article 32(1) GDPR Article 32(2) GDPR Article
    14 KB (2,003 words) - 10:07, 10 September 2021
  • Rb. Den Haag - AWB - 20 4694 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The District Court of Den Haag held that the Consumentenbond had to be considered a stakeholder in a complaint against Google. The Dutch DPA ruled on an
    22 KB (3,313 words) - 16:18, 26 January 2022
  • Rb. Den Haag - C-09-608582-HA RK 21-101 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The District Court Den Haag considered that, although data subject’s appeal was admissible, the controller’s legitimate interests overrode the interests
    31 KB (4,916 words) - 10:19, 25 January 2022
  • Rb. Den Haag - EJ VERZ 21-85504 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The District Court of Den Haag held that a controller unlawfully processed the personal data of its employee and a client by recording a phone call, and
    37 KB (5,874 words) - 17:20, 23 February 2022
  • Rb. Den Haag - C-09-604682-KG ZA 20-1232 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    The Court of the Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag) rejected Privacy First's claim against the ultimate beneficial owners (UBO) register. According to the court
    46 KB (7,547 words) - 10:47, 24 March 2021
  • Rb. Den Haag - C/09/585239/ KG ZA 19/1221 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    safety. 2.7. On 9 April 2011, a shooting incident took place in Alphen aan den Rijn (hereafter referred to as: 'the shooting incident') in which seventeen
    77 KB (12,441 words) - 12:12, 4 October 2021
  • Rb. Den Haag - C/09/550982/HA ZA 18/388 (category Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands))
    Afrikaanderwijk in Rotterdam', 'WGA Vulnerable neighbourhoods Capelle aan den IJssel', 'WGA Rotterdam Bloemhof & Hillesluis' and 'WGA Haarlem Schalkwijk'
    128 KB (21,722 words) - 16:14, 10 March 2022
  • Court of Appeal Den Haag upheld the earlier decision by the Court of First Instance and rejected request for removal of the record with Credit Registration
    29 KB (4,710 words) - 12:25, 4 October 2021
  • 201905709/1/A3 European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:NL:RVS:2020:2559 Appeal from: Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands) Cases nos. 19/1962 and 19/1961 Appeal to: Unknown Original
    21 KB (3,425 words) - 12:57, 16 September 2021
  • Rb. Amsterdam - c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340 (category Rb. Amsterdam (Netherlands))
    rejected. 4.15. 4.15. With reference to the decision of the Court of Appeal of Den Bosch of 1 February 2018 (ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2018:363), [the applicant] took the
    25 KB (4,071 words) - 13:55, 20 September 2021
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)