Search results

Article 79 GDPR, margin number 14 (rdb.at 2018). Jahnel in Jahnel, DSGVO, Article 79 GDPR, margin number 29 (Jan Sramek 2021). See Recital 141 GDPR. Moos,

in other parts of the GDPR. To begin with, Recital 141 GDPR clarifies that an SA must “act on a complaint”. Article 57(1)(f) GDPR, in turns, establishes

under the GDPR and how the jurisdiction regime of the GDPR compares to that in the Brussels I bis Regulation2. 5.2. Recital 145 of the GDPR states: 'For

progress. Fill in the name used for the recital if you use it so we can ensure a somewhat streamlined practice. Recital 1: The protection of natural persons

Article 82 (1) and (2) GDPR, any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of a violation of the GDPR is entitled to compensation

para. of the GDPR, the law or regulation that constitutes the legal basis referred to in letters c) and e) of co. 1 of art. 6 of the GDPR, could contain

understood as made to the GDPR, in accordance with article 94 of the last. Likewise, it is apparent from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly

Thus, it violated Article 15 GDPR. The Datatilsynet issued an injunction and ordered the company, as foreseen under 58(2)(c) GDPR, to carry out a concrete

the fine under Article 83(2) GDPR. The data subjects complains about the violation of its right of access (Article 15 GDPR) by the Istituto Nazionale per

Article 16 sentence 1 GDPR is the legal basis for a request for rectification, even if the request has been submitted before the GDPR entered into force:

sense of an international jurisdiction rule. Recital22 This result is supported by Recital 145 of the GDPR, according to which in proceedings against controllers

able to check its legality (Recital 63 GDPR). The information must comply with the transparency requirement of Art 12 Para 1 GDPR, which requires that information

wrongly relied on the GDPR to redact documents. In this judgment, the Supreme Court clarified the relationship between the GDPR and domestic evidentiary

e) of the GDPR). 8.1.4. As for breaches of Articles 5.2. and 24 of the GDPR 88. Article 24.1 of the GDPR which covers Chapter IV of the GDPR devoted to

5-9 of the GDPR to press activities does not prevent the application of art. 17 GDPR to press activities; 2) art. 17 sec. 3 lit. a of the GDPR through its

95/46/EC (hereinafter: general data protection regulation or GDPR), and Article 6 (1) of the GDPR. 2. The Authority finds that Customer 1 violated the principle

Article 17(1)(d) GDPR since the data was unlawfully processed. The defendant claimed that its activities fall under exception in (Article 85 GDPR) read in conjunction

entitled to receive the information requested to ABN AMRO on the basis of the GDPR, considering they were not personal data. In the context of a litigation

meaning of the GDPR, and such processing of personal data did not fall within the scope of the "household exemption". Therefore, the GDPR applied in full

Letter f GDPR. It is true that the processing of personal data for direct mail can also represent a legitimate interest according to recital 47 GDPR. However