Search results

VG Ansbach - AN 14 K 19.01313 (category VG Ansbach (Germany))
with regard to the costs. The Administrative Court of Ansbach (Verwaltungsgericht Ansbach – VG Ansbach) upheld the data subject’s view. According to the court

13 KB (2,004 words) - 09:00, 23 August 2023
VG Ansbach - 14 K 19.01274 (category VG Ansbach (Germany))
decision could be brought to the Ansbach Administrative Court. 5 With a fax received by the Bavarian Administrative Court of Ansbach on July 1, 2019, the plaintiff

33 KB (5,554 words) - 11:06, 19 November 2021
VG Ansbach - AN 14 K 19.01274 (category VG Ansbach (Germany))
at the Ansbach Administrative Court. 5 The plaintiff brought the present action by fax received by the Bavarian Administrative Court in Ansbach on July

35 KB (5,807 words) - 14:24, 12 October 2022
VG Ansbach - AN 14 K 20.00083 (category VG Ansbach (Germany))
The Administrative Court of Ansbach held that the video surveillance of training areas in a gym was not lawful under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR and 6(1)(f) GDPR

36 KB (5,858 words) - 13:51, 16 May 2022
VG Ansbach - AN 14 K 22.00468 (category VG Ansbach (Germany))
in a written statement at the Administrative Court of Ansbach. The Administrative Court Ansbach overturned the DPA's decision. It held that the reprimand

38 KB (6,226 words) - 15:30, 18 January 2023
VGH München - 7 CE 20.1822 (category VGH München (Germany))
COVID-19, interest in information, health data, pandemic lower court: VG Ansbach, decision of 03.08.2020 - AN 14 E 20.1446 Place of discovery: BeckRS 2020

25 KB (3,916 words) - 12:37, 31 January 2022
VG Mainz - 1 K 584/19.MZ (category VG Mainz (Germany))
Art. 77, marginal no. 15; assuming a reduction of discretion to zero, VG Ansbach, judgement of 8 August 2019 - AN 14 K 19.00272 -, juris, marginal no.

58 KB (9,665 words) - 08:51, 25 November 2020
VG Schwerin - 1 A 1254/20 SN (category VG Schwerin (Germany))
exercise of discretion (cf. VG Ansbach, judgment of 8 August 2019 - 14 K 19.00272, BeckRS 2019, 30069 marginal no. 38 et seqq; cf. VG Mainz, judgment of 16 January

37 KB (6,156 words) - 10:12, 26 May 2021
VG Wiesbaden - 6 K 361/21.WI (category VG Wiesbaden (Germany))
plaintiff are administrative acts within the meaning of § 35 S. 1 HVwVfG (aA VG Ansbach, judgment of 16.3.2020 - AN 14 K 19.00464 – juris para. 15 without further

37 KB (6,025 words) - 16:24, 15 November 2023
VG Düsseldorf - 29 K 7031/19 (category VG Düsseldorf (Germany))
10 A 10613/20 -, juris Rn. 31 ff .; VG Ansbach, judgment of August 8, 2019 - AN 14. K 19.00272 -, juris Rn 42 ff .; VG Wiesbaden, judgment of June 7, 2021

27 KB (4,391 words) - 13:32, 20 November 2021
VG Mainz - 1 K 473/19.MZ (category VG Mainz (Germany))
the supervisory authority (cf. VG Mainz, judgement of 16 January 2020 - 1 K 129/19.MZ -, juris, marginal 35; VG Ansbach, judgement of 8 August 2019 - AN

31 KB (4,898 words) - 11:49, 19 April 2021
VG Osnabrück - 1 B 72/21 (category VG Osnabrück (Germany))
below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. VG Osnabrück, decision of December 17th, 2021

34 KB (5,527 words) - 13:49, 12 April 2022
VG Berlin - 1 K 391/20 (category VG Berlin (Germany))
adjudicating court (cf. VG Berlin, judgments of April 20, 2021 - VG 16 K 3/21, n.v.; of December 12, 2019 - VG 27 K 292.15; March 22, 2012 - VG 20 K 123.10) it

36 KB (5,768 words) - 14:17, 18 May 2022
LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen - L 16 SF 5/21 DS (category LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen (Germany))
Bf 279/17, juris Rn 63 ff; VG Schwerin, judgment of March 16, 2021 - 1 A 1254/20 SN Rn 65 ff; Administrative Court - VG Ansbach, judgment of March 16, 2020

34 KB (5,655 words) - 14:08, 16 May 2023