Search results

under section 7 (1) (2) of the Data Protection Act, as the data are processed directly due to the statutory tasks referred to in section 6 (1). Personal data

Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection Act, according to which insurance institutions may, despite the general prohibition in Article 9(1) GDPR, process

Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection Act, according to which insurance institutions may, despite the general prohibition in Article 9(1) GDPR, process

e7141c720c53441c2483c; has_js=1; _gid=GA1.2.1837808855.1597415922; _gat=1 Upgrade-Insecure-Requests 1 If-None-Match" 1597405902-1" Cache-Control max-age=0”

longer retention period will be respected (HE 206/2017 vp, pp. 29-30). Chapter 2, Section 10 (1) of the Accounting Act, on the other hand, requires that

statute of limitations as before. (HE 27/1999 vp, p. 20) Pursuant to Chapter 8, Section 3, Subsection 1 of the Criminal Code, the charge is deemed to have

information gathered, the DPA held that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 25(2) GDPR and Section 29(4) of the Finnish Data Protection

(Article 5(1)(c) GDPR). The Finish DPA ruled that the controller did not comply with the principle of data minimization set out in Article 5(1)(c) GDPR when

the National Data Protection Act (1050/2018), which has been applied since 1 January 2019. The Data Protection Act repealed the previously valid Personal

personal data in the tax information portals had in any case violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR, because the large-scale and permanent publication

matter must be resolved: (1) whether the controller has complied with the principle of data minimization set out in Article 5 (1) (c) and Article 25 (2)

basis: Art. 4 (1), (2), (7) and (8), Art. 5, Art. 44, Art. 46 (1) and (2) (c), Art. 51 (1), Art. 57 (1) (d) and (f), Art. 77 (1), Art. 80 (1) and Art. 93

***EMAIL.1> Date: Fri., 14 Dec. 2018 12:45 Subject: IRREVOCABLE DIMITION A.A.A. AND B.B.B. OF FOUNDATION SYNDROME 5P To: A.A.A. < ***EMAIL.1> , AA B.B

controller The matter has been clarified by the registrar on 16.11.2020, 7.1.2021 and 21.1.2021. According to the report received from the registrar on 16 November

for situations in which it is possible to process patient data. Article 5 (1) (b) of the TSA lays down the principle of purpose limitation, according to

6, Subsection 1, Clauses 1, 2 and 7 of the Data Protection Act, Article 9, Clause 1 of the Data Protection Regulation does not apply: 1) information obtained

not complied with Article 5, paragraph 1, subparagraph a (reasonableness of processing), Article 5, paragraph 1, subparagraph c (minimization of data)

the transmitted data (see point II.1.3 or II.1.3.1) at least in combination, personal data according to Art. 4 Z 1 DSGVO. For the lack of an appropriate

Consequently, the DPA found a violation of Article 5(1)(c) and (e), Article 25(2), Article 32(1)(d) and Article 32(2) GDPR. Share your comments here!

the Receipt Act. It should be noted, however, that according to section 3 (1) (1) of the Receipts Act, the Act on the Obligation to Provide Receipts in Cash