Article 48 GDPR: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Article 48 GDPR establishes conditions for recognizing and enforcing decisions of third country courts and administrative authorities in the EU. An ex-territorial judicial order to transfer or disclose personal data outside of the EU will not be recognized or enforced unless it is issued on the grounds of a valid international agreement between the relevant third country and the EU or a Member State. | Article 48 GDPR establishes conditions for recognizing and enforcing decisions of third country courts and administrative authorities in the EU. An ex-territorial judicial order to transfer or disclose personal data outside of the EU will not be recognized or enforced unless it is issued on the grounds of a valid international agreement between the relevant third country and the EU or a Member State. | ||
=== Judgment of a Court, Tribunal, or Administrative Authority of a Third Country === | ==== Judgment of a Court, Tribunal, or Administrative Authority of a Third Country ==== | ||
Article 48 GDPR relates only to binding orders issued by courts, tribunals or administrative authorities from third countries. Private enforcement, such as arbitral institutions, and orders issued within pre-trial proceedings, do not fall within this category. It is also not applicable for data processing in the context of an activity outside EU law or data processing by the Member States within the framework of the common foreign and security policy. | Article 48 GDPR relates only to binding orders issued by courts, tribunals or administrative authorities from third countries. Private enforcement, such as arbitral institutions, and orders issued within pre-trial proceedings, do not fall within this category. It is also not applicable for data processing in the context of an activity outside EU law or data processing by the Member States within the framework of the common foreign and security policy. | ||
=== | ==== Order to Transfer or Disclose Personal Data ==== | ||
This provision applies to situation where a court, tribunal or an administrative authority of a third country orders a controller or a processor to transfer or disclose personal data. The addressees of the decision should be subject to the GDPR or, in cases where they are not established in the EU, act within the material and territorial scope of the GDPR. | This provision applies to situation where a court, tribunal or an administrative authority of a third country orders a controller or a processor to transfer or disclose personal data. The addressees of the decision should be subject to the GDPR or, in cases where they are not established in the EU, act within the material and territorial scope of the GDPR. | ||
=== | ==== Enforcement Requires International Agreements or Mutual legal Assistance Treaties ==== | ||
Article 48 GDPR refers to international agreements or mutual legal assistance treaties that expressly cover the transfer of personal data. The conventions should be in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State. | Article 48 GDPR refers to international agreements or mutual legal assistance treaties that expressly cover the transfer of personal data. The conventions should be in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State. An example of such agreements is the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (the “Hague Convention”) that allows judicial authorities in one country to obtain evidence located in another one for use in judicial proceedings. Another example are transfers based on EU-US Agreement on the use and transfer of Passenger Name Records. | ||
=== Relation to Other Grounds for Transfer === | ==== Relation to Other Grounds for Transfer ==== | ||
The transfers based on other provisions of Chapter V, such as adequacy decisions, standard contractual clauses and binding corporate rules do not fall within the scope of this article. | The transfers based on other provisions of Chapter V, such as adequacy decisions, standard contractual clauses and binding corporate rules do not fall within the scope of this article. | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 4 March 2022
Legal Text
Any judgment of a court or tribunal and any decision of an administrative authority of a third country requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data may only be recognised or enforceable in any manner if based on an international agreement, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State, without prejudice to other grounds for transfer pursuant to this Chapter.
Relevant Recitals
Commentary
Article 48 GDPR establishes conditions for recognizing and enforcing decisions of third country courts and administrative authorities in the EU. An ex-territorial judicial order to transfer or disclose personal data outside of the EU will not be recognized or enforced unless it is issued on the grounds of a valid international agreement between the relevant third country and the EU or a Member State.
Judgment of a Court, Tribunal, or Administrative Authority of a Third Country
Article 48 GDPR relates only to binding orders issued by courts, tribunals or administrative authorities from third countries. Private enforcement, such as arbitral institutions, and orders issued within pre-trial proceedings, do not fall within this category. It is also not applicable for data processing in the context of an activity outside EU law or data processing by the Member States within the framework of the common foreign and security policy.
Order to Transfer or Disclose Personal Data
This provision applies to situation where a court, tribunal or an administrative authority of a third country orders a controller or a processor to transfer or disclose personal data. The addressees of the decision should be subject to the GDPR or, in cases where they are not established in the EU, act within the material and territorial scope of the GDPR.
Enforcement Requires International Agreements or Mutual legal Assistance Treaties
Article 48 GDPR refers to international agreements or mutual legal assistance treaties that expressly cover the transfer of personal data. The conventions should be in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State. An example of such agreements is the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (the “Hague Convention”) that allows judicial authorities in one country to obtain evidence located in another one for use in judicial proceedings. Another example are transfers based on EU-US Agreement on the use and transfer of Passenger Name Records.
Relation to Other Grounds for Transfer
The transfers based on other provisions of Chapter V, such as adequacy decisions, standard contractual clauses and binding corporate rules do not fall within the scope of this article.
Decisions
Case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, judgment of 6 October 2015 (Grand Chamber) (ECLJ;EU:C:2015:650).
→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 48 GDPR
References
Kuner, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 48 GDPR (Oxford University Press 2020).