Article 31 GDPR: Difference between revisions
Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
=== Cooperation === | === Cooperation === | ||
Article 31 GDPR establishes a legal obligation for controllers and processors, including their representatives, to cooperate with DPAs “''in the exercise of | Article 31 GDPR establishes a legal obligation for controllers and processors, including their representatives, to cooperate with DPAs “''in the exercise of'' [their] ''tasks''”. | ||
Under [[Article 57 GDPR|Article 57(1) GDPR]], each supervisory authority shall, among the others, “''monitor and enforce the application of this Regulation''” as well as “''conduct investigations on the application of this Regulation''”. Article 58(1) GDPR requires the controller and the processor “''to provide any information it requires for the performance of its tasks''”. Providing information can conflict with the right against self-incrimination. | Under [[Article 57 GDPR|Article 57(1) GDPR]], each supervisory authority shall, among the others, “''monitor and enforce the application of this Regulation''” as well as “''conduct investigations on the application of this Regulation''”. Article 58(1) GDPR requires the controller and the processor “''to provide any information it requires for the performance of its tasks''”. | ||
Providing information can conflict with the right against self-incrimination. | |||
In ''Orkem'', the CJEU clarifies<ref>CJEU, Case C-374/87, ''Orkem,'' 18 October 1989 (available [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61987CJ0374 here]).</ref> that “''documents, even with incriminating content, must be delivered''”.<ref>''Kotschy'', in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 31 GDPR, p. 628 (Oxford University Press 2020).</ref> | In ''Orkem'', the CJEU clarifies<ref>CJEU, Case C-374/87, ''Orkem,'' 18 October 1989 (available [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61987CJ0374 here]).</ref> that “''documents, even with incriminating content, must be delivered''”.<ref>''Kotschy'', in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 31 GDPR, p. 628 (Oxford University Press 2020).</ref> |
Revision as of 14:57, 2 June 2023
Legal Text
The controller and the processor and, where applicable, their representatives, shall cooperate, on request, with the supervisory authority in the performance of its tasks.
Relevant Recitals
Commentary
Article 31 stipulates a legal obligation for controllers and processors to cooperate with the supervisory authority.
Cooperation
Article 31 GDPR establishes a legal obligation for controllers and processors, including their representatives, to cooperate with DPAs “in the exercise of [their] tasks”.
Under Article 57(1) GDPR, each supervisory authority shall, among the others, “monitor and enforce the application of this Regulation” as well as “conduct investigations on the application of this Regulation”. Article 58(1) GDPR requires the controller and the processor “to provide any information it requires for the performance of its tasks”.
Providing information can conflict with the right against self-incrimination.
In Orkem, the CJEU clarifies[1] that “documents, even with incriminating content, must be delivered”.[2]
Violations of this obligation are punishable under Article 83(4)(a) GDPR, but proactive and good-faith behaviours can be taken into consideration by the DPA while deciding the amount of the administrative fine (Article 83(2)(f) GDPR).
Decisions
→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 31 GDPR