Banner1.jpg

Article 48 GDPR

From GDPRhub
Article 48 - Transfers or disclosures not authorised by Union law
Gdpricon.png
Chapter 10: Delegated and implementing acts

Legal Text


Article 48 - Transfers or disclosures not authorised by Union law

Any judgment of a court or tribunal and any decision of an administrative authority of a third country requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data may only be recognised or enforceable in any manner if based on an international agreement, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State, without prejudice to other grounds for transfer pursuant to this Chapter.

Relevant Recitals

Recital 102: International Agreements
This Regulation is without prejudice to international agreements concluded between the Union and third countries regulating the transfer of personal data including appropriate safeguards for the data subjects. Member States may conclude international agreements which involve the transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations, as far as such agreements do not affect this Regulation or any other provisions of Union law and include an appropriate level of protection for the fundamental rights of the data subjects.

Recital 115: Laws, Regulations and Other Legal Acts in Third Countries
Some third countries adopt laws, regulations and other legal acts which purport to directly regulate the processing activities of natural and legal persons under the jurisdiction of the Member States. This may include judgments of courts or tribunals or decisions of administrative authorities in third countries requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data, and which are not based on an international agreement, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State. The extraterritorial application of those laws, regulations and other legal acts may be in breach of international law and may impede the attainment of the protection of natural persons ensured in the Union by this Regulation. Transfers should only be allowed where the conditions of this Regulation for a transfer to third countries are met. This may be the case, inter alia, where disclosure is necessary for an important ground of public interest recognised in Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject.

Commentary

Whenever personal data processed in the EU are transferred or disclosed in response to a request from a third country authority, such transfer or disclosure is subject to the GDPR and constitutes a transfer in accordance with Chapter V of the GDPR. Accordingly, a legal basis under Article 6 GDPR is needed for the data processing as well as a ground for transfer under Chapter V.[1]

Article 48 GDPR is meant to ensure that a third country cannot make an unilateral decision that leads to the systematic transfer of personal data from the Union to that third country.[2]

While, according to the EDPB, Article 48 GDPR itself is not a ground for a transfer,[3] it establishes conditions for recognising and enforcing decisions from third-country courts and administrative authorities in the EU. An ex-territorial judicial order to transfer or disclose personal data outside of the EU will not be recognised or enforced unless it is issued on the grounds of a valid international agreement between the relevant third country and the EU or Member State.

EDPB Guidelines: For this Article see EDPB, 'Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1)(available here).

Judgment of a Court, Tribunal, or Administrative Authority of a Third Country

Article 48 GDPR relates only to binding orders issued by courts, tribunals or administrative authorities from third countries. Private enforcement, such as arbitral institutions, and orders issued within pre-trial proceedings, do not fall within this category. However, according to the EDPB, it makes no difference if the refusal to comply with the judgement or decision is subject to any adverse legal consequences or not.[4]

It is also not applicable for data processing in the context of an activity outside EU law, or data processing by the Member States within the framework of the common foreign and security policy.[5]

EDPB-icon.png

"Article 48 does not limit the purposes for which data may be requested by the third country authority. Thus, requests from third country authorities issued in different contexts and for different purposes would fall within the scope of the provision e.g. requests from law enforcement or national security authorities, financial regulators or public authorities responsible for approving pharmaceutical products."

EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 13.


Requiring [...] to Transfer or Disclose Personal Data

This provision applies to a situation where a court, tribunal or an administrative authority of a third country requires a controller or a processor to transfer or disclose personal data. The addressees of the decision should be subject to the GDPR or, in cases where they are not established in the EU, act within the material and territorial scope of the GDPR.

Enforcement Requires International Agreements or Mutual legal Assistance Treaties

According to Article 48 GDPR the above mentioned judgements and decisions "may only be recognised or enforceable in any manner, if based on an international agreement, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State".

Article 48 GDPR refers to international agreements or mutual legal assistance treaties that expressly cover the transfer of personal data. The conventions should be in force between the requesting third country, and the Union or Member State. An example of such agreements is the Hague Convention,[6] that allows judicial authorities in one country to obtain evidence located in another for use in judicial proceedings. Another example are transfers based on the EU-US Agreement on the use and transfer of Passenger Name Records.

EDPB-icon.png

"Furthermore, this request from a third country authority may only be recognised or made enforceable if it is based on an international agreement, which may give such request the effect of a legal obligation to which the controller is subject and non-compliance would have legal consequences. "

EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 19.


Article 6(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 6(3) GDPR could be an appropriate legal basis if there is an applicable international agreement in place which provides for a legal obligation for the controller to transfer or disclose personal data. However, if the international agreement does not provide for a legal obligation for the controller, other legal bases under Article 6 could be applicable.[7]

Without Prejudice to other Grounds for Transfer

It should be noted that Article 48 itself is not a ground for transfer.[8] It only specifies circumstances under which third-country judgements and decisions cannot be recognised or enforced in the Union. Therefore, a controller or processor must identify a ground for the transfer in Chapter V GDPR (as well as a legal basis under Article 6 GDPR).[9]

EDPB-icon.png

"Article 48 must be read in conjunction with Article 44, the general principle for transfers introducing the chapter. Article 44 lays down the following conditions for transfers under the GDPR: any transfer is subject to the other relevant provisions of the GDPR and complies with the conditions laid down in Chapter V (the two-step test)"

EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 27.


One such ground for a transfer could be a "legally binding and enforceable instrument between public authorities or bodies" in accordance with Article 46(2)(a) GDPR. Such an instrument could be international agreement in the sense of Article 48 GDPR.[10]

According to the EDPB, the wording "without prejudice to other grounds for transfer pursuant to this Chapter" means that another Article 46(2)(a) GDPR cannot be an applicable ground for a data transfer under Chapter V. Also, if an international agreement provides for a legal basis but does not contain appropriate safeguards, Article 46(2)(a) GDPR is not applicable as a ground for the data transfer.[11]

However, according to another opinion, Article 48 GDPR itself should be considered a ground for transfer under Chapter V GDPR.[12]

Decisions

→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 48 GDPR

References

  1. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 9 (available here).
  2. Zerdick, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DSGVO, Article 48 GDPR, margin number 1, (C.H. Beck 2024, 3rd Edition).
  3. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 29 (available here); in agreement e.g. Zerdick, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DSGVO, Article 48 GDPR, margin number 6 and 14, (C.H. Beck 2024, 3rd Edition); Schantz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 48 GDPR, margin numbers 1 (NOMOS 2025, 2nd Edition); opposing view: Knyrim, Gerhalter, in Knyrim, DatKomm, Article 48 GDPR, margin numbers 11 (Manz 2023).
  4. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 14 (available here).
  5. Kuner, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, p. 830 (Oxford University Press 2021).
  6. Convention on the taking of evidence abroad in civil or commercial matters. Opened for signature at The Hague on 18 March 1970 (available here).
  7. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 19 et seqq (available here).
  8. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 29 (available here); Zerdick, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DSGVO, Article 48 GDPR, margin number 6 and 14, (C.H. Beck 2024, 3rd Edition); Schantz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 48 GDPR, margin numbers 1 (NOMOS 2025, 2nd Edition).
  9. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 29 (available here).
  10. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 30 (available here).
  11. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR’, 2. December 2024 (Version 1), margin number 32 (available here).
  12. Knyrim, Gerhalter, in Knyrim, DatKomm, Article 48 GDPR, margin numbers 11 (Manz 2023).