VG Mainz - 1 K 467/19.MZ: Difference between revisions
From GDPRhub
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Article 6(1)(a) GDPR]] | [[Category:Article 6(1)(a) GDPR]] | ||
[[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]] | [[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]] | ||
[[Category:Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]] | [[Category:Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]] | ||
[[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]] | [[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]] | ||
[[Category:Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]] | [[Category:Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]] | ||
| Line 42: | Line 41: | ||
[[Category:Article 28 GDPR]] | [[Category:Article 28 GDPR]] | ||
§ 20 German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG) | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Decided:||10. 03. 2020 | |Decided:||10. 03. 2020 | ||
Revision as of 16:25, 29 April 2020
| VGH Baden-Wüttemberg - 1 S 397/19 | |
|---|---|
| Court: | VG Mainz (Germany) |
| Jurisdiction: | Germany |
| Relevant Law: | Article 4(15) GDPR
Article 6(1)(b) GDPR Article 6(1)(f) GDPR § 20 German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG) |
| Decided: | 10. 03. 2020 |
| Published: | n/a |
| Parties: | anonymous |
| National Case Number: | 1 S 397/19 |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal from: | n/a |
| Language: | German |
| Original Source: | [1] |
The Administrative Court of Mainz Wüttemberg ruled that...
English Summary
Facts
Lorem ipsum
Dispute
Lorem ipsum
Holding
The Court held that...
Comment
Share your comment here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the German original for more details.
DECISION
