VG Mainz - 1 K 467/19.MZ: Difference between revisions
From GDPRhub
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The Administrative Court of Mainz | The Administrative Court of Mainz ruled that... | ||
==English Summary== | ==English Summary== | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 29 April 2020
| VGH Baden-Wüttemberg - 1 S 397/19 | |
|---|---|
| Court: | VG Mainz (Germany) |
| Jurisdiction: | Germany |
| Relevant Law: | Article 4(2) GDPR
§ 20 German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG) |
| Decided: | 20. 02. 2020 |
| Published: | n/a |
| Parties: | anonymous |
| National Case Number: | 1 K 467/19.MZ |
| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:DE:VGMAINZ:2020:0220.1K467.19.00 |
| Appeal from: | n/a |
| Language: | German |
| Original Source: | Landesrecht Rheinland-Pfalz |
The Administrative Court of Mainz ruled that...
English Summary
Facts
Lorem ipsum
Dispute
Lorem ipsum
Holding
The Court held that...
Comment
Share your comment here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the German original for more details.
DECISION
