Article 31 GDPR: Difference between revisions
(style consistency) |
|||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
Article 31 stipulates a legal obligation for controllers and processors to cooperate with the supervisory authority. | Article 31 stipulates a legal obligation for controllers and processors to cooperate with the supervisory authority. | ||
=== Cooperation === | === Cooperation === | ||
Article 31 establishes a legal obligation for controllers and processors, including their representatives, to cooperate with the supervisory authority when exercising its tasks. | Article 31 GDPR establishes a legal obligation for controllers and processors, including their representatives, to cooperate with the supervisory authority when exercising its tasks. The provision clearly obligates controllers and processors to cooperate with DPAs “''in the exercise of its tasks''”. Under [[Article 57 GDPR|Article 57(1) GDPR]], each supervisory authority shall “''monitor and enforce the application of this Regulation''” as well as “''conduct investigations on the application of this Regulation''”. Article 58(1) GDPR requires the controller and the processor “''to provide any information it requires for the performance of its tasks''”. As Kotschy mentions, providing information can conflict with the right against self-incrimination. In this regard, ''Kotschy'' states, it follows from the CJEU decision ''Orkem'',<ref>CJEU, Case C-374/87, ''Orkem,'' 18 October 1989 (available [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61987CJ0374 here]).</ref> that “''documents, even with incriminating content, must be delivered''”.<ref>''Kotschy'', in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 31 GDPR, p. 628 (Oxford University Press 2020).</ref> Violations of this obligation are punishable under Article 83(4)(a) GDPR, but proactive and good-faith behaviours can be taken into consideration by the DPA while deciding the amount of the administrative fine ([[Article 83 GDPR|Article 83(2)(f) GDPR]]). | ||
==Decisions== | ==Decisions== | ||
→ You can find all related decisions in [[:Category:Article 31 GDPR]] | → You can find all related decisions in [[:Category:Article 31 GDPR]] |
Revision as of 10:42, 27 April 2022
Legal Text
The controller and the processor and, where applicable, their representatives, shall cooperate, on request, with the supervisory authority in the performance of its tasks.
Relevant Recitals
Commentary
Article 31 stipulates a legal obligation for controllers and processors to cooperate with the supervisory authority.
Cooperation
Article 31 GDPR establishes a legal obligation for controllers and processors, including their representatives, to cooperate with the supervisory authority when exercising its tasks. The provision clearly obligates controllers and processors to cooperate with DPAs “in the exercise of its tasks”. Under Article 57(1) GDPR, each supervisory authority shall “monitor and enforce the application of this Regulation” as well as “conduct investigations on the application of this Regulation”. Article 58(1) GDPR requires the controller and the processor “to provide any information it requires for the performance of its tasks”. As Kotschy mentions, providing information can conflict with the right against self-incrimination. In this regard, Kotschy states, it follows from the CJEU decision Orkem,[1] that “documents, even with incriminating content, must be delivered”.[2] Violations of this obligation are punishable under Article 83(4)(a) GDPR, but proactive and good-faith behaviours can be taken into consideration by the DPA while deciding the amount of the administrative fine (Article 83(2)(f) GDPR).
Decisions
→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 31 GDPR