Search results

EMKN A8 | The Health Personnel Act (1999) | The Personal Data Act (2000) | Disputes Act (2005) §20-2 | The Personal Data Act (2018) §1, GDPR A4, GDPR A5 (1)

2021, the Danish Data Protection Authority made a decision regarding the breach of personal data security. The Danish Data Protection Authority found that

2018 on Data Protection (Datenschutzgesetz, LR 235.1) (“the Data Protection Act”) implements the GDPR in the Liechtenstein legal order. 18 Article 15 of

to this transfer of data, the company compromises the level of protection of personal data of data subjects, as guaranteed in Article 44 of the GDPR. Consequently

use of Article 221, § 2, Data Protection Act the possibility that Article 83.7 GDPR offers the member states. Article 221, § 2, Data Protection Act determines:

HR-related) data concerning him was being processed, to provide a copy of his personal data and to restrict the processing of his personal data, while objecting

relating to the protection of personal data and the free movement of such data; Considering the law n o 78-17 of January 6, 1978 relating to data processing

responsibility for the protection of personal data to the data subject. The storage of personal data cannot be justified by the fact that the data subject may later

movements. Purchase data may also indirectly reveal personal data belonging to the special categories of personal data within the meaning of Article 9 GDPR. For

the legal protection of data controllers are stipulated in the National Data Protection Act. The disciplinary board consists of a data protection commissioner

special categories of personal data (Article 9 GDPR). The respondent argued that the TC String does not contain any personal data, that it does not constitute

website where data is collected personal data through multiple forms, only one informs about the treatment of data, violating data protection regulations

by the last amendment of the Federal Data Protection Act, by the second Act on the Adaptation of Data Protection Law of 20 November 2019. November 2019

Agency for Data Protection sanction with APERCIBIMIENTO to BBB, for an infringement of article 5.1.a) of the RGPD, as indicated in article 83.5 a) and

Spanish Data Protection Agency and on the basis of the following FACTS FIRST: On October 8, 2019, he joined this Spanish Agency Data Protection Department

paragraph of Article 49 of the Personal Data Protection Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 94/07-UPB1, hereinafter ZVOP-1) and Article 2 of

specifically processed data and a copy of this data was expressly refused. The data subject lodged a complaint with the data protection authority. The complainant

made by the Spanish Data Protection Agency. THIRD: On 10 March 2020, the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency Data Protection agreed to initiate

does not apply. Data Protection 23. The claimant relies on Article 82, as supplemented by s.168 of the Data Protection Act 2018. Article 82 of the UK-GDPR

December, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights (hereinafter, LOPDGDD), the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection is competent