Search results

provisions of the GDPR and references data processing on which the GDPR shall be applicable (§ 2 NDSG). It is more specific to the German Federal Data Protection

provide an overview over which sectors and issues will be prioritized. For 2019-2020 this overview can be found here (in SE). You can help us filling this section

first instance court against a decision taken by the EDPS. Should the decision be appealed by the data subject, this will then go to the Court of Justice (CJEU)

request, while without his or her active participation the complaint cannot be resolved; d) more than three years have passed from the event that is subject

pseudonymisation, which could be attributed to a natural person by the use of additional information should be considered to be information on an identifiable

Harbor and stated that, in order to be "adequate", the level of data protection offered by the third country should be “essentially equivalent” to that being

is an overriding public interest. They require a statutory basis that must be constitutional itself and comply with the principle of legal clarity under

section! You can help us filling this section! The EDPB public agenda can be found here. You can help us filling this section!

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The decision database can be found here. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us by

/2976 Online form submission No written signature required. Signature may be requested after submission Registration free of charge. No proof of knowledge

ongoing procedure and the results of a complaint procedure. Complaints can be filed in electronic form according to § 14(3) BDSG at bfdi.bund.de (in German)

complaints in the private sector within Baden-Württemberg. Complaints can be filed online on the LfDI's website. You can help us by filling in this section

filling in this section! The HmbBfDI provides a form here, but a complaint can be filed also with mail or encrypted e-mail. You can help us by filling in this

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The decision database can be found here, under "Resoluciones y Dictámenes más destacados del Consejo en

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The decision database can be found here. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us by

The CJEU held that consent must be given by a clear affirmative act. Not opting out of pre-ticked boxes was found to be insufficient to establish that consent

such information should not be known to internet users when he considers that it might be prejudicial to him or he wishes it to be consigned to oblivion, even

not to be assessed according to a risk-based approach ("all-or-nothing") could not be accepted. This was not in line with the GDPR and had to be seen against

compensation received under Article 82 GDPR must be regarded as ‘full and effective’, if it allows the damage to be compensated in its entirety, without there

[Hungarian version of Directive 95/46 to translate ‘data processing’] be considered to be equivalent to the usual term for data processing, “adatkezelés”, used