Search results

Authority fall within the jurisdiction of the courts. Article 13 (3) 29 a) point (aa), the Metropolitan Court of Budapest shall have exclusive jurisdiction. Article

according to Paragraph 3 of Art. 15 GDPR. Although the BGH expressed itself aaO. Rn. 17 such that a copy is made available, since the question of such a

relating to an identifiable natural person ("data subject"); identifiable by aa natural person who, directly or indirectly, in particular by an identifier

Criminal Court falls within the jurisdiction of the court. 13. § (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

enable, are not violated in their rights (§ 113 para. 1 sentence 1 VwGO). 21 aa) The legal basis of the contested decision is the provision of Section 25

13 (3) a) The General Court has exclusive jurisdiction under subparagraph (aa) of A Kp. Pursuant to Section 27 (1) (b), it is an administrative matter within

53ae ea195b4a6303a794024f943b780a7bcc53e4e237 5bb123241e708622c749354f6bf0aa974b50a85a a4e04c590badc8453e5c023b019497d0743706af f4dee9d5bf57d506aecb781f920e23df4addef42

if at least one of the conditions set out in Art. 6 (I) of the GDPR is met. aa) According to Art. 4 No. I GDPR, "personal data" means any information relating

is worthy of protection, outweighs the plaintiff's interest in information. aa) This follows from § 5 paragraph 1 sentence 2 IFG. According to this, special

the lawsuit is referred to in the Kp. § 13, subsection (3) a) Based on point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27, paragraph

above-mentioned circumstances, the Court, acting pursuant to Art. 151 of the AA, ruled on the dismissal of the complaint.

jurisdiction of the court, the lawsuit is subject to the Kp. 13. Paragraph 3 (a) (aa) the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

courts, the proceedings are governed by the Kp. § 13, paragraph (3), point a) aa) on the basis of subsection, the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent

referred to in the Kp. On the basis of § 13, paragraph (3) point a) point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. On the basis of

application. 33c) The application is unfounded because it is too broad. 34aa) Even if one assumes that the defendant's terms of use do not effectively

substantiated the fact that he suffered considerable damage. In detail: 49aa) 50The plaintiff is initially authorized to act. For his own claim, this is

responsible or the processor. 70a) The GDPR is applicable to the present case. 71aa) The temporal scope is open because the incident in dispute occurred after

reflected in this presentation: https://www.caa.si/upload/editor/file/filed7ed2aa0336d929.pptx IP further clarifies that, with respect to the use of drones

needs to be dealt with. Partial dispute costs 4.12. Pursuant to Article 1019aa Rv, the costs incurred by the person suffering loss or injury (in this case

months later, the City Hall awarded the contract to company D., patronized by AA. Jr. (photo), at the price of 230 lei/sqm/year, i.e. 59,800 lei annually.