Search results

obligation under the articles5 (1) (f), 5 (2), 15, 32 and 33 of the Regulation, as well as article 33 (1) (y) of Law 125 (1) / 2018and she was asked to submit

that BroBizz's processing of personal data was in accordance with Article 33 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. 1 and Article 34 (1). First The following

Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(f) GDPR Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No Violation Found Started: Decided: 06

insufficient took precautions to prevent the data breach b. Articles 33.1 and 33.5 and 34.1 GDPR, given that defendant did not mention it data breach to

E/08501/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: n/a Started: Decided: Published: 21.01.2020

Public Health Service of Madrid for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 25(1), 32 and 33 GDPR due to a website failure which resulted in the exposure of personal data

outcome of the survey n ° [...] carried out with the public establishment A 33/33

case. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 33 33/35 Regarding the seriousness of the offense, it already concurs as an aggravating

investigation to determine whether the Ministry of Tourism contravened Articles 33, 34 and 37 GDPR. First, the Ministry of Tourism argued that whilst it is the

properly respond to an access request, in violation of Articles 15(3) and 33 GDPR. The data subject made an access request to the controller, Vodafone

rambling, abstract explanations in the reasoning for the appeal (pages 12 to 33) were noted and examined, but were not considered to be definitive. They justify

and therefore lacked a legal basis. The Court also held that Articles 32 and 33 UAVG (Dutch law for the implementation of the GDPR) were the only provisions

Paragraph9 1. The fiscal remedy is inadmissible. Paragraph10 a. Pursuant to section 33(1) no. 1 of the Financial Court Code (Finanzgerichtsordnung - FGO), recourse

art. 24 sec. 1, art. 25 sec. 1, art. 32 sec. 1 lit. d, art. 32 sec. 2, art. 33 paragraph. 1 and art. 34 sec. 1 of the Regulation of the European Parliament

For its part, the security of personal data comes regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD, which regulate the security of the processing, notification

deleted when the purposes have been fulfilled (C‑553/07, EU:C:2009:293, point 33). It also held that each processing operation should be compliant with Articles

and officially notified the HDPA of the breach in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Corrective measures to fix the issue were also implemented. Despite

a warning to a local administration for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 32 and 33 GDPR. The administration had mistakenly published an Excel sheet containing

art. 28 sec. 3 lit. h, 32 sec. 1 lit. b and lit. d, art. 32 sec. 2, art. 33 paragraph. 1, art. 34 sec. 1 Regulation of the European Parliament and the

processed, or the unauthorized disclosure of or access to such data. Article 33.1 of the RGPD states the following: In the event of a breach of the security