Search results

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the complaint of XXXX

principles of the so-called Stolpe case-law (BVerfG, order of 25 October 2005, 1 BvR 1696/98), which the plaintiff invokes in a written statement of 20 October

vicinity Train station in W... are the lawyers from the law firm G...-D... Rechtsanwälte... 35 https://www.rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-w....de/achten-agg-hoppe

not, the main Subject to legal proceedings (see OLG Karlsruhe 16.02.2011 - 4 W 108/10 - Rn.17) - 4 - a) In view of the specific circumstances of the individual

13/2005 DSG Art. 2 § 9 valid from January 1st, 2000 to March 31st, 2005 saying W274 2243598-1/10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative Court

advice in order to be clarified. According to §§ 2 Para. 2, 13 RVG No. 2300 W RVG, the claim amounts to €1,029.35. Since the cross-appeal does not attack

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

of 28.04.2020 - 1 S 1068/20 -, and of 30.04.2020 - 1 S 1101/20 -, each m.w.N.). In view of this, the provision in Section 3 (1) sentence 3 CoronaVO on

Innsbruck Higher Regional Court as court of appeal of 22 August 2019, GZ 2 R 96/19p-36, thus reversing the judgment of the Regional Court Feldkirch of 9

www.bvwg.gv.at decision date 03.02.2022 business number W214 2224204-1/28E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through

9 ff). for the use of a website requires prior consent (cf. Article 29 -, W, P, Opinion 04/2012 on Cookie Consent Exemption, WP 194, 00879/12/EN p. 9 ff)

December 1, 2018, rdb.at), see also BVwG November 23, 2020, W211 2227144-1; BVwG 8/13/2021, W211 2222613-1. But even with a direct applicability of Art.

for an amount of 2,175.00 euros and 2,713.00 euros. It also provides a CD-R containing the recording of the telephone conversation maintained with the

is mandatory in proceedings before the Metropolitan Court. I N D O C U L A R Y I. The Application (1) On 9 February 2022, the applicant filed a complaint

in: Zöller, code of civil procedure, 33rd edition 2020, § 56 ZPO, para. 8 m.w.N.). 31Since the authenticity of the document, by means of which the authorization

Reply to the CNPD. Cf. ibid. "Cf. information available on Elias /'Vor/dão r Ora/find-or4 and attached to the case file as Document "worldcoin - Data collection

plaintiff, but generally with the credit institutions according to §§ 675 v -675 w BGB. § 675 v BGB is the central liability standard in the legal relationship

no. 19 - 20, juris; differently, however, Senate, decision of 19.4.2021 - 4 W 243/21 -, juris). However, this can also be left aside here, because the risk

(BGH ruling of April 9, 2014 - VIII ZR 404/12 = BeckRS 2014 , 9743 Rn. 23 m.w.N.; Grüneberg/Grünberg, BGB commentary, 81st edition 2022, § 305 Rz. 4). In

organizing body above the school Z and the Vrij Centrum for it pupil guidance W, but since a CLB must be able to act independently, they appear to be acting