Search results

corresponding interest can be found in the GDPR. Notably, the PG referenced Recital 52 and Article 9 GDPR. Recital 52 GDPR states that a derogation from the prohibition

6(1)(a) GDPR as well as Article 13(1) ePrivacy directive. The DPA examined the possibility of invoking legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR as a

legitimise an exchange of personal data (following BVerfGE 130, 151 [184]). (recital 46)2. § Article 14.2 and Article 15.5 sentence 4 in conjunction with In

damage. As can be seen from recital 146 sentence 3 of the GDPR, the concept of damage is to be interpreted broadly. Recital 75 GDPR cites as examples of damage

According to the respondent, the GDPR in fact implements Article 52 of the Charter and this follows from recital 4 of the GDPR. It considered that: “the processing

Letter a GDPR). (Article 58 Paragraph One Litera a, GDPR). From this provision, taken together with Article 31 of the GDPR, Article 31 of the GDPR results

processing (Art. 18 GDPR), Right to data portability (Art. 20 GDPR) and Right to object (Art. 21 GDPR). The right of access under Art. 15 GDPR cannot be "detached"

Article 82(1) GDPR, because the controller unlawfully disclosed the data to its customers. The court also held that under Article 82 GDPR the violation

with GDPR transparencyobligations under Article 13(1)(c) GDPR involves a separateand different legalassessment tothatrequired in Article6(1)(b) GDPR.TheIE

processed expect". 70. In that sense, the Conciliation Chamber also refers to recital 47 AVG: "the interests and the fundamental rights of the person concerned

but only to a very limited extent. In its judgement of 9 November 2010, C-92/09 and C-93/09, it held in margin no. 53 that the scope of protection is in

Article 81 of the GDPR, but not the actually relevant Article 82 of the GDPR. The claims asserted in the counterclaim under Article 82 of the GDPR were confirmed

standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 DSG §4 GDPR Art 12 GDPR Art 15 GDPR Art 15 Paragraph 1 litc GDPR Art77 UWG §26b paragraph 1 B-VG Art. 133 today

data within the meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR and thus cannot be object of an access request under Article 15(3) GDPR. Making reference to CJEU case C-434/16

legitimate within the meaning of the GDPR? Taking into account both the relevant national provisions and provisions of the GDPR, the Federal Administrative Court

(Article 5(2) GDPR), of engagement of a processor (Article 28 GDPR), and in respect of the security of processing of personal data (Article 32 GDPR). However

1, f) GDPR. II.4. Violation of Article 12(1) and (4) of the GDPR, Article 17 of the GDPR, Article 24(1) of the GDPR and Article 25 (1) of the GDPR 55. The

of the GDPR by the controller, the DPA issued a fine of €12.100 in accordance with Article 83(4) GDPR, Article 83(5) GDPR and Article 83(6) GDPR. Both the

12(5)(1) GDPR apply. However, it leaves open whether the material scope of application of the GDPR is opened or not opened due to Article 2(2)(a) GDPR. In any

lines and under f, of the GDPR. 14. For a successful appeal to Article 6, paragraph 1, opening lines and under f, of the GDPR, three conditions must be