Search results

From GDPRhub
  • NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH/2020/5553 (category Article 12(3) GDPR)
    request under Article 15 and with the one month deadline under Article 12(3). Was Google Ireland Ltd in breach of its obligations under GDPR Article 15(1) and
    27 KB (4,279 words) - 10:12, 17 November 2023
  • AEPD (Spain) - E/00113/2019 (category Article 4(11) GDPR)
    timetable" "B.- In accordance with Article 67 of the GDPR, the Inspectorate of the AEPD, in accordance with Article E/0113/2019, carried out the following
    27 KB (4,497 words) - 13:38, 13 December 2023
  • OLG Naumburg - 9 U 6/19 (category Article 9(1) GDPR)
    gross turnover per article sold. 35. On March 25, 2019, the plaintiff had his appeal substantiated by another attorney of record: 36. Article 9 of the DSGVO
    32 KB (5,236 words) - 16:00, 10 March 2022
  • CNIL (France) - SAN-2020-013 (category Article 6 GDPR)
    derogant rule, based on the interpretation of Article 95 GDPR in the line of the Rec (173) GDPR and Article 1(2) and 15a of the ePrivacy Directive. The CNIL
    82 KB (13,424 words) - 17:10, 6 December 2023
  • violated Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) GDPR. Pursuant
    77 KB (12,352 words) - 07:20, 23 April 2024
  • AEPD (Spain) - PS/00127/2020 (category Article 13 GDPR)
    information duty included in Article 13 GDPR. Is this a violation of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that there had been a violation of Article 13. According to the
    35 KB (5,363 words) - 14:02, 13 December 2023
  • CNIL (France) - SAN-2020-003 (category Article 5(1)(c) GDPR)
    breaches of articles 5-1-c), 5 -1 e), 13, 32 and 35-1 of the GDPR; no breach of Article 6 of the GDPR and of Directive 2002/58 / EC of the Parliament and
    61 KB (10,028 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
  • Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2023/AR/801 (category Article 96 GDPR)
    Appeal considered that Article 96 GDPR does not provide a time limit for the validity of international agreements concluded prior GDPR and that a ban on some
    11 KB (1,467 words) - 09:40, 6 July 2023
  • DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.101.211 (category Article 4(15) GDPR)
    to be qualified as a health data pursuant to Article(4)(15) GDPR and that the scope of protection of Article 9(2) must be taken into account as a standard
    37 KB (5,745 words) - 13:53, 12 May 2023
  • BAG - 9 AZR 383/19 (category Article 38(3) GDPR)
    force of the GDPR, the controller also sent him a separate revocation letter referring to the operational reasons under Article 38(3) GDPR, second sentence
    40 KB (6,019 words) - 14:13, 28 November 2023
  • Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N (category Article 4(11) GDPR)
    minimisation under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, and contrary to the obligation to obtain the freely given consent of the data subject under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, when refusal
    43 KB (6,749 words) - 07:07, 28 October 2021
  • OGH - 6Ob127/20z (category Article 4(1) GDPR)
    held that a lawsuit under Article 79 GDPR regarding the alleged violation of Article 15 GDPR is indeed feasible. Article 79 GDPR is not limited to certain
    34 KB (5,408 words) - 13:57, 20 September 2021
  • RvS - 201902417/1/A2 (category Article 6(1)(e) GDPR)
    time, which is a violation of the GDPR. As to the claim for damages, the CoS notes that though Article 82(1) of the GDPR states that full compensation for
    37 KB (5,721 words) - 12:41, 16 September 2021
  • APD/GBA (Belgium) - 04/2021 (category Article 7 GDPR)
    processing (Article 4, point 11, Article 6 (1) in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR) 121. With regard to the lawfulness of the processing (art. 6 GDPR), the defendant
    113 KB (18,732 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
  • APD/GBA (Belgium) - 36/2021 (category Article 83(7) GDPR)
    approved appeal of Article 5(1)(a), Article 12(1), Article 13(1) and Article 13(2). The appeal for Article 5(1)(c), Article 6(1) and Article 8 GDPR was not approved
    62 KB (9,417 words) - 16:57, 12 December 2023
  • obligations under Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 of GDPR. Article 5 (1) : Ticketmaster has failed to comply with the requirements of GDPR including to process
    130 KB (21,195 words) - 13:52, 25 April 2021
  • (referred to in Article 9 of the GDPR) or of "personal data relating to criminal convictions and offenses" (referred to in Article 10 of the GDPR)" ( note cit
    49 KB (7,758 words) - 15:44, 6 December 2023
  • relation to contraventions of the UK-GDPR, section 168 DPA 2018 provides that "non-material damage" in Article 82 GDPR includes distress. In relation to breaches
    61 KB (8,986 words) - 08:40, 22 February 2022
  • AP (The Netherlands) - 14.01.2022 (category Article 5(1)(c) GDPR)
    2019 Pursuant to article 58, second paragraph, opening words and article 83, fifth paragraph, of the GDPR, read in in connection with article 14, third paragraph
    50 KB (7,656 words) - 17:05, 12 December 2023
  • the personal data to be provided pursuant to Article 15(1) GDPR: must Article 15(3) first sentence of the GDPR be interpreted as meaning that, due to the
    51 KB (8,592 words) - 07:03, 2 November 2021
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)