Search results

April 2020 regarding [plaintiff] living at [place], plaintiff, Agent: Mr. M.M.J. Arts, by The foundation FOUNDATION NIJESTEE, having its registered office

they requested an inspection of the complaint file, on 12/28/2023 at 9 a.m. 1.2.7 On 12/30/2022, I re-approved the requested extension of time and informed

Instagram, etc.) and WhatsApp. […] FIRST.- On January 6, 2022, around 3 a.m., he was in the ***ADDRESS.1, with his dog (…). My client (…) found himself

of access to administrative documents, pursuant to law no. 241/90 and ss. m. and i., in the manner indicated therein, and not through the instrument of

the requirements of other provisions of the Act have been violated, e.g. á m. Paragraph 1 Article 7 the same law on, among other things, fairness, proportionality

operating room report or birth registration. l) The pathological anatomy report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

object was granted on that issue, as well as access to relevant data, i.e. on m. out of a case due to the aforementioned complaint of the Consumers' Association

Karlsruhe, judgment of 02.08.2019 - 8 O 26/19, ZD 2019, 511, 512; LG Frankfurt a.M., Judgment of 18.01.2021 - 30 O 147/20, cited after Leibold, ZD-Aktuell 2021

within two weeks of the date of this decision. This decision was made by mr. M.G.J.M. van Kempen, chairman, and mr. R. den Ouden and mr. V.F.R. Woeltjes, in

complaints (with items G.D.1 to G.D.7 and G.E.71 in the Appendix) e) PLEGMA NET M.E.P.E. (henceforth GRID): seven (7) complaints (with G.E.1 to G.E.7 details

organized according to functional or geographical aspects". According to the H.M., this term is essentially equivalent to the term file used in the predecessor

at www.bvwg.gv.at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 4 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 3 2 2 2 6 2 6 1 - 1/8 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

by mr. J.J. Catsburg, chairman, and mr. P.J.M. Mol and mr. A.A.M. Elzakkers, members, in the presence of mr. M.L. Bressers, clerk. The verdict was pronounced

residence] , claimant (Agent: J.H.P.M. Raaijmakers), and the Minister of Finance, defendant (Agents: J.L. Lam MSc LL.M. and I.H.H.L. Kolthof). Process sequence

any further decision. This decision was made by Mrs. M.F.J.N. van Osch, M.P.C.J. van Bavel and H.M.J. van den Hurk and was pronounced in public in the presence

grade was formed. In the reply sent by e-mail on June 24, 2021 at 10:19 p.m., the Representative requested the date of entry or modification of all the

that the rights and freedoms of those employees are taken into account. J.M. (the data subject), a former employee and a customer of a bank in Finland

defense. The hearing took place on October 12, 2020. Its directors M. Hoffer and M. Balken, and its agents, appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. The defendant

June 28, 2018, 60798/10 and 65599/10, M.L. and W.W. t. Germany, §104. 12 ECtHR June 28, 2018, 60798/10 and 65599/10, M.L. and W.W. t. Germany, §104. 13 Decision

personal data by V.M.P. Sp. z o.o. based in W, President of the Office for Personal Data Protection by establishing an infringement by V.M.P. Sp. z o.o. with