Search results

out in Article 6 (1) of the GDPR In addition, there is a circumstance within the meaning of Article 9 (2) of the GDPR. (45) Article 9 (2) of the GDPR does

protection impact assessment prior to the use of the drones, as provided in Article 35 GDPR. In addition, the IP clarified that the Civil Aviation Agency of the

18a section 1 and art. 35 section 3 point 5 of the Act on and art. 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland; 7) art. 35 section 1 and 3 in connection

of Article 6(1)(e) are met. II.2. Article 5 of the GDPR, Article 24(1) of the GDPR and Article 25(1) and (2) of the AVG II.2.1. Article 5 (2) GDPR, Article

processing. In accordance with Article 36 GDPR, the Garante must decide on the adequacy of the intended processing under the GDPR. After careful examination

enshrined in Article 25 GDPR. Additionally, the AEPD concluded that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, noting that although the GDPR does not

DI-2019-7782 4 (22) infringements of Article 5 (1) (a), Article 6 (1), Article 9 (2), Article 13, Article 35 and Article 36 of the Data Protection Ordinance

thereby violating Article 13(2) GDPR. The investigated controllers did not comply with the storage limitation principle under Article 5(1) GDPR because the data

right to erasure (“right to be forgotten”) of Article 17 GDPR and Article 19 of Regulation 2018/1725. Under GDPR, such prolonged and unrestricted data retention

to be heard by the Authority, within 30 days (Article 166, paragraphs 6 and 7, of the Code, and Article 18, paragraph 1, by Law No. 689 of 24/11/1981)

DPO and to cooperate with the DPA, therefore violating Article 31 GDPR and Article 37(1)(a) GDPR. On 2 June 2021, the French DPA (“CNIL”) informed a French

breached Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. Therefore, the DPA handed down a 'call to order' against the joint controllers for breaching Article 5(1)(b) GDPR, and no

at least four dates where there are suggestions this may have occurred. 1.7 WMP are unable to demonstrate that inaccurate personal data was rectified without

violates § Article 13 (3) in conjunction with Article 62 (1) 4 DSG and for the period prior to 25 May 2018 against Article 52 Paragraph 2 no. 7 in conjunction

valid and compatible with Article 16 TFEU and – as regards Article 3(5) and (6) – with Article 21 TFEU, as well as with Articles 7, 8 and 52 of the Charter

risk of Page 7 The Data Inspectorate DI-2019-7024 7 (31) rights and freedoms of natural persons. This includes in accordance with Article 35 (3) b that an

data has infringed Article 5, Article 9, Article 35 and Article 36 of the Data Protection Regulation. These articles are covered by article 83.4 and 83.5 and

Childrens and Education Board 300,000 SEK (around €26,524) for breaching Article 35(1) GDPR. The Board failed to conduct a data protection impact assesment prior

violation of Article 24(1) and (2) GDPR (responsibility of the controller), Article 25 GDPR (privacy by design and by default) or of Article 32 GDPR (obligation

violation of Article 35 GDPR. In light of the above violations, the DPA imposed an administrative fine of €55,000 (Article 58(2)(i) GDPR). In doing so