Search results

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

the Spanish DPA concluded that there was an infringement of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32(1) of the GDPR. The complainant received a notification from Consellería

said action is not would have been carried out in accordance with arts. 5.1.f) and 32 of the GDPR, a request that is denied through Resolution dated 12/24/2021

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

the complained party, with according to the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Pro- Common Administrative Assignment

SAW Article 5.1. f) GDPR Article 5.1.f) “Principles relating to processing” of the GDPR establishes: "1. The personal data will be: (…) f) treated in such

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the following

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

the claimed party, in accordance with the provided in articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, when appreciating reasonable indications of violation of the provisions

adjusted to the provisions of article 68 of the LOPDGDD and article 64.2 of the LPACAP (in this case, of the different corrective powers provided for in

Description of the impression provided: . Header: Addressed to GOOGLE LLC by F.F.F., on 01/03/2019, as as a result of a court ruling. C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd

b) of the aforementioned Regulation. For the purposes specified in the art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Common Administrative Procedure of Public

a violation of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32 GDPR. Finally, the DPA reprimanded the controller for violations of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32 GDPR. According to national

28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 5/26 hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD and article 32 of the RGPD, typified

publication to have been lawful due to the legitimate interest (per Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) it pursued. However, in June 2020 the claimant provided evidence to

83.5.b) of the RGPD. " FOURTH: THAT for the purposes provided for in art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public

IV Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR Article 5.1.f) “Principles relating to processing” of the GDPR states: “1. Personal data shall be: (…) f) processed in a