Search results

constitute personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR? If so, do they qualify as special categories of personal data under Article 9 GDPR? Is the defendant obliged

obligations that follow from Article 12, 13, 14 and 26 GDPR, although this competence does not directly follow from Article 35 of the General Data Protection

impact" for the purposes of Article 35 GDPR, and (2) "insufficient documentary evidence" that an "effective" infringement of the GDPR had taken place. In reaching

However, the Fiscal Court applied Article 15 Paragraph 3 GDPR (see 3.) and Article 12 Paragraph 5 Sentence 2 and Sentence 3 GDPR (see 4.) incorrectly. Due to

consultation. of the Guarantor pursuant to article 36 of the Regulation "(article 110 of the Code, article 9, paragraph 2, letter j) and par. 4 of the

constitute a valid legal basis in line with Article 6(1)(e) GDPR, Article 6(2) and (3) GDPR nor with Article 9(2)(g) GDPR. Making reference to case law of the

under the GDPR and needs to establish a valid legal basis to process personal data. Unsolicited political communication is regulated with Article 11 L. 3471/2006

processing lack any applicable conditions found in Article 9(2) GDPR and was found in breach of Article 5(2) GDPR. Additionally, the Garante reiterated that the

(1) lit. d GDPR. The procedure was also compatible with the principle of purpose limitation within the meaning of Article 5 para. 1 lit. b GDPR. In September

Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings concerned a Luxembourg

condition of necessity is maintained under Article 6.1 b) to f) of the GDPR. The article 6.1 of the GDPR replaces Article 7 of the Directive, without the relevant

and transferred to the Disputes Chamber pursuant to article 62, § 1 j° article 92, 1° WOG. 10. On 7 February 2020, the Disputes Chamber invites the parties

in Article 17 GDPR (cf. Article 17 (3) b GDPR). In that case, the data subject does not have the right to object as referred to in Article 21 GDPR, because

company was not compliant with Article 13 GDPR. The CNPD held that the controller infringed Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR and decided to: - impose

to the right of access under Article 15(4) of the GDPR or section 22 of the DDPA can be invoked. It follows from Article 15 (4), that the right to obtain

his claim on Article 78(1) of the GDPR in conjunction with Article 57 of the GDPR. Article 57 of the GDPR. The scope of Article 57 of the GDPR is indeed open

under Article 17(3) GDPR. Two doctors sued a platform for deletion of their basic profile set up on the platform without their consent under Article 17 GDPR

the media reports referred to in the article available under the above-mentioned address. In the indicated article, marked with the publication date [.

storage (Article 5.1.b, 5.1.c, 5.1.d and 5.1.e of the GDPR); - Violation of the principle of legality (article 5.1.a of the GDPR); - Violation of Article 10

invoked the excessiveness of the request under Article 12(5) GDPR alleging that the data subject uses Article 15 GDPR only to verify the validity of the premium