Search results
From GDPRhub
- Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2020/AR/1111 (category Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)X to lead to dereferencing.References to case-law decisions of the Court of Justice (which the Court ofmarkets does not question), justify the theory,37 KB (5,919 words) - 08:54, 20 August 2021
- UKUT (AAC) - Leave.EU and Eldon v Information Commissioner (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)was not satisfied; the decision to issue the assessment notices was lawful. These were grouped into four broad headings by the court, which in turn assessed11 KB (1,457 words) - 16:05, 3 December 2021
- establishment has the power to enforce those decisions, in which case the establishment which has taken such decisions shall be regarded as the principal establishment90 KB (14,556 words) - 17:08, 6 December 2023
- act as Concerned Supervisory Authorities (CSA) next to the Slovak DPA: Ireland (Irish Data Protection Commissioner -DPC), Sweden (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten17 KB (2,189 words) - 12:34, 3 August 2022
- that this articulation was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its PLANET49 decision of 1 October 2019 (C-613/17). In doing so, the93 KB (14,936 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
- DSB’s communications as decisions, this would mean that the BVwG would have to decide on the legality of a decision by the Irish DPC. In this context the67 KB (10,619 words) - 10:40, 22 January 2024
- --Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=32 KB (6,006 words) - 16:33, 7 July 2021
- --Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=34 KB (5,924 words) - 18:14, 20 April 2021
- EDPB - Binding Decision 4/2022 - 'Meta (Instagram)' (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the Binding Decision. Please note: When describing Issues 1-3, it is necessary to explain the proposals in the Irish DPA’s Draft Decision, in order to468 KB (51,340 words) - 14:10, 30 January 2023
- form of a common decision taken by two or more entities or result from converging decisions by two or more entities, where the decisions complement each127 KB (21,484 words) - 17:01, 12 December 2023
- that the Irish DPA was instead the competent authority under the one stop shop mechanism. Material competence of the French DPA This decision revolves82 KB (13,463 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- DPA forwarded the complaint to the Irish DPA as the main establishment of Facebook in Europe is in Ireland. The Irish DPC forwarded the complaint to Facebook11 KB (1,725 words) - 09:56, 12 November 2021
- referred a case to the Irish DPA regarding Facebook transfers of data to third parties. The Irish DPA rejected the case, since Ireland has not implemented17 KB (2,419 words) - 14:27, 24 November 2022
- Digitaliseringsstyrelsen - Decision against Google of 30 October 2023 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)of 16 The EU Court subsequently clarified in C-210/16 (Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein), that the fact that: ”[…] strategic decisions with regard52 KB (8,025 words) - 05:01, 23 November 2023
- Frankfurt am Main 8 März 2012 (highest regional court, second highest in German court system), the court considers a site where one can rank doctors according144 KB (23,058 words) - 18:48, 5 March 2022
- DPC - In the matter of Twitter International Company (IN-19-1-1) (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Having received submissions by Twitter, the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) proceeded to set out his provisional views as to whether, in notifying10 KB (1,404 words) - 07:47, 19 October 2021
- Deely v Information Commissioner (category High Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)appeal this decision at the Irish High Court, pursuant to section 42 of the 1997 Act. Did the High Court have the remit to address the decisions made by the3 KB (332 words) - 21:41, 11 April 2021
- Court of Appeal - 2020/123 (category Court of Appeal (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Act 1988. The DPC appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision. The Court decided that: 1. The data subject64 KB (9,589 words) - 16:15, 1 June 2022
- English original for more details. Adopted 1 Decision 01/2020 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding Twitter183 KB (30,819 words) - 09:50, 20 January 2023
- GDPR. This Binding Decision concerns the dispute arisen following a draft decision (hereinafter, “Draft Decision”) issued by the Irish supervisory authority276 KB (38,206 words) - 09:46, 20 January 2023