Search results
From GDPRhub
- Article 52 GDPR (section In the context of mutual assistance, cooperation and participation in the EDPB)under Article 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("CFR"), Article 16(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union47 KB (5,594 words) - 22:45, 1 April 2024
- necessary by the Commissioner for the purposes of the investigation 4. Following the conclusion of the investigation, you will be informed of the outcome.4 KB (483 words) - 08:17, 12 July 2022
- Authority for the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the private sector in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia4 KB (372 words) - 10:45, 22 September 2021
- referenced in all documents. The individual employee decides on behalf of the Slovak DPA. The head of the Slovak DPA is the President of the Office for Personal9 KB (1,006 words) - 07:13, 7 July 2021
- Data Protection in Germany (section BfDI (Federal DPA))counter the risk of violating the general right of personality. Context According to the provisions of the Census Law, a census in the form of a total18 KB (1,831 words) - 13:49, 3 November 2022
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2019-31-2071 (category Article 15(3) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)July 2019, the data subject filed a complaint about the controller's answer at the DPA. The DPA continued to review the case. First, the DPA reprimanded26 KB (3,820 words) - 16:22, 6 December 2023
- within the scope of Article 100(3) ZVOP-2 in relation to Article 100(1)(2) ZVOP-2 for infringing general provisions on video surveillance. The DPA noted6 KB (645 words) - 10:59, 31 January 2024
- Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/02136 (category Article 3(2) GDPR) (section (a) the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement taking into account the nature scope or purpose of the processing concerned as well as the number of data subjects affected and the level of damage suffered by them)relevant in the present case. The NO DPA rejects Grindr's argument according to which the interpretation of the article violated was not clear. The NO DPA confirms18 KB (2,375 words) - 16:17, 6 December 2023
- for the data transfer referred to in item 2.a). 3) The complaint against the respondent to the second complaint on the grounds of a violation of the general108 KB (17,097 words) - 13:52, 12 May 2023
- CJEU - C-230/14 - Weltimmo (section Was the processing carried out 'in the context of [Weltimmo's] activities' in Hungary?)circumstances, of the use of those data for the purpose of the invoicing of the advertisements after a period of one month." It referred to the Lindqvist and13 KB (1,888 words) - 13:07, 1 June 2023
- CNIL (France) - SAN-2022-020 (category Article 3(2)(a) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)fifteen, of which the controller was fully aware, according to the DPA. Fine The DPA imposed a fine of 800,000 euros on the controller. The amount of the fine59 KB (9,566 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- DI-2020-11373 2(23) Date: 2023-06-30 2.2.1 Applicable regulations, etc. ................................................... .....9 2.2.2 The Privacy Protection113 KB (12,773 words) - 15:20, 6 December 2023
- article 3 of the French Data Protection Act because the use of cookies is carried out within the framework of the activities of the company Google France which93 KB (14,936 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-431-0061 (Helsingor decision no. 1) (category Article 5(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)high. . The warning shall be issued in accordance with Article 58 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. 2, letter a. If the assessments of the risk made48 KB (7,442 words) - 10:24, 12 September 2022
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-431-0061 (Helsingor decision no. 3) (category Article 58(2)(f) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Article 36(1), the ban is effective until the DPA has provided such consultation as per Article 36(2) or the DPA otherwise permits the processing until117 KB (18,075 words) - 10:19, 12 September 2022
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-431-0061 (Helsingor decision no. 2) (category Article 5(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)in line with the GDPR. Furthermore, until the Municipality of Helsingor complies with the GDPR, the DPA suspended transfers of data to the United States75 KB (11,733 words) - 16:33, 21 August 2022
- CJEU - C‑131/12 - Google Spain (section Responsibility of the operator of a search engine under Directive 95/46)Directive 95/46 … be applied, in the light of Article 8 of the [Charter], in the Member State where the centre of gravity of the conflict is located and more16 KB (2,423 words) - 13:03, 1 June 2023
- and the data protection officer; (b) the purposes of the processing; (c) a description of the categories of data subjects and of the categories of personal31 KB (3,327 words) - 15:31, 5 June 2023
- 2020 the Sanctions Board of the Office imposed fines for the first time. The Board has imposed a total of 21 fines, the total amount of which is €3,5035 KB (492 words) - 18:09, 19 March 2024
- informed of outcome of the investigation would compromise the objectives of GDPR. The CJEU added that a DPA assessing a complaint has a margin of discretion15 KB (2,180 words) - 08:23, 13 December 2023