Search results

adequacy decision pursuant to Article 45 GDPR shall be used, when it exists; second, appropriate safeguards under Article 46 GDPR, such as binding corporate

Category:Article 33 GDPR There was no equivalent to Article 33 GDPR under the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. Indeed, Article 17 of the Directive only

Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each

exercising of powers of SAs. It concerned the interpretation of Article 28 GDPR of Directive 95/46, the GDPR predecessor. It stays relevant with regard to concepts

consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63 GDPR (Article 28(8) GDPR). The Commission has made use of its power under Article 28(7) GDPR and published standard

that process them. This was already the case under Article 8(7) of the DPD, the precursor of Article 87 GDPR. In many Member States, the processing of NIN

decisions in Category:Article 34 GDPR As with that provision, there was no equivalent to Article 34 GDPR in the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. Additionally

to in Article 46(2)(d) GDPR, contractual clauses referred to in Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, or binding corporate rules within the meaning of Article 47 GDPR

to in point (d) of Article 46(2) and in Article 28(8); (e) aims to authorise contractual clauses referred to in point (a) of Article 46(3); or (f) aims to

to Article 42(7); (p) specify the requirements referred to in Article 43(3) with a view to the accreditation of certification bodies under Article 42;

with Article 13, Article 14 GDPR gives expression to the principle of transparency enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and further defined in Article 12 GDPR

compliance. Article 40 GDPR elaborates upon a pre-existing provision under the Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection Directive – DPD), specifically Article 27(1)

decisions in Category:Article 74 GDPR For more on this point, see Article 72 GDPR. Dix in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 74 GDPR, margin number

deliberations of the Board's predecessor, the Article 29 Working Party (“WP29”), were wholly privileged. Under Article 11(1) of WP29's Rules of Procedure, any

rules, do not fall within the scope of this article. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 48 GDPR Kuner, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey,

referred to in Article 64. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(2). Recital

remedies. CJEU: The CJEU has clarified in C-132/21 that "Article 77(1), Article 78(1) and Article 79(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 [...] must be interpreted

unlike delegated acts made under Article 92 GDPR. Article 93(2) GDPR explicitly provides for the application of Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011

protection principles (Article 5), determination of the legal basis for processing (Article 6), implementation of security measures (Article 32), notification

although a somewhat similar protection could already be found in Article 12(2) of Directive 95/46 (DPD). That provision gave data subjects the possibility to