Search results

for making 1,718 unsolicited direct marketing calls. In August 2020, the ICO noticed a number of complaints made to the Telephone Preference Service ('TPS')

direct marketing purposes. The ICO found that LTH contravened Regulation 21 of PECR, and issued a £170,000 fine. The ICO stated that the conditions for

Subject] as required for the case." The data subject complained to the ICO. The ICO held that First Choices unlawfully failed to comply with the data subject's

to, not having registered with the ICO’s public data protection register) as well as a lack of cooperation with the ICO regarding the investigation. Share

The ICO issued a decision on the necessity of a disclosure of information hold by a public entity to satisfy the legitimate public interests of accountability

finding by the ICO that it had failed to comply with a large number of subject access requests without undue delay. Then, in January 2019 the ICO "was made

The UK DPA (ICO) served an Enforcement Notice against the credit reference agency Experian, after it found that Experian violated the transparency principle

The UK DPA (ICO) found that the Neath Port Talbot Council correctly withheld information about the name of a person submitting a complaint about another

On April 14, 2020, the ICO supported the decision of the Insolvency Service to withold the information it held about insolvent companies. Furthermore,

The ICO rules that there is sufficient legitimate interest in disclosure of the information relating to the job description of the CCG officers commissioning

available online at the following link: https://ico.org.uk/media/about-the- ico/policiesandprocedures/1890/ico enforcement communications policy.pdf Please

has adequate staff resources in place to process and respond to SARs. The ICO notes that the Council has taken steps to ensure it has adequate staffing

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) reprimanded Nottinghamshire County Council for infringing Article 32(1) (UK) GDPR. The failure to implement

company had not collected as scheduled. The ICO has issued a formal reprimand to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). The ICO investigation uncovered a lack of robust

While these are welcome remedial steps that have been taken by TVP, the ICO would expect more to be done in an incident such as this. For example, the

The ICO issued a penalty of £36,000 against Unite the Union for unsolicited direct marketing calls (in violation of Regulation 21 PECR) to 57,665 individuals

Commissioner's Office; ICO) received nearly 200 complaints over unsolicited electronic direct marketing text messages. The ICO started a preliminary investigation

original. Please refer to the English original for more details. https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/mpns/4021951/interserve-group-limited-monetary-penalty-notice

20 SARs which are up to one year old that have not been completed yet. The ICO considers that the council has failed to provide access to personal data and

Consequently, the ICO concluded that Energy Suite had been negligent and the "condition (b) from section 55A (1) DPA is met". The ICO considered the aggravating