Search results

that Wind Tre had violated the following articles of the GDPR: Articles 5(1), 5(2), 6(1)(a), 7, 12(1), 12(2), 24 and 25. It subsequently fined Wind Tre 16

processing by the defendant can only be Article 6 (1) sentence 1 lit e) DSGVO (see b) or Article 6 (1) sentence 1 lit f) DSGVO (see c), the requirements

laws (like § 151 GewO) and GDPR? Is a prediction of a political affiliation a "special category of data" under Article 9(1) GDPR? The decision of the DSB

Ordinance Article 5, paragraph Article 5 (2) 1, letter c and letter f., Article 5, paragraph Article 6 (1) (a) Article 32 (1), (1), (33) 1 and 35, para. 1. Below

rely on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR in the context of its offering of the Facebook Terms of Service, and to include an infringement of Article 6(1) GDPR” (Para

violates §§ 307 para. 1, para. 2 no.1 in connection with Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 1 DSGVO. Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 1 DSGVO and against § 1 UKlaG in conjunction

as a 'legitimate interest' pursued by Meta pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Lastly, the CJEU noted that the fact that Article 6(1)(a) and Article 9(2)(a)

decryption, a defendant's smartcard and corresponding software are required as well as a receiver such as a receiver or a CI-Plus module together with a compatible

contract in accordance with Article 6(1)(b) GDPR. Additionally, the controller presented arguments regarding the possibility of applying a legitimate interest

with the provisions of Article 6(1)(c), Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, or both provisions? 2.     Does the answer to Question 1 mean: a)      that the person whose

compliance with the principles of Article 5 GDPR and that they could be based on the legal basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The BVwG ruled that the principle

legitimate interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, they must still comply with data protection principles under Article 5 GDPR. In Croatia, many employers

Bobek is also of the opinion that Article 6(1)(c) GDPR and Article 6(3) GDPR do not preclude national rules from laying down, without any limit in time

breached Article 6(1)(f) GDPR for lack of legal basis, Article 21 for lack of considering an objection, Article 13 for lack of information and Article 24 for

DPC decisions, Meta shifted its legal basis from Article 6(1)(b) GDPR (contract) to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (legitimate interest) for most of its processing

consent, in line with Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. The Court recalled that Article 31 of the Croatian Law on the Implementation of the GDPR stipulates that the

9(1) GDPR. The preliminary questions concern the issue whether the existence of a legal obligation – Article 6(1)(c) GDPR – or a public interest – Article

breaching Article 6(1) GDPR, and required the company to implement a policy for conducting credit ratings per Article 24 GDPR. A person lodged a complaint

controllers to have breached Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, Article 9(1) GDPR, as well as Article 12 and 13 GDPR for having unlawfully contacted a data subject after the

unsolicited direct marketing messages received by subscribers. In the ICO's view, is a clear attempt to capitalise on, and profiteer from, the national health crisis