Search results

are incompatible with Art 2 (1) in conjunction with Art 1 (1) and Art 10 (1) of the German constitution (Basic Law – Grundgesetz – GG) for lack of consideration

the Basic Law (GG), from Article 103(2) GG, from the general freedom of action in Article 2(1) GG and from human dignity in Article 1(1) GG. Without a link

general right of personality, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 GG, or from Section 823 Paragraph 2 BGB in connection

2020, 11 LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January

DSGVO Art. 4 No. 1, No. 2, Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 1 lit. c, para. 3 sentence 1, Art. 86 GKG § 47 (1), § 52 (2), § 53 (2) no. 2, § 63 (3) sentence 1 no.

August 2019 (Annex K 1), which did not merely contain a non-binding assessment of the defendant. Finally, the applications No. 1 a dd to gg were inadmissible

the parties to the 08.1.2020 plenary sitting and subsequently a deadline for the submission of statements. At the hearing held in 08.1.2020, the Director

Art. 13 Para. 4, Art. 14 Para. 5 a, Art. 15, Art. 23 para. 1 e and i FGO § 32a Paragraph 1 No. 1, Paragraph 2, § 32c Paragraph 1 No. 1§ 33, § 90 a, § 115

customers from Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG.42 III. The decision on costs is a mixed cost decision (Section 155 (1) Sentence 1 VwGO) on

third-party action (1.). On the complainant's side, his general right of personality (Article 2.1 in conjunction with Article 1.1 of the Basic Law) in

connection with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO

constitutional complaint is therefore obviously well-founded, § 93c.1 sentence 1 BVerfGG. 1. The Local Court violated the complainant's right to the lawful

protection of private life and his data (Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 of the Basic Law, Art. 8 para. 1 ECHR, Art. 7 f. GrCh) and the right of the defendants

in conjunction with Article 34 of the German Constitution (GG). Art. 34 GG. The claim under Art. 82 GDPR is advantageous for the data subject because of

over whether he implements them. 13th 9 10gl. on § 9 BDSG and Art. 2 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with 1 Paragraph 1 GG: Lotz / Wendler, CR 2016, 31, 34. Martini

§1004 para. 1 sentence 1 BGB analogous i. V. m. § 823 para. 1 BGB i. V. m. the general right of personality from Art. 2 Para. 1, Art. Para. 1 GG. 51a) With

according to: Ad. I.:Ad. Roman one: Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a and c as well as Art. 6 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 83 Para. 1 and 5 lit. Paragraph one, letter

2 GDPR Art EWG_GDPR Article 6 GDPR Art EWG_DSGVO Article 88 GG Art GG Article 1 GG Art GG Article 2 Paragraph GG Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG Art GG Article

(application 1 a) from § 1004 para. 1 sentence 2, § 823 para. 1 BGB, Art. 1 para 1, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG and § 12 sentence 2 BGB negative. 74 1. The Court

self-determination from Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with 1 sec. 1 GG; however, this interference is constitutionally justified. (1) The publication of the

EU-GRC Art. 8 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1 TFEU Article 16 GG Art. 2 Para. 1 and Art. 1 Para. 1 BGB § 1004 paragraph 1 sentence 2 analogous GDPR Art. 2 Para

self-determination (Art. 2 Para. 1 in connection with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG), possibly even interference with the inviolability of the home (Art. 13 Para. 1 GG). The right

chains: GDPR Art. 2, Art. 12, Art. 21, Art. 77 para. 1, Art. 78 para. 1 Bavarian Data Protection Act (Bayerisches Datenschutzgestz – BayDSG) Art. 2, 20, 24

chains: GDPR Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a and lit. f, Art. 6 Para. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 17, Art. 25 Para BGB § 823 paragraph 2, § 1004 paragraph 1 sentence 2

standards: GG Art. 1 Para. 1 GG Art. 2 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1 GG Art. 3 Para. 1 GG Art. 13 Para. 7 GDPR Art. 4 GDPR Art. 5 Para. 1 GDPR Art. 6 Para. 1, Para

VIG § 2 (1) p. 1 no. 1, § 5 (4) p. 1, § 6 (1) p. 1, p. 3, (3) p. 2, (4) p. 2 LFGB § 40 (1a) VwGO § 80a (3), § 146 (4) p. 3, § 152 (1GG) Art. 5 (1) GPDR Art

self-determination from Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 1(1) GG, the negative freedom of belief from Article 4(1) GG and the duty of the state comment

informational self-determination according to Article 1 (1) in conjunction with Article 2 (1) GG. The defendant was not able to eliminate the risk of repetition

pursuant to Section 823 (1) or Section 839 BGB in conjunction with Art. 34 GG in conjunction with Art. 1 (1), Art . 2 para. 1 GG denied, since there was

self-determination under Article 1(1) in conjunction with Article 2(1) of the German Constitution (Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland - GG). The court also

free development of personality according to Art. 2 Para. 1 GG and human dignity according to Art. 1 Para. 1 GG of the indicators of assemblies, which guarantee

Defendant; 2.10 has interfered with the plaintiff's fundamental right of informational self-determination (Art. 1 GG in conjunction with Art. 2 GG, Art. 8 GRCh

to the general principle of equality (Art. 3 (1) GG) and the rule of law (Art. 20 (3), Art. 28 (1) sentence 1 GG) (judgment of the Federal Constitutional

type: Judgment Source: Hesse Standards: § 823 BGB, § 1004 BGB, art. 1 GG, art. 2 GG, art. 12 GG ... more Document tab Short textLong text No "free shot" for

56). The defendant has the authorization in Art. 24 Para. 4 Sentence 1 GO (cf. Art. 26 Para. 1 Sentence 1 KommZG) by issuing the amendment to the water

Data Protection Act (BDSG) or from § 823.1, § 1004 of the Civil Code in conjunction with Article 1.1, Article 2.1 of the Basic Law. 8 a) The complainant's

rights (Article 2 (1) in conjunction with Article 1 (1) GG) of the applicant and violates Article 9 (1) GDPR. Voluntary consent (Art. 9 Para. 2 Letter a

self-determination (from Article 2.1 of the Basic Law in conjunction with Article 2.1 of the Basic Law). Art. 1 para. 1 GG, cf. OVG BBbg, decision of 27 May

of the more restrictive par. to § 823 para. 1 BGB in conjunction with Art. 1 para. 1, Art. 2 para. 1 GG) . ee) To compensate for this non-material damage

ECLI:DE:OLGCE:2022:0120.13U84.19.00 § 242 BGB, § 249 Abs 1 BGB, § 280 Abs 1 S 1 BGB, Art 16 EUV 2016/679, Art 82 Abs 2 S 1 EUV 2016/679, § 256 ZPO PROCEDURE Proceeding

sentences 2 to 4, use under paragraph 1 sentence 1 number 1 alternative 1 and the stay in accordance with paragraph 1 sentence 1 points 2 to 7 are prohibited.

longer covered by § 1 Para. 1 Sentence 1 IFG (cf. BVerwG, judgment of November 27, 2014 - BVerwG 7 C 20/12 - BVerwGE 151, 1 para. 37). 1. Insofar as the information

meaning of Art. 23 para. 1 no. 1 KUG requires a weighing of the rights of the person depicted under Art. 1 para. 1, 2 para. 1 GG, 8 para. 1 ECHR on the

) has been opened. 10 2. The applicability of Art. 17 DS-GVO does not conflict with Art. 38 Para. 1 BayDSG in conjunction with Art. 85 Para. 2 DS-GVO (so-called

chains: GO Art. 24 Paragraph 4 GG Art. 1 Paragraph 1; Article 2 paragraph 1 GDPR Art. 6 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 Letter e; Article 18 paragraph 1 letter d;

bases - Art. 3 (1) sentences 1, 3 and 5 ZwEWG, Section 12 (1) sentence 1 half 1, sentence 2 and sentence 4 ZeS - have the following wording:3Art. 3 (1) ZwEWG4

Sections 823 (1), 249, 253 BGB, Art 1 and 2 GG, a those of Art. 82 GG not required (cf. (BeckOK DatenschutzR/Quaas, 38th Ed. 1.11.2021, DS-GVO Art.82 Rn. 32;

right to informational self-determination (Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 1 Para. 1 Basic Law - GG - ). This legal institution conveys the authority

meaning of Art. 23 para. 1 no. 1 KUG requires a weighing of the rights of the person depicted under Art. 1 para. 1, 2 para. 1 GG, 8 para. 1 ECHR on the

Art. 13 Para. 4, Art. 14 Para. 5 a, Art. 15, Art. 23 para. 1 e and i FGO § 32a Paragraph 1 No. 1, Paragraph 2, § 32c Paragraph 1 No. 1§ 33, § 90 a, § 115

of the right to informational self-determination under Art. 2 (1) in conjunction with Art. 1 (1) GG . 60 This guarantees the authority of the individual

entitled to extended information in accordance with Art. 15 (1) half-sentence 2 GDPR. According to Art. 4 No. 2 GDPR, processing also includes in particular

Section 823 Paragraph 1 of the German Civil Code (BGB) in conjunction with. Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG owes monetary compensation

right to information (1) Restrictions of the GDPR and the AO 72 According to Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR, the person concerned (Art. 4 No. 1 GDPR) has a right to

action according to Art. 2 Para. 1 GG and its right to the established and exercised commercial enterprise according to Art. 14 Para. 1 GG. The storage period

conditions of Art. 6 Para. 1 DS-GVO is fulfilled. (1) The disputed data processing by the plaintiff was lawful according to Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 Letter f

right to informational self-determination from Art. 1 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 2 Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, these interests (see (c)).

taking into account the provisions of Art. 7 and Art. 8 GRCh or Art. 2 para. 1 in conjunction with 1 Para. 1 GG, there is scope and relevance for the preliminary

the provisions of Articles 1 (3) and 15 (1) of the said Directive No. 2002/58 , which provide for the following: Article 1 3 - This Directive does not

paragraph 1 and Article 1 paragraph 1 GG (general right of personality) or from § 823 paragraph 2 BGB i. In conjunction with Art. 2 (1) and Art. 1 (1) GG (right

Regulation Art. 3 para. 1 BGB § 307 para. 1, para. 2, para. 3 TMG § 3 para. 2 p. 1, § 13 As. 4 p. 1 GDPR Art. 99 para. 2 Guiding principles: (1) The operator

claim under Article 82 (1) GDPR, which he could also base on Article 823 (1) BGB in conjunction with Article 2 (1) and Article 1 (1) GG. The defendant had seriously

autonomy protected in Art. 2 para. 1 of the German Constitution (GG) that, for participation in the blocking system pursuant to § 6 para. 1 sentence 2 Hess.

pursuant to § 1.5 sentence 1 BDSG in conjunction with Art. 4.1 lit. A of Directive 95/46/EC, because in a Directive-compliant interpretation of § 1.5 sentence

chains: BayPrG Art. 4 para. 1 VwGO § 123 (1) sentence 2, § 146, § 152, § 154 (2) ZPO § 920 Basic Law Article 5(1) GKG § 47, § 52 (2), § 53 (2) No. 1 Keywords:

standard B-VG Art 130 Paragraph 2a B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 B-VG Art87 Paragraph 2 BVwGG §24a BVwGG §3 GDPR Art55 Paragraph 3 GOG §84 GOG §85 B-VG Art. 130 today

pursuant to Sections 1, 3 (1) No. 1 UKlaG i. V. m. § 307 paragraph 1, 2 no. 2 BGB i. In conjunction with Art. 5 Para. 1 lit a) and Art. 6 Para. 1 GDPR therefore

privacy guaranteed by Article 2 sentence 1 in conjunction with Article 2 sentence 1 of the Basic Law. Art. 1 sentence 1 of the Basic Constitutional Law. b.

Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter a Var. 1, Art. 6 paragraph 1 subpara. 1 lit. a, Art. 7, Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 4 No. 1 GDPR. 83The defendant

the applicant to 2), in accordance with sections 1626 (1), 1629 (1) sentence 1 and sentence 2 ms. 1 BGB as its legal representative. 13 To the extent permitted

authority according to Art. 77, 57 Para. 1 lit. 22 cf. on the dispute: Administrative Court (VGH) Baden-Württemberg, judgment of 1 S 3001/19, juris Rn. 51

monetary compensation under Article 2.1 in conjunction with Article 1 of the Basic Law nor to non-material damages. Article 1 of the Basic Law, nor to non-material

by the intervention in Article 2 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law - GG. The lawsuit was also received in good time

511 ; Gola/Pitz in Gola, GDPR Art. 82 Rn. 13 mwN the more restrictive case on § 823 1 BGB in conjunction with Art. 1 I, 2 1 GG). 76 Contrary to the defendant's

information from Art. 15 GDPR on the basis of Art. 23 (1) GDPR. § 32c paragraph 1 no. 2 AO refers to the opening clause of Art. 23 paragraph 1 letter j GDPR

claim - contrary to the plaintiff's view - does not follow from Art. 82 (1) GDPR. Art. 82 (1) GDPR would probably be directly applicable in national law.

not entitled to damages against the plaintiff pursuant to Art. 81(1) GDPR (correctly: Art. 82(1) GDPR). The plaintiff had indeed violated an obligation under

contributions is obvious (§ 10 sentence 1 no. 2 TMG ; Section 4 (1) no. 2 in conjunction with Section 3 (1) sentence 1, (2) sentence 1 nos. 2 and 3 NetzDG; BGHZ

defendant. This claim is based on Art. 82 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1, Para. 3 GDPR. According to Art. 82 (1) GDPR, any person who has suffered material or

relevant court act and are undisputed. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To I to A) 3.1.1. Legal situation: Art. 12 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

concerns of freedom of expression from Art. 5 Para. 1 Sentence 1 GG (BVerfG, decision of December 19, 2021 - 1 BvR 1073 /20 -, juris para. 26 with further

public area, it must be ensured that 1. the minimum distance of 1.5 metres required in accordance with Article 1 paragraph 1 sentence 2 can be maintained by

Section 50 (1) BMG, Section 49 BWahlG, Section 6 (1) S 1e EUV 2016/679, Section 17 HKG ND, Section 85a HKG ND, Section 85a (1) S 1 HKG ND, Section 5 (1) S 2 DSG

Therefore, according to Art. 15 Para. 3 Sentence 1 i. V. Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR no right to release the test questions.2. The right to have the test questions provided

Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. On 1 January 2024, the investigator for the Catalan DPA proposed a fine of € 3000 for the controller’s infringement of Article 5(1)(f)

17 (1) and (3) KSchG, as well as Article 1 (1) (a) subparagraph i of Directive 98/59 EC, the implementation of which is aimed at § 17 paragraph 1 sentence

interested parties (see art. 4, paragraph 1, no. 4 articles 13, paragraph 1, letter f); 14, par. 2, lit. g), 15, para. 1, lit. h) art. 21, par. 1 and 35, paragraph

III of the GDPR, cf. Art. 12 (1) sentence 2, (3) sentence 1, Art. 15 (1) to (3) GDPR (cf. Nguyen in: Gola, DS-GVO, 2nd ed. 2018, Art. 58 para. 18). In the

violates Art. 16 Sentence 1 GDPR, Section 2 Para. 1 BMG and Art. 3 Para. 1 GG. He, the plaintiff, is entitled to a right to correction under Art. 16 Sentence

parties within the meaning of Art. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR (see also Schantz in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Art. 6(1) Rz 133 f, 137). Thus, it

standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 DSG §4 GDPR Art 12 GDPR Art 15 GDPR Art 15 Paragraph 1 litc GDPR Art77 UWG §26b paragraph 1 B-VG Art. 133 today

'party affinities': 3.2.1 On the relevant legal provisions: Art 4 DSGVO, entitled "Definitions", reads as follows in no. 1 "1) "personal data" shall mean

under US law - 16 - be without a doubt not with Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. f GDPR, Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a GDPR and Art compatible. I.16. After being asked to comment

Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 BGB, would contradict Section 307 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1, Paragraph 2 No. 1 BGB in conjunction with Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter a)

seront communiquées [... ] "). In contrast to Art 15 GDPR, Art 13 Paragraph 1 lit e and Art 14 Paragraph 1 lit e GDPR does not state the data subject's

dismissed as unfounded. Legal bases: Art. 3, Art. 4, Art. 5, Art. 17, Art. 51 Para. 1, Art. 57 Para. 1 lit. f and Art. 77 Para. 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (

Paragraph 24(1) and (1) and (2) of the B-VG. 5 DSG as amended, with the provisos that part 1. of the ruling concerning the data protection complaint of 1 February

Section 1 (1) DSG can therefore not be assumed (RS0130870). 3.2.1. On the legality of the publication of the BF's data in the app Art 6 para 1 GDPR contains

HmbKrebsRG Article 9 (1) GDPR, Article 6 (1) GDPR, Article 5 (1) in conjunction with Articles 12, 13 and/or Article 14 GDPR and/or Article 5 (1) (in particular

Administrative Court considered: 1. Findings: 1.1. On the one hand, the decision is based on the facts presented under point I. 1.2. In addition, it is found: