Search results
From GDPRhub
- VG Hamburg - 17 K 3920/19 (category VG Hamburg (Germany))accordance with the Hamburg Transparency Act (§ 3 (1) No. 15 HmbTG). The plaintiff is employed by the University Medical Center in Hamburg, a corporation under37 KB (5,831 words) - 15:07, 22 March 2022
- VG Hamburg - 21 K 1802/21 (category VG Hamburg (Germany))VG Hamburg held that the processing of health data in a Cancer Registry was unlawful. Although the processing's nature fit the exceptions of Article 9(2)(h)-(j)115 KB (18,479 words) - 16:31, 25 January 2023
- OVG Hamburg - 3 Bs 146/23 (category OVG Hamburg (Germany))with the Administrative Court of Hamburg (Verwaltungsgericht Hamburg, VG Hamburg) The controller is the University of Hamburg, a legal entity under public26 KB (4,083 words) - 14:05, 24 January 2024
- 5 Bf 279/17, juris Rn 63 ff; VG Schwerin, judgment of March 16, 2021 - 1 A 1254/20 SN Rn 65 ff; Administrative Court - VG Ansbach, judgment of March 1634 KB (5,655 words) - 14:08, 16 May 2023
- VG Berlin - 3 L 664/21 A (category VG Berlin (Germany))(cf. VG Berlin, order of November20.2019 - VG L33 A467.19 -, legal marginal no. with14 further references; VG Berlin, order of July 20.2020 - VG 23 L 272/2010 KB (1,395 words) - 17:00, 2 February 2022
- OVG Hamburg - 5 Bs 152/20 (category OVG Hamburg (Germany))Procedure first VG Hamburg 17th Chamber, July 30, 2020, Az: 17 E 2756/20, decision tenor The respondent's complaint against the decision of the Hamburg Administrative45 KB (7,219 words) - 13:48, 24 January 2022
- self-governing bodies is indeed obvious (see VG Hamburg, decision of 3 December 2019 - 5 E 5549/19 -, juris nr. 6; VG Würzburg, decision of 6 May 2004 - W 627 KB (4,222 words) - 15:16, 17 March 2022
- VG München - M 32 K 20.2879 (category VG München (Germany))Karg op. Uv February 12, 2015 - OVG 12 B 13/12 - NVwZ-RR 2015, 801, 802); VG Hamburg, U.v. February 25, 2004 - 7 K 1422/03 - juris Rn. 57; Reidt / Schiller34 KB (5,661 words) - 13:40, 20 September 2021
- VG Gelsenkirchen - 20 K 6392/18 (category VG Gelsenkirchen (Germany))February 25, 1969 - IC 65.67 -, juris Rn. 40; see also VG Hamburg, judgment of February 16, 1999 - 10 VG 1745/98 -, juris Rn. 29. Insofar as the plaintiff requests98 KB (16,595 words) - 15:50, 17 March 2022
- HmbBfDI (Hamburg) - Vermerk: Abdingbarkeit von TOMs (category HmbBfDI (Hamburg))171 cited from VG Mainz judgment. December 17, 2020 - 1 K 778 / 19.MZ, BeckRS 2020, 41220, para. 42, which leaves the question open; VG Berlin ruling v30 KB (4,562 words) - 15:27, 6 December 2023
- VGH München – 5 CS 19.2087 (redirect from VG München – 5 CS 19.2087)München waived this lawsuit. Subsequently the complainant appealed with the VG München, requesting to prohibit the respondent from publishing the information40 KB (6,397 words) - 08:03, 21 March 2022
- VG Gießen - 4 K 252/19.GI (category VG Gießen (Germany))examination of the asserted claim is the focus of the administrative action. (OVG Hamburg, judgement of 08.02.2018,3 Bf 107/17). The subsequent decision - also with35 KB (5,815 words) - 15:51, 17 March 2022
- VG Düsseldorf - 29 K 7031/19 (category VG Düsseldorf (Germany))10 A 10613/20 -, juris Rn. 31 ff .; VG Ansbach, judgment of August 8, 2019 - AN 14. K 19.00272 -, juris Rn 42 ff .; VG Wiesbaden, judgment of June 7, 202127 KB (4,391 words) - 13:32, 20 November 2021
- https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=LG_M%C3%BCnchen_-_3_O_17493/20). The VG Regensburg (RN 9 K 19.1061 - VG Regensburg - RN 9 K 19.1061) takes another stance. It decided31 KB (5,060 words) - 07:47, 16 March 2022
- recourse (cf. Bay. VGH, decision of May 5, 2014 - 4 C 14.449 -, para. 17; OVG Hamburg, Resolution of August 14, 2000 - 3 So 54/00 -, paragraph 6; each juris)10 KB (1,302 words) - 16:28, 24 January 2023
- VG Berlin - 1 K 391/20 (category VG Berlin (Germany))adjudicating court (cf. VG Berlin, judgments of April 20, 2021 - VG 16 K 3/21, n.v.; of December 12, 2019 - VG 27 K 292.15; March 22, 2012 - VG 20 K 123.10) it36 KB (5,768 words) - 14:17, 18 May 2022
- VG Schwerin - 1 A 1254/20 SN (category VG Schwerin (Germany))no. 7; in this direction: OVG Hamburg, judgment of 7 October 2019 - 5 Bf 279/17, BeckRS 2019, 36126 marginal no. 63; VG Mainz, judgment of 16 January 202037 KB (6,156 words) - 10:12, 26 May 2021
- VG Schwerin - 1 A 1343/19 SN (category VG Schwerin (Germany))plaintiff under Article 15(3) GDPR. The Administrative Court of Schwerin (VG Schwerin) first finds that the expert opinion is personal data under Article61 KB (10,071 words) - 14:28, 14 July 2021
- VG Karlsruhe - 7 K 2578/22 (category VG Karlsruhe (Germany))with the Administrative Court of Karlsruhe (Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe - VG Karlsruhe). The office replied that they believed that such a request might83 KB (13,935 words) - 10:24, 17 January 2024
- platform, provision of information, Consumer Information Act lower court: VG Regensburg, decision of 04.05.2020 - RO 5 S 20.541 Place of discovery: BeckRS29 KB (4,594 words) - 12:48, 15 September 2021
- terms of use of the defendant that German law shall apply (see also LG Hamburg, Urt. v. 31.05.2019 - 305 O 117/18, BeckRS 2019, 21755 marginal no. 18)66 KB (10,899 words) - 08:33, 8 September 2021
- inspection and transmission of an extract from a tax account, see. OVG Hamburg, Judgment of 8 February 2018 - 3 Bf 107/17 -, juris, marginal no. 22. 51123 KB (20,784 words) - 10:11, 26 November 2021