Search results
From GDPRhub
- AEPD (Spain) (section Decision Database)reposicion" to ask the AEPD to reconsider its decision or 2) an appeal directly with the Superior Administrative Court. Recurso: You have one month to file. The4 KB (386 words) - 15:29, 3 September 2021
- Article 52 GDPR (section Decisions)to ensure the complete independence of their SAs. In Commission v Germany the Court specified that the notion of “complete independence” must be given47 KB (5,594 words) - 22:45, 1 April 2024
- appeal against these decisions are possible at the federal administrative court. (→ Judiciary of Germany in WIkipedia, Law of Germany § Public law in Wikipedia4 KB (372 words) - 10:45, 22 September 2021
- Article 69 GDPR (section Decisions)by the Court in Commission v Germany, which interpreted the phrase “complete independence” in the context of Directive 95/46/EC. Here, the Court emphasised18 KB (1,327 words) - 12:36, 14 December 2023
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) (section Decision Database)fine is brought to the police who present the case in court. As such, appeals will go through the court system. Datatilsynet post the focus of their planned6 KB (605 words) - 14:08, 27 April 2021
- own motion. Appeals against decisions by the Italian Garante can be taken by the parties concerned before the civil court (Article 152 of the Code, which7 KB (808 words) - 08:17, 16 February 2023
- APD/GBA (Belgium) (section Decision Database)section! The Court of Appeal of Brussels is competent for the appeals against the decision of the litigation chamber. All other decisions can be appealed9 KB (993 words) - 07:10, 28 July 2022
- Article 85 GDPR (section Decisions)legislation. Mrs Lindqvist appealed that decision, and in the context of these proceedings, the national court referred several questions to the CJEU. One33 KB (3,748 words) - 14:25, 7 November 2023
- CNIL (France) (section Decision Database)highest administrative court (Conseil d'État). This applies to sanctions, guidelines or any decision of the authority. Decisions by the Conseil d'État are8 KB (824 words) - 22:52, 27 February 2024
- Datatilsynet (Norway) (section Court)change parts of or their whole decision. The DPA will then send the recipient the final decision, who may now appeal the decision if they still object to the10 KB (1,078 words) - 06:40, 26 March 2023
- Article 88 GDPR (section Decisions)data protection impact assessment where employees are subject to automated decision-making, surveillance and monitoring activities. More targeted rules are32 KB (3,228 words) - 13:32, 30 November 2023
- DSB (Austria) (section Decision Database)seems to be no formal decision that can be appealed. Any party can file an appeal against any DSB decision (or in the case of non-decision within 6 months)11 KB (1,468 words) - 13:27, 14 May 2023
- IP (Slovenia) (section Decision Database)who prepared the opinion. Decisions in inspection procedures include information on the staff member, who issued the decision on the Information Commissioner’s10 KB (1,242 words) - 10:51, 6 February 2024
- legally binding decision may appeal against the decision with in 28 days. Further appeals on a point of law to the Hight Court or Appeals Court are possible8 KB (1,034 words) - 14:13, 20 August 2021
- NAIH (Hungary) (section Decision Database)the NAIH decision shall be submitted to the authority itself within thirty days of its communication. Only attorney at law can act at the court on behalf7 KB (821 words) - 14:16, 7 March 2024
- will have to go before a court to claim compensation. Typically, this claim will first take place before the Small Claims Court. The EWCA in Open Rights18 KB (2,488 words) - 15:22, 14 December 2021
- Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG]) is possible. The Federal Constitutional Court ruled in 1986 (As-long-as-2-decision) As long as the18 KB (1,831 words) - 13:49, 3 November 2022
- HDPA (Greece) (section Decision Database)Any third party that is affected by the Court decision and did not intervene in the proceedings nor was the decision lawfully notified to him prior to the23 KB (2,039 words) - 08:15, 25 April 2024
- set out in paragraph 2. 6. Court proceedings for exercising the right to receive compensation shall be brought before the courts competent under the law of33 KB (4,215 words) - 09:57, 19 March 2024
- DVI (Latvia) (section Decision Database)submission to the Director of the DVI. Furthermore, the decision issued by Director may be appealed to a court in accordance with the Law on Administrative Liability6 KB (544 words) - 04:39, 11 October 2022
- instance court against a decision taken by the EDPS. Should the decision be appealed by the data subject, this will then go to the Court of Justice (CJEU)8 KB (1,078 words) - 12:58, 10 May 2024
- Article 9 GDPR (section Decisions)exercise or defence of legal claims, whether in court proceedings or in an administrative or out-of-court procedure. Recital 53: Processing Special Category44 KB (5,905 words) - 14:00, 24 October 2023
- UOOU (Czech Republic) (section Decision Database)overturn or amend the contested decision. It is then not possible to appeal the decision by the Head of the DPA. This decision can then only be challenged5 KB (441 words) - 09:34, 17 September 2022
- “pending in a court in another Member State”) any competent court other than the court first seized may suspend its proceedings. The courts are under no27 KB (2,619 words) - 14:52, 16 November 2023
- CNPD (Luxembourg) (section Decision Database)tribunal for review. A tribunal decision may also be challenged and the case will then move forward in the Luxembourg court system. Complaints can be filed10 KB (1,199 words) - 10:14, 19 October 2022
- where a decision of a supervisory authority implementing a decision of the Board is challenged before a national court and the validity of the decision of the30 KB (3,874 words) - 10:46, 7 December 2023
- term ‘personal data’ as broad as possible. In this regard, the German Constitutional Court already in 1983 stated that "Under the conditions of automatic125 KB (16,328 words) - 16:01, 8 March 2024
- UOOU (Slovakia) (section Decision Database)is manifestly unfounded b) the subject of the complaint is reviewed by a court or law enforcement authority c) the complainant has not provided necessary9 KB (1,006 words) - 07:13, 7 July 2021
- Article 86 GDPR (section Decisions)General Court held that transparency overrode data protection. However, on appeal, the CJEU ruled the other way and stated that the original decision to withhold22 KB (2,177 words) - 10:01, 19 March 2024
- Article 15 GDPR. In a similar sense, the Regional Labour Court of the Land Baden-Württemberg in Germany has stated that the right to access includes information73 KB (9,896 words) - 15:46, 18 March 2024
- concerned in the decision-making process. Where the decision is to reject the complaint by the data subject in whole or in part, that decision should be adopted55 KB (7,446 words) - 22:28, 1 April 2024
- appealed to the Court of Appeal. The court granted the injunction but only in part. The court ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to refrain from storing9 KB (1,113 words) - 13:10, 1 June 2023
- sufficient. The Court emphasized that inaction is insufficient to establish whether the consent is a “freely given and informed decision”. The Court concludes6 KB (893 words) - 15:22, 24 March 2022
- BlnBDI (Berlin) - C-807/21 - Deutsche Wohnen (category Germany) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)and 102 TFEU, would require Germany to allow that GDPR fines may be initiated directly against an undertaking, despite Germany's administrative law requiring7 KB (936 words) - 16:39, 12 December 2023
- Article 3 GDPR (section Decisions)and makes profits with advertisement in the game. It is very popular in Germany among the large Turkish diaspora. The GDPR applies to the processing of37 KB (4,635 words) - 13:29, 24 October 2023
- OLG Schleswig - 17 U 15/21 (category OLG Schleswig (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)subject appealed against this decision to the Schleswig-Holstein Higher Regional Court (OLG Schleswig-Holstein). The court ruled that the data subject was51 KB (8,215 words) - 09:55, 13 May 2022
- LG Köln - 33 O 376/22 (category LG Köln (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 33 O 376/22 District Court of66 KB (9,990 words) - 12:30, 29 January 2024
- VK Baden-Württemberg - 1 VK 23/22 (category VK Baden-Württemberg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)not sufficient (OLG Karlsruhe, decision of 21.05.2021, 15 Verg 4/21, juris, marginal no. 28; OLG Brandenburg, decision of 29.05.2012, Verg W 5/12, juris62 KB (10,113 words) - 12:48, 17 August 2022
- companies brought an action against the decision before the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf, Germany (the Court). The Court referred to the CJEU for a preliminary8 KB (1,231 words) - 08:22, 6 July 2023
- Article 6 GDPR (section Decisions)accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court of Justice’) and the European Court of Human Rights. Recital 42: Proof108 KB (17,005 words) - 15:39, 18 March 2024
- underwent insolvency proceeding in Germany and were granted an early discharge from remaining debts by court decisions of 17 December 2020 and 23 March 202115 KB (2,180 words) - 08:23, 13 December 2023
- LG Magdeburg - 9 O 1571/20 (redirect from BfDI (Germany) - 9 O 1571/20) (category LG Magdeburg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)impression of the court. The court took the position that the plaintiff's filing abstractly constituted a professional threat52The court took the position27 KB (4,216 words) - 13:26, 8 January 2024
- OVG Sachsen-Anhalt - 1 M 49/23 (category OVG Sachsen-Anhalt (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)respected. The court of first instance rejected the claim. Therefore, the applicant appealed the decision before the Higher Administrative Court of Saxony-Anhalt14 KB (1,999 words) - 14:20, 18 July 2023
- LG Krefeld - 2 O 448/20 (category LG Krefeld (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)quantify the claim. The data subject then brought the action before court. The Court had to decide, inter alia, whether the data subject's request, if interpreted17 KB (2,758 words) - 14:10, 15 December 2021
- OLG Nürnberg - 8 U 2907/21 (category OLG Nürnberg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Lower court: LG Ansbach, judgment of July 13, 2021 - 3 O 1429/20 Ver Source: BeckRS 2022, 7415 tenor 1. The judgment of the Ansbach Regional Court of July24 KB (3,847 words) - 15:19, 11 September 2022
- LAG Hessen - 9 Sa 1431/19 (category LAG Hessen (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)right to information embodied therein. In conclusion, the court upheld the previous court's decision as the company failed to sufficiently substantiate their32 KB (5,093 words) - 16:07, 11 September 2022
- OLG Dresden - 4 U 1905/21 (category OLG Dresden (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Regional Court of Dresden (Oberlandesgericht Dresden - OLG Dresden). The Higher Regional Court of Dresden dismissed the plaintiffs appeal. The court found40 KB (6,325 words) - 16:12, 18 May 2022
- LG Köln - 28 O 138/22 (category LG Köln (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)claimed damages for €1,000 under Article 82 GDPR. The court rejected the data subject’s claim. The court referred to the CJEU judgement in case C-300/21, stressing39 KB (6,362 words) - 14:01, 22 June 2023
- LG Berlin - (526 OWi LG) 212 Js-OWi 1/20 (1/20), 526 OWiG LG 1/20 (category LG Berlin (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Deutsche Wohnen SE did not agree with the DPA's decision and brought the action before court. The Court held that the fine notice was not valid. The fine36 KB (5,810 words) - 13:09, 21 January 2022
- VGH Baden-Württemberg - 1 S 397/19 (category VGH Baden-Württemberg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the judgment of the Local Court Sarız. The Regional Court Kayseri had obviously not been aware of the decision of the Local Court and had assumed that the112 KB (19,310 words) - 08:08, 23 June 2022
- 15(1) and 15(3) GDPR. FT appealed this decision to the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice, Germany). The court stated that the solution to the dispute10 KB (1,478 words) - 11:17, 2 November 2023
- VG Wiesbaden - 6 K 788/20.WI (category VG Wiesbaden (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)subject appealed against this decision. The Administrative Court Wiesbaden suspended the proceedings and referred it to the Court of Justice of the European52 KB (8,534 words) - 12:58, 15 December 2021
- BVerfG - 1 BvR 16/13 (category BVerfG (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 13, 2012, overturned the judgment of the Higher Regional Court, amended the judgment of the Regional Court and133 KB (21,944 words) - 15:59, 22 March 2022
- CFR, it would have to be annulled by the Court of Justice of the European Union. To avoid annulments, the Court of Justice usually interprets and EU or48 KB (5,978 words) - 15:57, 1 February 2024
- OLG Köln - 15 U 126/19 (category OLG Köln (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the fact that the Federal Court of Justice in its decision of 20 February 2018 also referred to the decision of the European Court of Justice of 12 July 2011121 KB (20,412 words) - 15:58, 10 March 2022
- OLG Köln - 15 U 89/19 (category OLG Köln (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the fact that the Federal Court of Justice in its decision of 20 February 2018 also referred to the decision of the European Court of Justice of 12 July 2011143 KB (24,273 words) - 15:59, 10 March 2022
- this activity. The Regional Court upheld the request made by NRW but Fashion ID appealed the decision to the Higher Regional Court arguing that it wasn’t a6 KB (492 words) - 13:09, 1 June 2023
- How to add a new decision (section Authority or Court)case. The court that made the decision. If you have a court decision, there will generally be an auto-suggest based on the abbreviation of the court. Just17 KB (2,638 words) - 11:18, 19 February 2024
- Article 80 GDPR (section Decisions)for a legal remedy under Article 78(1) GDPR against a legally binding SA decision concerning the data subject. Thirdly, the NPO may file for a legal remedy26 KB (2,575 words) - 15:50, 9 November 2023
- LAG Hessen - 14 Sa 359/22 (category LAG Hessen (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The controller appealed the decision, arguing that there was no basis for the claim. The data subject appealed the decision, too. In the data subject's4 KB (415 words) - 12:43, 28 June 2023
- OLG Bremen - 1 W 18/21 (category OLG Bremen (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)respect, the decision differed from the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of 14 January 2021 (BVerfG - 1 BvR 2853/19). In that decision, the issue7 KB (945 words) - 13:54, 20 September 2021
- OVG Saarland - 2 A 111/22 (category OVG Saarland (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)with the Higher Saarland Administrative Court, requesting from the administrative Court to rescind the decision. The controller claimed that it had a legal4 KB (475 words) - 14:58, 13 June 2023
- The Regional Court dismissed the action. The plaintiff's appeal was unsuccessful. The VI. Zivilsenat of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice)6 KB (788 words) - 10:13, 10 September 2021
- OVG Saarlouis - 2 A 355/19 (category OVG Saarland (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)competition law (UWG). The plaintiff appealed the decision of the supervisory authority before the administrative court of Saarland (VG Saarlouis), arguing amongst7 KB (754 words) - 08:18, 29 December 2021
- VG Berlin - 1 K 90.19 (category VG Berlin (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)claims that the Court should 5. Quash the decision of rejection of the President of the Amtsgericht Tiergarten of 17 January 2019 and the decision of objection10 KB (1,324 words) - 13:46, 15 September 2021
- to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling, this will be followed-up. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below7 KB (972 words) - 14:15, 20 September 2021
- LAG Niedersachsen - 16 Sa 761/20 (category LAG Niedersachsen (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.7 KB (911 words) - 13:46, 16 December 2021
- LAG Baden-Württemberg - 17 Sa 37/20 (category LAG Baden-Württemberg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.4 KB (398 words) - 14:25, 17 September 2021
- LG Wiesbaden - 10 O 14/21 (category LG Wiesbaden (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)under civil law. The Regional Court Wiesbaden found the data subject's action both inadmissible and unfounded. First, the court stated that the data subject's8 KB (1,078 words) - 15:36, 14 February 2023
- AG Frankfurt am Main - 31 C 2043/22 (78) (category AG Frankfurt am Main (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)brought an action with the Amstgericht Frankfurt (local Court of Frankfurt). First, the Court did not follow the controller's argument concerning the non-personal5 KB (498 words) - 07:16, 7 June 2023
- BVerfG - 1 BvR 2853/19 (category BVerfG (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)which the court of last instance deliberately deviates in its decision from the case-law of the Court of Justice on questions relevant to the decision and nevertheless19 KB (3,209 words) - 13:08, 15 September 2021
- AG Pankow - 4 C 199/21 (category AG Pankow (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)District Court of Pankow (Amtsgericht Pankow - AG Pankow) requesting damages in the amount of €350 according to Article 82 GDPR. The District Court rejected17 KB (2,569 words) - 07:15, 17 May 2022
- OVG Lüneburg - 11 LA 104/19 (category OVG Lüneburg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)administrative court decision, that and why there should be doubts about the correctness of the opinion of the recognising administrative court. This requires25 KB (3,723 words) - 11:50, 10 September 2021
- OLG München - 3 U 2906/20 (category OLG München (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)each case. Also, up to the decision of March 26, 2020, through which the court determined the announcement date, no decision was made to separate the proceedings21 KB (3,450 words) - 10:33, 8 February 2022
- Article 70 GDPR (section Decisions)adopted its first binding decision under the Article 65 GDPR dispute resolution procedure on 9 November 2020 regarding a draft decision by the Irish Supervisory27 KB (3,038 words) - 12:19, 11 October 2023
- VG Potsdam - VG 3 K 1458/19 (category VG Potsdam (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the decision of the European Court of Justice cited above on the interpretation of Article 6(1)(e) of the SBC, the Court referred to the decision of December23 KB (3,560 words) - 14:17, 21 February 2024
- LG Gießen - 2 O 186/22 (category LG Gießen (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)restriction of processing under Article 18 GDPR ( cf. Cologne Higher Regional Court, decision of September 3, 2019 - 20 W 10/18). The plaintiff has none of the aforementioned16 KB (2,369 words) - 10:26, 7 December 2022
- LAG Baden-Württemberg - Sa 11/18 (category LAG Baden-Württemberg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The regional labour court of the Land Baden-Württemberg issued its decision on 20.12.2018, and present interesting developments regarding the right of18 KB (2,724 words) - 08:24, 14 March 2022
- OLG Koln - 15 U 45/23 (category OLG Köln (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)subject. The data subject appealed the latter part of the decision to the Higher Regional Court Cologne (“OLG Köln”). The data subject repeated and expanded26 KB (4,187 words) - 14:46, 8 May 2024
- LG Münster I - ECLI:DE:LGMS:2023:0704.16O238.22.00 (category LG Münster (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)subject filed a suit against the credit agency in the Regional Court of Münster. The Court held that the controller was in violation of Article 6(1) GDPR28 KB (4,215 words) - 15:09, 6 December 2023
- LAG Berlin-Brandenburg - 10 Sa 443/21 (category LAG Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)pointed out, he suffered damage. With reference to a decision of the Lower Saxony State Labor Court of October 22, 2021 - 16 Sa 761/20, there is an immaterial28 KB (4,527 words) - 15:58, 26 April 2022
- LG München - 31 O 16606/20 (category LG München (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)therein were taken into account by the court, but are ultimately not relevant for the decision. Reasons for decision 1 The action is admissible, with the25 KB (4,028 words) - 07:10, 8 February 2022
- LG Essen - 6 O 190/21 (category LG Essen (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Subsequently, a claim for payment of €30,000 was brought before the court. The Court dismissed the action as unfounded and held that the data subject is28 KB (4,596 words) - 18:30, 18 November 2021
- Labor Court judgment of June 27, 2018 - 10 Ca 234/18 - II. Saxon State Labor Court judgment of August 19, 2019 - 9 Sat 268/18 - Keyword for decision: Chairman40 KB (6,019 words) - 14:13, 28 November 2023
- now only be viewed if their first and last names, the insolvency court and the court file number are entered in the search field. This summary is based5 KB (605 words) - 10:14, 17 November 2023
- VGH München – 11 ZB 19.991 (category VGH München (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)this decision before the Regensburg Administrative Court, but the challenge was unsuccessful because the court was of the opinion that the decision did31 KB (5,184 words) - 17:19, 15 April 2023
- OLG Naumburg - 9 U 6/19 (category OLG Naumburg (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the German original for more details. DECISION Reasons A. 1. The32 KB (5,236 words) - 16:00, 10 March 2022
- OLG Frankfurt am Main - 13 U 206/20 (category OLG Frankfurt (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)damages. The court held that there is no need to apply §§ 823, 1004 BGB because the Federal Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH) in its decisions of 1244 KB (7,334 words) - 09:02, 17 March 2022
- OLG Köln - 20 U 295/21 (category OLG Köln (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Cologne Higher Regional Court, 20 U 295/21 Date: 05/13/2022 Court: Cologne Higher Regional Court Panel: 20th Civil Senate Decision Type: Judgment File number:42 KB (6,689 words) - 08:30, 21 November 2022
- VGH München – 5 CS 19.2087 (category VGH München (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)case-law of the Federal Administrative Court. As the Court of Appeal decided following the Bavarian Administrative Court of Justice (BayVGH, U.v. 16 February40 KB (6,397 words) - 08:03, 21 March 2022
- LG Bonn - 29 OWi 1/20 (category LG Bonn (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)GDPR. However, the Court reduced the fine imposed on the company from EUR 9,55 million to EUR 900,000. The Court upheld the DPA's decision that the company58 KB (9,577 words) - 08:06, 16 September 2021
- LAG Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania - 5 Sa 108/19 (category LAG Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The defendant then appealed to the administrative court to have the consent replaced in court. A decision has not yet been made. 17th In a letter dated 8/13/201848 KB (7,320 words) - 12:44, 4 October 2021
- party a decision for the purposes of Article 22(1) GDPR, where a third party draws strongly on that credit score to reach a decision? The Court held that6 KB (783 words) - 16:05, 12 December 2023
- CJEU - C-264/19 - Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v. YouTube LLC and Google Inc. (Opinion of AG Saugmandsgaard Øe) (section The decision of the Court)Saugmandsgaard Øe issued his opinion on the Bundesgerichtshof’s (Federal Court of Justice, Germany) request for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of "addresses"8 KB (1,020 words) - 13:14, 1 June 2023
- VG Hannover - 10 A 502/19 (category VG Hannover (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)defendant's decision dated January 8th, 2019. Otherwise, the claim is dismissed. The plaintiff bears the costs of the proceedings. The decision is provisionally41 KB (6,779 words) - 12:35, 24 November 2021
- OLG Stuttgart - 9 U 34/21 (category OLG Stuttgart (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Stuttgart Higher Regional Court - 9th Civil Senate - by the presiding judge at the Higher Regional Court, the judge at the Regional Court and the judge at the60 KB (10,254 words) - 11:22, 22 December 2021
- rejected the DPA's decision to provide them with an opt-out. The decision was then taken to the lower courts in Norway, before the Supreme Court ultimately upheld144 KB (23,058 words) - 18:48, 5 March 2022
- LfD (Lower Saxony) - notebooksbilliger.de (category Germany) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. LfD7 KB (859 words) - 08:24, 18 January 2021
- Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 918/154/2019 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)personal data on the same basis. In the decision of the European Court of Human Rights, M.L. and W.W. vs Germany (issued on June 28, 2018), it has been26 KB (4,072 words) - 12:18, 27 March 2024
- VG Mainz - 1 K 584/19.MZ (category VG Mainz (Germany)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Tenor Paragraph 2 of the decision of 23 November 2018 concerning the order to dismantle Camera 1 and paragraphs 4 and 9 of the decision of 23 November 201858 KB (9,665 words) - 08:51, 25 November 2020