Search results

GDPR will be of special importance in light of Brexit, as undoubtedly new mechanisms for cooperation between the British DPA and UE DPAs will be needed.

may not be instructed in its functions and shall operate independently of other bodies and of undue influence. The tasks of the NAIH may only be determined

2002/58/EC, that Directive should be amended accordingly. Once this Regulation is adopted, Directive 2002/58/EC should be reviewed in particular in order

Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission when provided for by this Regulation. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation

you file the appeal to reach this step. A database for AEPD's decisions can be found in the following page: https://www.aepd.es/es/informes-y-resoluciones/resoluciones

same principles as the GDPR, they should be interpreted homogeneously. This is because Regulation 2018/1725 should be understood as the EU bodies and institution's

Balaiti). The Organisational Chart can be found here. Reference to procedural law ant the procedure of the ANSPDCP can be found here (in RO). You can help us

Board should be set up as an independent body of the Union. To fulfil its objectives, the Board should have legal personality. The Board should be represented

25 May 2018. The Regulation's date of application was deliberately made to be later than its entry into force, for the purpose of creating a two-year transition

agreement is replaced or revoked, it will then no longer be protected by Article 96 GDPR if it is found to be incompatible with other GDPR provisions. → You can

Purposes Special categories of personal data which merit higher protection should be processed for health-related purposes only where necessary to achieve those

another MS, this will be considered as a cross-border case and will be forwarded to the competent supervisory authority which will be responsible for the

procedure. Recital 140: Secretariat and Staff of the EDPS The Board should be assisted by a secretariat provided by the European Data Protection Supervisor

CNPD can be challenged within 3 months. If it is, it will go to a general, administrative tribunal for review. A tribunal decision may also be challenged

completed investigations can be found here. Decisions by the DPA can be found here. Decisions by the Head of the DPA can be found here. You can help us

and, whether or not they have received a response. Attached documents can be the request for access and a document confirming its delivery/sending/submission

Under Section 143 DPA 2018 any decision by the DPC to issue a fine has to be "confirmed" by a Circuit Court. Irish law knows different forms or recourse

filling this section! Appeals against decisions in complaint procedures can be lodged with the Administrative Court. An individual can, in case of a breach

English versions of reports. Last public version (2018) can be found here. Current annual reports can be found on this page.

fines themselves. If fines are not appealed they can be enforced for 30 years. Complaints can be filed in writing, electronically and via fax. LDI can

provisions of the GDPR and references data processing on which the GDPR shall be applicable (§ 2 NDSG). It is more specific to the German Federal Data Protection

provide an overview over which sectors and issues will be prioritized. For 2019-2020 this overview can be found here (in SE). You can help us filling this section

first instance court against a decision taken by the EDPS. Should the decision be appealed by the data subject, this will then go to the Court of Justice (CJEU)

request, while without his or her active participation the complaint cannot be resolved; d) more than three years have passed from the event that is subject

pseudonymisation, which could be attributed to a natural person by the use of additional information should be considered to be information on an identifiable

Harbor and stated that, in order to be "adequate", the level of data protection offered by the third country should be “essentially equivalent” to that being

is an overriding public interest. They require a statutory basis that must be constitutional itself and comply with the principle of legal clarity under

section! You can help us filling this section! The EDPB public agenda can be found here. You can help us filling this section!

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The decision database can be found here. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us by

/2976 Online form submission No written signature required. Signature may be requested after submission Registration free of charge. No proof of knowledge

ongoing procedure and the results of a complaint procedure. Complaints can be filed in electronic form according to § 14(3) BDSG at bfdi.bund.de (in German)

complaints in the private sector within Baden-Württemberg. Complaints can be filed online on the LfDI's website. You can help us by filling in this section

filling in this section! The HmbBfDI provides a form here, but a complaint can be filed also with mail or encrypted e-mail. You can help us by filling in this

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The decision database can be found here, under "Resoluciones y Dictámenes más destacados del Consejo en

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The decision database can be found here. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us by

The CJEU held that consent must be given by a clear affirmative act. Not opting out of pre-ticked boxes was found to be insufficient to establish that consent

such information should not be known to internet users when he considers that it might be prejudicial to him or he wishes it to be consigned to oblivion, even

not to be assessed according to a risk-based approach ("all-or-nothing") could not be accepted. This was not in line with the GDPR and had to be seen against

compensation received under Article 82 GDPR must be regarded as ‘full and effective’, if it allows the damage to be compensated in its entirety, without there

[Hungarian version of Directive 95/46 to translate ‘data processing’] be considered to be equivalent to the usual term for data processing, “adatkezelés”, used

court or DPA, this will be used for titles. Abbreviations of the DPAs can be found in the DPA overview. Abbreviations of courts can be found in the court overview

possibility. Alternatively, the decision may also be appealed in the competent court, which in most cases would be a first instance administrative court (Art

data can also be personal data managed so that this is not processed outside the EU / EEA, that the information about the individual user can be data minimized

means of processing, they shall be joint controllers. The CNIL considers that Google Ireland Ltd and Google LLC should be considered as joint controllers

know and be informed, in particular of the recipients of personal data. The Court pointed out Recital 63 GDPR does not mention that this right can be limited

where only consent should be the relevant legal basis. The NO DPA also considers that data cannot be a commodity and it should not be possible to pay with it:

right to a copy under Article 15(3) GDPR entails that the data subject must be given a faithful and intelligible reproduction of all their personal data

determine whether a person is identifiable, account should be taken of all the means likely reasonably to be used either by the controller or by any other person

It replied to him and stated that "exam scripts do not generally fall to be considered [for data protection purposes] … because this material would not

15(3) of the GDPR is to be seen as an independent right to be provided with the complete information. Otherwise, it would not be possible to check the accuracy

themselves be considered make individuals identifiable, however, it must be considered that these unique identifiers in it the current case can be combined

(basically ordinary personal data, but it cannot be ruled out that sensitive personal data will also be included) will be transferred to unsafe third countries without

affirmative, does it follow from the “right to be forgotten” under Article 17(1)(d) of [the GDPR] that such data must be deleted where the processing period provided

readers to find your summary. Please take care to be very precise, as many elements require each digit to be correct, so that your summary shows up in the

Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, would require Germany to allow that GDPR fines may be initiated directly against an undertaking, despite Germany's administrative

constitutional status. It cannot be repealed "implicitly" as is normally the case with normal Acts of Parliament (it must be done "explicitly"). This was first

teachers are processed via the systems. However, it cannot be ruled out that this information may be included in e-mails from the teachers or via other material

decision on a case, this decision can be appealed within three weeks after receipt of the decision. The appeal has to be submitted to Datatilsynet (Postboks

question that should be answered only by the Data Controller. The same criterion should be answered by any party to whom the data are asked to be disclosed. Secondly

data can be processed in an employment context when it’s necessary for duties or rights under labour law following § 6. Personal data can be processed

review against non-final judgments or judicial acts of any nature which cannot be appealed against by any other means, and in the case of which the legal proceedings

not be used to take decisions or measures relating to the data subject, nor for other purposes. Statistical and scientific research purposes must be clearly

states that the processing cannot be based on Article 6(1)(e) GDPR. For this to be the case, the processing must be necessary for the performance of a

that the data cannot be rectified on the merits and that not all data subjects' rights can be exercised. They could therefore not be subject to the DSGVO

assesses whether the users who enter assessments on the site should be allowed to be anonymous externally. 2. Fact The company Legelisten.no AS (hereinafter

intended to be stored for one month, identification cannot be expected possible during the "lifetime" of the information and they should not be considered

themselves be considered to make individuals identifiable, it must be taken into account that in the present case those unique identifiers can be combined

themselves be considered make individuals identifiable, however, it must be considered that these unique identifiers in it the current case can be combined

disclosure that can be taken into account in this context is also to be assumed if personal data is posted on a platform that can be accessed from a third

must be appropriate and relevant in terms of the purposes of data processing , and must be limited to what is necessary ("data saving"); d) must be accurate

order for there to be a basis for treatment under Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR, three conditions must be met: First, there must be legitimate interests

measures shall be in line with the state of the art. However, this cannot guarantee that in exceptional situations they will always be effective. In addition

adequate must be substantiated. When determining the sanction in concrete terms, the following should be taken into account general criteria should be leading:

to the authorities in individual cases will be subject to inspection in 2021. The decision will therefore be sent to the Police Board and the Helsinki Police

its restriction may only be the exception. However, the rule-exception relationship would be reversed if contract data were to be transferred without any

GDPR) is also taken into account. If a second language was to be used, English would be appropriate, as long as cooperation between supervisory authorities

infringement fee shall be imposed for the illegal camera surveillance, and if a fee is to be imposed, how large the fee shall be. It appears from the case

to be processed in such a way. Regarding the accuracy principle, they argue that accuracy of data released by public bodies must be presumed to be accurate

Protection Act cannot be extended to a data subject applying for insurance. Therefore, Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection Act cannot be applied to the

personal data must be determined according to the purpose of the processing. When this purpose is achieved, the data must either be deleted or be subject to intermediate

remedies should be implemented in the present situation, according to national law. However, the CJEU emphasised that certain safeguards needed to be applied while

contract must be assessed in order to determine what processing is objectively necessary”. However, the DPC added that “necessity is to be determined by

resolve a complaint, or that complaints must be "upheld" or not upheld by the Commissioner. This same argument can be extended to to Articles 77 and 78. Recital

requests for damages will be handled by the General Courts. Claims of damages can also be handled by IMY. Appeals from IMY can be brought before the Administrative

applicant] should be declared inadmissible in his application, or at least that his application should be rejected, and that [the applicant] should be ordered to

from now on be conducted in Dutch with the parties and that in the future provisional and final decisions of the Disputes Chamber will be in Dutch. The

this copy should be a faithful reproduction the personal data, understood in a broad sense, that are subject to operations that can be classified as ‘processing

data by the operator must be regarded as processing special categories of personal data. The CJEU held that such practices must be regarded as processing

Justice. More precisely, admissibility requirements can be found below: Regarding the decision: it can be the lack of response or the notification of the CNIL's

that processing for purposes of research, artistic and literary purposes must be balances with the right to freedom of expression and the right to information

two suspects involved. Mr. Rynes handed over to the police the recording to be relied on in the criminal proceedings. One of the suspects questioned the

information about the policies and activities of the government”. Personal data can be processed for the purposes of recruitment, employment and tax purposes. Data

with the exception of Article 28-32, which still applies. Personal data may be processed under Article 6 and Article 9 for the purpose of fulfilling employment

provides that «In cases of particular urgency and in which the Guarantor cannot be convened in good time, the president can adopt the measures pertaining to

ePrivacy Directive is implemented with L. 3471/2006. Relevant provisions can be found in L. 3431/2006, L. 3674/2008, L. 3783/2009, L. 3917/2011 and L. 4070/2012

the payment account if the worker has not requested that the remuneration be paid in his/her own hands. Both at the stage of recruitment and for the purpose

artistic or literary expression. The provision mentions that these purposes must be proportionate to their objective and respect the essence of the rights as

required safeguards are implemented to ensure that the personal data can only be used for such purposes. Wet politiegegevens (the Police Data Act), regulates

must be taken into account. In summary, it can be stated that the European Court of Human Rights has confirmed that the following factors should be taken

fundamental rights may be applicable to the individual case and that requirements to be observed may result from this. Such requirements must be taken into account