Search results

case of monocratic jurisdiction, there is administration (Muzak, B-VG6 Art 87 R 2 f). According to Article 87, paragraph 2, B-VG, a judge is “in the exercise

detailed presentation can be dispensed with in this respect. 2.2.3 Regarding W 258 2216873, the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) in its decision of 30

AUGUST 2021 [doc. web n. 9685994] Order injunction against Deliveroo Italy s.r.l. - July 22, 2021 Record of measures n. 285 of 22 July 2021 THE GUARANTOR

random=1672750512146 &cv=11&fst=1672747200000&bg=fffff&guid=ON&async=1&gtm=2oabu0&u_w=1920 &u_h=1080&frm=0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telekom.de%2Fstart &tiba=Teleko

this case was the complaint of the Bank [...] Spółka Akcyjna with its seat in W. against the decision of the President of the Personal Data Protection Office

person with NIPC 506204367 and headquarters at Rua de Sao Tomee Principe, 18 r/c Oto. , 2900-087 Setubal, dedicates itself to support for immigrants from

breach by TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W., President of the Personal Data Protection Office,finding that TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W. has breached

plaintiff (...) with its seat in W. purchased the debt from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its seat in W. Party to the loan agreement

original for more details. 1/7  File No.: TD / 00044/2021 RESOLUTION NO: R / 00423/2021 Considering the claim made before this Agency by A.A.A. (hereinafter

that AEPD R/02863/2016 of December 14 - Procedure No.: A/00242/2016-, R/02906/2015 of December 17 November- Procedure No.: A/00172/2015- or R/00001/2015

itself (cf. BVerfG, resolution of 21 April 2015 - 2 BvR 1322/12, 2 BvR 1989/12 -, juris recital 52 m. w. N.; SächsOVG, decision of 29. April 2020 - 3 B 144/20

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 3 5 5 - 1/2 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

Division heard the case on 15 January 2019, where the Board, represented by W.J.R. Krol and L. Schieving, and [appellant under 2], represented by [agent],

Court of August 22, 2019, Zl. W256 2213660-1/4E, regarding a data protection matter (participating parties: 1. C GmbH in W, represented by Dr. Friedrich

BRUSSELS, JosephStevensstraat7, fifth applicant, 6. LIGUE DES DROITS HUMAINS V.Z.W. c/o, with registered office at 1000 Brussels, Kogelstraat 22, but choosing

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 2 6 3 8 - 1/1 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

DECISIONS D A T U M 0 7 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 1 0 1 2 2 0 8 2 3 8 - 1/5 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through

Court of Finance, judgement of 26 June 2019, 11 LA 274/18. 19 March 2013, II R 17/11, loc. cit., decision of 15 September 2010, II B 4/10; regarding the InsO:

[place of residence], plaintiffs by subpoena dated June 2, 2020, lawyers mr. W. Brussee in The Hague and mr. S. van Londen in Hilversum, against the legal

no further payment stoppages or defaults (BVwG W 2 58 2216873-1 on a similar case; confirmed by BVwG W274 22 3 2028-1). The age of the claim or the point

Jagielska, J. Jagielski, R. Stankiewicz, M. Grzywacz, art. 149, in: Law on proceedings before administrative courts. Commentary, ed. R. Hauser, M. Wierzbowski

down the more or else requested. This decision was made by Mrs. N.W.M. van den Heuvel, R.R.M. the Moor and T. van der Valk and was pronounced in public on

where appropriate, of the personal data. - With reference to its Resolution R/00818/2012, the capture of images of public spaces by private surveillance

Provincial Administrative Court in Rzeszów (Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Rzeszowie - WSA Rzeszów). The WSA Rzeszów overturned the decision from the

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 1 6 6 - 1/4 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

Regional Court) as the court of appeal of 24 April 2020, GZ 14 R 159. April 2020, GZ 14 R 159/19h-13, whereby the judgment of the Regional Court for Civil

Procedure. The Kp. Pursuant to Article 12 (2) (a) of the Administrative P r o c e d u r e Act, an administrative action against a decision of the Authority is

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

at Decision date July 10, 2023 business number W256 2234976-1/19E W256 2234976-2/19E I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Federal Administrative Court

original for more details. Ro 2020/04/0031-9 February 1, 2024 I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Administrative Court has through the presiding Senate President

during the control activity: see previous point 1.1., spec. letter m., r., t ., w.), preordained to assign a score to the rider for the declared purpose

without, however, sharing the PIN and PUK codes ”(see cit. note, p. 24, 25); r. “Company telephone and SIM therefore remained available to the Complainant

Duschel, Mag. Klaus Hanten, lawyers in Vienna, against the defendant City of W*****, represented by Dr. Andreas Joklik, lawyer in Vienna. Andreas Joklik,

Spanish original for more details. 1/4  File No.: EXP202203923 RESOLUTION Nº: R/00738/2022 Having regard to the claim made on March 7, 2022 before this Agency

He also referred to an article he wrote about the GDPR in the magazine "f & w lead and manage in the hospital", issue 02/17. The penultimate sentence of

of the original. Please refer to the Bulgarian original for more details. R E W E N I E No. 8 Sofia, 15 November 20 1 9 (Promulgated SG No. 99 of November

is mandatory if the conditions are met (see VG Würzburg, B.v. 28.1.2020 - W 8 E 19.1669 - juris marginal no. 48; Rathke in Zipfel/Rathke, Lebensmittelrecht

M. Georgieva and T. Mitova, acting as Agents, – the French Government, by R. Bénard, A.-L. Desjonquères, D. Dubois and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents, –

has a right to refuse to give evidence or testify (see BayVGH, loc.cit. m.w.N.). The order pursuant to § 31a para. 1 sentence 1 StVZO does not presuppose

[Name of company], at [place], plaintiff, authorized representative: mr. H.W.J. melting head, and the State Secretary for Economic Affairs and Climate (Telecom

easy to understand: see eg Thaler R and Sunstein C, Nudge: The Final Edition (2021), pp 36-38; Samuelson W and Zeckhauser R, “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making”

Administrative Court Decision date June 21, 2021 Business number W274 2237071-1 Saying W274 2237071-1 / 10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

the evidence procedure carried out: 1.1. On April 24, 2023, Mr. Sebastian W*** (Managing Director of B*** - hereinafter “GF”) submitted a security breach

of its partners (Business Promoter s.r.l.) by an agent of a sub-agency contracted by the latter (Top Solutions s.r.l.), confirming that the called number

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 08/26/2021 Business number W274 2242363-1 Saying W274 2242363-1 / 4E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

the cases of the ECtHR Węgrzynowski and Smolczevski v. Poland and M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, and the case of SEU Camera di commercio, Industria, Artigianato

Administrative Court Decision date December 06, 2021 Business number W274 2243175-1 Saying W274 2243175-1 / 3E The Federal Administrative Court, through the

the browser. 1 S.3. about the use of cookies in the context of pseudonymous r ng, users are informed in this Data protectionMkUrung Informed 5.4 If you do

agreement concluded on May 5, 2014. Although the PESEL number of the defendant J. R. was used when concluding the agreement, but the indicated place of residence

(BVwG 30.10.2019, W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24

Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of April 26, 2021, GZ 11 R 51/21g-31, with which the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Law

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA, rules on the appeal of Mag. XXXX , p. A. XXXX , represented

demonstration to a press representative: VG Würzburg, decision of February 13, 2015 – W 7 E 15.81, juris). According to Section 123 (1) VwGO, the court can issue an

2022 and December 14 December 2022 (access the URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_A***&oldid=*5*7**2). 4. The entry about the complainant

of a superior (cf. OVG NW, B.v. May 11, 2023 - 1 A 2432/20 - juris Rn. 11 m.w.N.). The documents in dispute mainly consist of events from the years 2004

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the experts Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the appeal of XXXX ,

for checking compliance with the provisions of the Stock Exchange Act , MiFI R and MAR standardized obligations can be made possible (as above, paragraph

of the accrued extrajudicial Business fee according to §§ 13, 14 No. 2300 W RVG in the amount of 711.03 euros plus 5 percentage points above exempt base

Paragraph 2 In connection with the construction of a nursing home in C-town in W-street X, the plaintiff commissioned the expert office of the second defendant

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the complaint of XXXX

principles of the so-called Stolpe case-law (BVerfG, order of 25 October 2005, 1 BvR 1696/98), which the plaintiff invokes in a written statement of 20 October

vicinity Train station in W... are the lawyers from the law firm G...-D... Rechtsanwälte... 35 https://www.rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-w....de/achten-agg-hoppe

not, the main Subject to legal proceedings (see OLG Karlsruhe 16.02.2011 - 4 W 108/10 - Rn.17) - 4 - a) In view of the specific circumstances of the individual

13/2005 DSG Art. 2 § 9 valid from January 1st, 2000 to March 31st, 2005 saying W274 2243598-1/10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative Court

advice in order to be clarified. According to §§ 2 Para. 2, 13 RVG No. 2300 W RVG, the claim amounts to €1,029.35. Since the cross-appeal does not attack

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

of 28.04.2020 - 1 S 1068/20 -, and of 30.04.2020 - 1 S 1101/20 -, each m.w.N.). In view of this, the provision in Section 3 (1) sentence 3 CoronaVO on

Innsbruck Higher Regional Court as court of appeal of 22 August 2019, GZ 2 R 96/19p-36, thus reversing the judgment of the Regional Court Feldkirch of 9

www.bvwg.gv.at decision date 03.02.2022 business number W214 2224204-1/28E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through

9 ff). for the use of a website requires prior consent (cf. Article 29 -, W, P, Opinion 04/2012 on Cookie Consent Exemption, WP 194, 00879/12/EN p. 9 ff)

December 1, 2018, rdb.at), see also BVwG November 23, 2020, W211 2227144-1; BVwG 8/13/2021, W211 2222613-1. But even with a direct applicability of Art.

for an amount of 2,175.00 euros and 2,713.00 euros. It also provides a CD-R containing the recording of the telephone conversation maintained with the

in: Zöller, code of civil procedure, 33rd edition 2020, § 56 ZPO, para. 8 m.w.N.). 31Since the authenticity of the document, by means of which the authorization

Reply to the CNPD. Cf. ibid. "Cf. information available on Elias /'Vor/dão r Ora/find-or4 and attached to the case file as Document "worldcoin - Data collection

plaintiff, but generally with the credit institutions according to §§ 675 v -675 w BGB. § 675 v BGB is the central liability standard in the legal relationship

no. 19 - 20, juris; differently, however, Senate, decision of 19.4.2021 - 4 W 243/21 -, juris). However, this can also be left aside here, because the risk

(BGH ruling of April 9, 2014 - VIII ZR 404/12 = BeckRS 2014 , 9743 Rn. 23 m.w.N.; Grüneberg/Grünberg, BGB commentary, 81st edition 2022, § 305 Rz. 4). In

organizing body above the school Z and the Vrij Centrum for it pupil guidance W, but since a CLB must be able to act independently, they appear to be acting

the matters mentioned in Section 28 WEG (cf. LGZ Graz December 15, 2006, 3 R 139/06t and within the meaning of Paragraph 29, Paragraph one, WEG, especially

decision of January 27, 2022 in the dispute value complaint proceedings (Az.: 15 W 55/21, Bl. 1649 f d.A.) - to be calculated from an object value of 5,000 euros

Constitutional Court of BW, decision of 22 January 2020 loc. cit., BA p. 15 m.w.n.). With regard to the scope of the resolution, an intentional discretion

Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of January 18, 2021, GZ 11 R 188/20b Co KG in Vienna, for providing an Information in accordance with Article

2021 - 16 U 275/20, juris para. 69; KG, decision of February 2, 2021 - 9 W 1117/20, juris para. 44). 78 Such displacement of the claim from Art. 82 (1)

judgment Accused: Martin N ***, born on: 13.06.19 **, S *** straße 2 *, 1 *** W *** As the person responsible within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 7 of Regulation

(Implementation) Organisation Structure Act (SUWI), such as the UWV, SVB, B&W colleges, the Tax and Customs Administration and the SZW Inspectorate, and

authority data.nl Confidential/Registered Minister of Foreign Affairs Deheermr.W.B.HoekstraMBA Rijnstraat8 2515XPDenHaag Date Unidentified 24 February 2022

the Police Act 1996: see R (Miller) v College of Policing [2020] EWHC 255 (Admin); [2020] HRLR 10, para 102 and R (Officer W80) v Director General of the

Constitutional Court, judgment of December 15, 1983 - 1 BvR 209/83 -, juris, para. 150 f. m.w.N.; BVerwG, judgment of September 27, 2018 - 7 C 5.17 -, juris

enforcement of EU law - and thus also the DS-GVO (LG Munich I a.a.O. Rn. 41 with w.N.). 38 Based on the extent of the stolen personal data communicated to the

earlier and more accurately (BayVGH, B.v. March 7, 2022, a.a.O., Rn. 31 m.w.N. ). According to Article 24 Paragraph 4 Sentence 2 GO, only data that is

yours, either in its entirety or in the precise arrangement and composition r elements are generally known or readily accessible to those in the circles

(cf. Sachs, in: Sachs, Basic Law, 9th edition 2021, Art. 1, para. 52 ff. m.w.N.). In addition, the plaintiff is exercising her fundamental right to data

fifty thousand euros). 21 Yours faithfully, Dutch Data Protection Authority, w.g. mr.A.Wolfsen Chair 2The AP will hand over the aforementioned claim to the

2021, in addition to the parties to the present emergency application, Mr W. was also present as an expert for the Hessian Data Protection Commissioner

decision of July 4, 2019 - 7 C 31.17 - NVwZ-RR 2019, 1015 marginal number 24 with w. N.), the now deciding Senate does not maintain. The notion of "Fiscal Area"

507/15, VersR 2016, 1236; BGH, judgment of December 2, 2015 - IV ZR 28/15, VersR 2016, 173; BGH, judgment of . June 26, 2013 - IV ZR 39/10, VersR 2013, 1381)

of human rights of CAIXABANK because it limits itself to considering that “[w]hen the EDPB refers to to an "increase in commissions" it is evident that it

of February 10, 2023 - 8 O 177/22, GRUR-RS 2023, 2621 marginal number 77 m.w.N.).Abs. 91Recitals 75 and 85 list some possible damages, including identity

for more details. Ro 2021/04/0010-11 December 21, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Administrative Court has through the presiding Senate President

Vienna Higher Regional Court as Court of Appeal of 7 February 2019, GZ 133 R 113/18t-17, which partially confirmed and partially amended the judgment of