Search results

GmbH). Company A used the services of company C (Amazon Web Services EMEA S.à r.l.) a subsidiary of company D (Amazon Web Services, Inc.) based in the United

reasons cited must suffice to Decision to wear. r PAGE 01-00001823325-0031-0040-02-01-� �!l�l!I L oo-w. _J, Court of Appeal Brussels -2020/AR/813- p. 32

AFFICHE_W in addition to verifying that they are not necessary cookies, are identified by the website itself as advertising, IDE and AFFICHE_W or, They

for example, KG Berlin, Order of 4 July 2017 - 1 W 153/16 - StAZ 2018, 183 and of 1 August 2013 - 1 W 413/12 - StAZ 2013, 348). 51 In administrative court

regard to bringing the processing into line with aforementioned provisions. r PAGE 01-00002223628-0002-0011-1-01-01-� L _JCourt of appeal Brussels-2021/AR/282-

confirms the contested decision. This decision was made by Mrs. A.R. Sturhoofd, J.H. Lieber and J.W. van Zaane and pronounced in public on June 1, 2021 by the

ECLI:NL:HR:2017:208, NJ 2017/134 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and YES 2017/56 m.t. M.R. Hebly (Donata/New India), para. 3.3.3 (which statement is also cited in footnote

v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise (1973) 2 AllE.R 943 and Banker’s Trust v. Shabira (1980) 1 W.L.R 1274 are covered by this Law and, by extension, are

processing of data, determined in a G e . m P E P ro p o r ti o n d of f a l e r e c t a r e n t s o S R C T P AV deceived by interested parties. Since then

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 09.08.2021 Business number W211 2222613-2 Saying W211 2222613-2/12E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court decides

as: [defendant] , authorized representatives: mr. O.A. Sleeking and mr. A.W.D. lensink. 1. The process 1.1. The course of the procedure follows from the

principle of 3DPG refers to ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2021:1296,r.o.8. 3DPG refers to ECLI:NL:RVS:2020:2833,r.o.5.2. 3Research reportAP of September 29, 2021, appendix

appeal. Adopted by mr. J.A.W. Scholten-Hinloopen, chairman, and mr. J.J. van Eck and mr. B. Meijer, members, in the presence of mr. E.R. Fernandez, clerk. The

appellants, by ABN AMRO BANK N.V., established in Amsterdam, Intimate, Lawyer: Mr. R.L. Ubels in Amsterdam. 1Process 1.1 Appellants are hereinafter jointly referred

hedonists 11.54% The supplier of the above data is: W *** Direkt GmbH ***Street * 1 *** Vienna Email: office@w***.at Planned storage period: If data transfer

212-1, L.212-3, L.2141-1, L.211-1, L.232-1, R.631-3, L.621-1, L.621-2, L.621-7, L. 621-8, R.111-2, R.111-3, R.212-1, - Considering the law n ° 78-17 of January

the provisions on the protection of personal data by Ms. K.W. running a business under the name W. with its place of business in O. at ul. (…), President

and Food Safety Act (GESG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 63/2002 as amended. R E G R O U N D U N G A. Arguments of the parties and procedure Arguments of the

entity: H**** non-profit housing AG (FN 1*5*9* r) The accused legal entity, based in **** R***stadt, W***straße 1*-5* (hereinafter “H****”), is the responsible

was written on the patient A. W. But these are not the data of this patient. The data belongs to patient A. W. Patient A. W. does not exist with such data

Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 15 May 2018, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2018:4396, JA 2018/99 m.nt. R.W.M. Giard, r. 4.5. 49Parliamentary Papers II 1989/90, 21561, no. 3 (explanatory memorandum)

reasons disapproved by the court (see W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 29th edition 2023, § 121 Rn. 9f. m.w.N. ). The legal issues that are the subject

Social Welfare Center in G., the Housing Cooperative in G. G., U. Sp. z o. o. w G .. The need to obtain the requested personal data was justified by the fear

defendant herself, but their data protection officer Ms. J. R., who is based at the parent company R. According to Art. 12 (1) GDPR, a person responsible only

submitting an application through a broker or R. SA, an agent cooperating with the broker or an employee of an outlet of R. SA is involved in the process of submitting

spelling, grammar and punctuation errors have been corrected.] NOTICE S P R U C H The DPA decides on Gustav A***'s privacy complaints (Appellant) of August

situation applicable at the time of the last oral hearing. 25 Cf. W.-R. Schenke / R.P. Schenke, in: Kopp / Schenke, VwGO, 27th edition 2021, § 113 Rn.

the AP, represented by W. van Steenbergen and J.M.A. Koster, have appeared. Connexxion, represented by mr. E.C. de Vries and mr. J.R. van Dorp, lawyers in

Chamber),composed of D. Spielmann, President, V. Valančius (Rapporteur) and R. Mastroianni, Judges,Registrar: V. Di Bucci,having regard to the written part

downloadable at the address: h t t p: / / a r e a d o c u m e n t a l. s e r v i z i r l. i t / a t t i / d o w n l o a d /AAAAYBnbrd+mLfAGu+72pN0QYxN3M4

mr. M.G.J.M. van Kempen, chairman, and mr. R. den Ouden and mr. V.F.R. Woeltjes, in the presence of mr. P.W.L. van den Bersselaar as clerk. The decision

appeal Brussels -2020/AR/582- p. 6 2. The written procedure (Article 755 Judg. W.). Partly in view of the health risks that the COVID-19 pandemic entails and

which is different or more advanced. This order was issued by R.R.M. de Moor, A.J. Henzen and M.W.M. Souren and publicly announced on 6 August 2020.

-BFH-, judgments of April 11, 2012, I R 63/11, Federal Tax Gazette -BStBl - II 2012, 539; of December 16, 1987 - I R 66/84 -, collection of officially unpublished

(LG Frankfurt a.M., decision of 10.09.2018 - 2-03 O 310/18, MMR 2018, 770 m.w.r.). According to these provisions, a ban can also be justified under Article

plaintiff is the wife of... G. The defendant is the editor of the magazine "W". In issue no. 40 of ... 2015, the defendant published an article entitled

constituency (BVerfG, decision of September 20, 2016 - 2 BvR 2453/15 -, juris para. 21 [m. w.n.]). The Office of the State Commissioner for Data Protection

right to request to be heard by the Disputes Chamber of the GBA. The petition w was notified to the GBA by court order dated 9 May 2019 with summons to appear

ambassador sent by the government of ****, who had been the project coordinator for W*** for the first respondent since May 1, 2022 for a period of 12 months. The

registered office in W. purchased a receivable from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its registered office in W. A party to the loan

Protocoleptor Bożena Kowalska on the action brought by Mr C. v. A. K. and W. G. with the participation of the Public Prosecutor and the Ombudsman to protect

October 1966 - 2 BvR 506/63, NJW 1967, 195; judgment of 30 June 1976 - 2 BvR 435/76, NJW 1976, 1883; order of 14 July 1981 - 1 BvR 575/80). This therefore

Ms. S.P. gave the signature to the head nurse, K.R., and after that date the signature was with K.R. so that she could continue to update the vaccination

Borman, member of the single chamber, in the presence of Mr R. Grimbergen, Registrar. w.g. Borman w.g. Grimbergen member of the single chamber of the Registrar

Daalder, chairman, and mr. C.C.W. Lange and mr. W. den Ouden, members, in the presence of mr. B. Ley-Nell, registrar. w.g. descender chair The Registrar

Gundelach, members, in the presence of mr. A.M.E.A. Neuwahl, clerk. w.g. from Altena chair w.g. Neuwahl clerk Pronounced in public on July 20, 2022 280-973

that each party bears its own costs. This decision was made by Mrs. R.R.M. de Moor, J.W. van Rijkom and T. van der Valk and pronounced in public on 15 July

Vienna Higher Regional Court as the court of appeal of 9 December 2020, GZ 14 R 143/20g24, whereby the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Matters

only provisionally (see BVerfG, Order of 19.10.2006 - 2 BvR 2023/06, juris, marginal no. 13, EuR 2006, 814).

ambassador sent by the government of ****, who had been the project coordinator for W*** for the first respondent since May 1, 2022 for a period of 12 months. The

referred to in Chapter IX, European Union law or theItpotr 0r,-0000r53sesê-00r,r,-00as-01,-0r-flL ffiJ Page 13 Brussels Court of Appeal - 20201 AR/II60 -

used A. S.à.r.l. as a subcontractor. The agreement between the third party and A. S.à.r.l. in implementation Article 28 GDPR allowed A. S.à.r.l. to disclose

for customer service, product development and BU performance testing) and R. S. (assistant to the branch manager in Austria and data protection officer)

gImkxOG4uaW1wb3J0Lm9yLnBhc3RlLmNvbnRlbnQiIDogIlR1byAvIExpaXTDpCBzaXPDpGx0w7YiLAogICJpMThuLmNob29zZS50ZXh0LmFsaWduIiA6ICJWYWxpdHNlIHRla3N0aW4gdGFzYXVzI

office in W. at Al. (…), President of the Personal Data Protection Office, finding a violation by H. Sp. z o. o. with its registered office in W. at Al.

administrative court dr S...the judge at the administrative court P...the judge R...and by honorary judge...honorary judge...on the basis of the hearing on November

Minister), consisting in the delivery to the addressee by the postal operator R. (...) of a damaged and incomplete correspondence containing personal data

authority data.nl Confidential/Registered UWV Board of Directors Attn. Mr.M.R.P.M.Camps PO Box58285 1040HG AMSTERDAM Date Unidentified May 31, 2021 [CONFIDENTIAL]

probability speaks in favour of success in the main proceedings as well (see only W.-R. Schenke, in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 24th ed. 2018, para. 123 marginal no. 14

This statement was made by mr. G.H.W. Bodt, chairman, mr. S.A. van Hoof and mr. M. Ichoh, judges, in the presence of R. van Diest, registrar. The decision

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 4 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 3 2 2 2 6 2 6 1 - 1/8 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court has

place in disregard of the suspensive effect of an appeal, 29 cf. on this: W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 27th edition 2021, § 80 Rdn. 20. 30 This

rule, were only displayed in full to employees who worked with them (e.g. W, S, Receivables Management), while only the last four digits of the IBAN were

yet been conclusively clarified by case law (cf. Sesing MMR 2021, 544, 547 m.w.N. ). In the event of a dispute, the question of such a requirement of equivalence

[residence], APPLICANT for cassation, hereinafter: [person involved], lawyer: H.J.W. alto, against GOOGLE LLC, based in Mountain View, California, United States

in the case between [plaintiff] , in Amstelveen, plaintiff (Agents: mr. E.W.S. Peperkamp, mr. S.E.A. Vermeer-de Jongh and mr. G.N.N. camp house), and Dutch

April 15, 2021 at the litigation secretariat of the Council of State, Ms. W ... A ..., Mr. AA ... U ... and Mrs Y ... O ... ask the Council of State: 1

lawyer's salary. This decision was made by Mrs. H.J. van Kooten, R.S. van Coevorden and R.W. Polak, and was pronounced in open court on 14 December 2021 in

</script><script> (function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o)

as: [defendant] , authorized representatives: mr. O.A. Sleeking and mr. A.W.D. lensink. 1. The process 1.1. The course of the procedure follows from the

statement was made by mr. L.M. Reijnierse, judge, in the presence of mr. E.H.W. Schierbeek, clerk. The decision was pronounced on November 10, 2020 and will

November 26, 2020, GZ 3 R 128 / 20v-15 , with which the judgment of the Salzburg Regional Court of August 14, 2020, GZ 4 Cg 67 / 19w-9, was partially amended

refers to the judgment of the Federal Fiscal Court of October 28, 2009 (VIII R 78/05) and the ruling of the Bavarian State Office for Taxes of March 28, 2020

telephone (video) connection. The agents of defendants J. Stoffels (Roerdalen), R. Timmers (Valkenburg aan de Geul), M. Orasanin (Vaals) and Mr. A.A.C.M. Gidding-Baade

Bodewits), and the Dutch Data Protection Authority, defendant (attorneys: mr. W. van Steenbergen and mr. E Nijhof). Procedure By decision of 23 September 2019

operates in Belgium, and the complainant has been a senior executive of Company W for some time. years, i.e. a company that is closely related to Company Z.

business number W245 2252208-1/36E W245 2252221-1/30E Written copy of the verbal decision announced on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K 

of 26 January 2006, p. 1). July 2017 - RiZ (R) 3/16 -, juris marginal no. 15 and of 16 March 2005 - RiZ (R) 2/04 -, juris marginal no. 20; VG Potsdam,

represented by his counsel Mr. Dr. Jan-Henning Strunz, Matray, Matray & Hallet, s.c.r.l, rue des Fories, 2, 4020 Liège, hereinafter “the plaintiff” The defendant:

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 9 . 0 4 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 8 2 2 4 7 0 2 8 - 1 / 1 1 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court

case of monocratic jurisdiction, there is administration (Muzak, B-VG6 Art 87 R 2 f). According to Article 87, paragraph 2, B-VG, a judge is “in the exercise

detailed presentation can be dispensed with in this respect. 2.2.3 Regarding W 258 2216873, the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) in its decision of 30

AUGUST 2021 [doc. web n. 9685994] Order injunction against Deliveroo Italy s.r.l. - July 22, 2021 Record of measures n. 285 of 22 July 2021 THE GUARANTOR

random=1672750512146 &cv=11&fst=1672747200000&bg=fffff&guid=ON&async=1&gtm=2oabu0&u_w=1920 &u_h=1080&frm=0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telekom.de%2Fstart &tiba=Teleko

this case was the complaint of the Bank [...] Spółka Akcyjna with its seat in W. against the decision of the President of the Personal Data Protection Office

person with NIPC 506204367 and headquarters at Rua de Sao Tomee Principe, 18 r/c Oto. , 2900-087 Setubal, dedicates itself to support for immigrants from

breach by TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W., President of the Personal Data Protection Office,finding that TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W. has breached

plaintiff (...) with its seat in W. purchased the debt from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its seat in W. Party to the loan agreement

original for more details. 1/7  File No.: TD / 00044/2021 RESOLUTION NO: R / 00423/2021 Considering the claim made before this Agency by A.A.A. (hereinafter

that AEPD R/02863/2016 of December 14 - Procedure No.: A/00242/2016-, R/02906/2015 of December 17 November- Procedure No.: A/00172/2015- or R/00001/2015

itself (cf. BVerfG, resolution of 21 April 2015 - 2 BvR 1322/12, 2 BvR 1989/12 -, juris recital 52 m. w. N.; SächsOVG, decision of 29. April 2020 - 3 B 144/20

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 3 5 5 - 1/2 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

Division heard the case on 15 January 2019, where the Board, represented by W.J.R. Krol and L. Schieving, and [appellant under 2], represented by [agent],

Court of August 22, 2019, Zl. W256 2213660-1/4E, regarding a data protection matter (participating parties: 1. C GmbH in W, represented by Dr. Friedrich

BRUSSELS, JosephStevensstraat7, fifth applicant, 6. LIGUE DES DROITS HUMAINS V.Z.W. c/o, with registered office at 1000 Brussels, Kogelstraat 22, but choosing

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 2 6 3 8 - 1/1 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

DECISIONS D A T U M 0 7 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 1 0 1 2 2 0 8 2 3 8 - 1/5 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through

Court of Finance, judgement of 26 June 2019, 11 LA 274/18. 19 March 2013, II R 17/11, loc. cit., decision of 15 September 2010, II B 4/10; regarding the InsO:

[place of residence], plaintiffs by subpoena dated June 2, 2020, lawyers mr. W. Brussee in The Hague and mr. S. van Londen in Hilversum, against the legal

no further payment stoppages or defaults (BVwG W 2 58 2216873-1 on a similar case; confirmed by BVwG W274 22 3 2028-1). The age of the claim or the point