Search results

155 (1) sentence 1 VwGO. The decision on the provisional enforceability is based on Section 167 Paragraph 1 Clause 1 and Paragraph 2 VwGO in conjunction with

information specified in more detail in the operative part, Section 113 (5) sentence 1 VwGO. 18th The legal basis for the claim is Art. 3 Para. 1 BayUIG. According

and law which impairs the party relations (cf. on § 91 VwGO Schoch/Schneider/Bier-Ortloff/Riese, VwGO Kommentar, 36 EL 2019, § 91 marginal no. 61), it corresponds

costs is based on Section 154 (1) VwGO. 52 The decision on provisional enforceability follows from Section 167 VwGO in conjunction with Sections 708 No

status: 44th EL March 2023, Section 42 Paragraph 2 VwGO Rn. 102; W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke VwGO, 29th edition 2023, Section 63 Rn. 7). The plaintiff

costs results from Section 154 (1) VwGO. 52 The decision on the provisional enforceability follows from § 167 VwGO in conjunction with §§ 708 No. 11, 711

with Article 19 (3) GG, so that Section II pursuant to Section 113 (1) sentence 1 VwGO had to be repealed. c) The formally lawful threat of fines in Section

(4) sentences 1 and 6 VwGO), is unsuccessful. The administrative court rightly rejected the application under Section 80 (5) VwGO for the restoration or

lawful and does not violate the plaintiff's rights (Section 113 Paragraph 5 Sentence 1 VwGO).aa) The basis for the plaintiff's request is Article 15 Paragraph

is lawful and does not violate the plaintiff's rights (Section 113 (5) sentence 1 VwGO, see 1.). As far as deceased persons are concerned, the plaintiff

147 paragraph 5, § 496 paragraph 3 AO § 91, § 364 GDPR Art. 2 Para. 2 d, Art. 4 No. 7, Art. 12 Para. 1, Art. 13 Para. 4, Art. 14 Para. 5 a, Art. 15, Art

incur a cost risk (see § 154.3 VwGO). IV. Paragraph91 The decision on provisional enforceability is based on § 167 VwGO in conjunction with § 708 no. 11

plaintiff's rights (see § 113.5 sentence 1 VwGO). 53 The claim of the plaintiff is based on Art. 15 para. 3 sentence 1, Art. 12 para. 5 sentence 1 DSGVO in conjunction

on costs follows from Section 154 (1) VwGO. The decision on the provisional enforceability is based on § 167 VwGO in conjunction with § 708 No. 11 and §

2 were lawful and did not violate the plaintiff's rights under § 113.1 sentence 1 VwGO.19 The information order was formally lawful, the defendant was responsible

basis: Articles 5, 6, 13, 14, 35 and 36 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (data protection Basic Regulation, hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; REASON

therefore already based on the rejection of interim relief under Section 47(6) VwGO. However, constitutional legal protection is in principle also denied if

costs follows from Section 155 (2) VwGO. Otherwise, the decision on costs is based on Section 155 (1) sentence 1 VwGO. 123The appeal was not allowed because

Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016, p. 1; § 24 paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette

meaning of § 6 para 1 no. 5 KSchG (Eccher in Fenyves/Kerschner/Vonkilch, Klang3 § 6 para 1 no. 5 KSchG Rz 5 f; Kathrein/Schoditsch in KBB5 § 6 KSchG Rz 11 [aE];