Search results

1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from May 25th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2

Section 1 DSG goes beyond that of Art. 8 EU-GRC, so that Section 1 (1) DSG does not apply at all. But even if one were to see an application of § 1 DSG, the

the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG). Due to the derogations in § 9(1) DSG, the DSB would hence not be competent to handle the complaint

to Section 1 (1) DSG must be checked and restrictions on this right may result from Section 1 (2) DSG. 14. According to Section 1 (2) DSG, restrictions on

act, with a written statement dated October 16, 2020, received on October 27, 2020, and applied for the complaint to be dismissed with reference to the

proceedings. Pursuant to Article 69 (4) of the DSG, proceedings pending before the ordinary courts under the DSG 2000 at the time of entry into force of this

the StVO. 2 DSG and Art. 8 para. 2 ECHR and justify such an intervention.§ 98a para. 2 first sentence StVO 1960 therefore violates § 1 DSG and Art. 8 ECHR

2009, p. 1. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016, p. 1; section 29 Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; section 17 General Administrative

with the documents submitted in them (ruling of the Regional Court of Wels of 27.12.2019; ruling of the Regional Court of Karlsruhe of 2.8.2019; decision of

application of Section 1 (1) DSG requires, among other things, that the data is personal. According to Section 1 (2) DSG, restrictions on the right to

held that the disclosure of data under § 1 Austrian Data Protection Act (DSG) was lawful. In particular, Austrian law allowed for parties to be represented

Council of 27 June 2016/679 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the competent authorities of 27 April 2016

an entry according to § 24 DSG and is therefore not covered by the fee and tax exemption clause of § 69 Paragraph 6 DSG. 27. This sum is to be paid into

2016; §§ 4 Paragraph 6, 24 Paragraph 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Sections 2, 3, 80 of the Federal

apply § 12 and § 13 of the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) that specifically deal with the processing of pictures (including videos)

represented by Dr. Josef B***, lawyer in ****, of 22 October 2020 (ha. received on 27 October 2020) against N*** Ärztezentrum - Dr. U*** & Co GmbH (respondent)

providers could not be derived from § 4 DSG 2000. The clause therefore complied with the provisions of the DSG and was not intransparent. The court of

eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0058 National_Law_Name_1=§ 29 DSG National_Law_Link_1=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/1999/165/A2P29/NOR40195925

eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0058 National_Law_Name_1=§ 29 DSG National_Law_Link_1=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/1999/165/A2P29/NOR40195925

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing