Search results

superior, up to 4 % of the undertaking’s total worldwide annual turnover, is determined taking into account the type of violation (Article 83(4)(5) GDPR) as

decisions from third-country courts and administrative authorities in the EU. An ex-territorial judicial order to transfer or disclose personal data outside of

Regulation 2016/679’, 4 May 2020 (Version 1.1), pp. 7-8 (available here). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679’, 4 May 2020 (Version

'Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default', 20 October 2020 (Version 2.0), pp. 8-9 (available here). EDPB, 'Guidelines 4/2019

Information exchanged shall be used only for the purpose for which it was requested. 4. The requested supervisory authority shall not refuse to comply with the request

right to the protection of personal data pursuant to this Regulation. Recital 4: Balance Against Other Fundamental Rights The processing of personal data should

“including profiling based on those provisions.” Profiling is defined in Article 4(4) GDPR as a form of automated processing consisting of the use of personal

courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established. 4.   Where proceedings are brought against a decision of a supervisory authority

available to the data subject. Unlike other provisions such as Article 30(4) for the record of processing or Article 40(11) for the register of approved

in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(2). 4. The Commission shall, on an ongoing basis, monitor developments in third countries

'necessity' (such as food or clothing) at any age (Ryder v Wombell [1868] LR 4 Ex Ch 32 D 165). Furthermore, minors will be deemed as bound to that contract

137), in the context of the powers provided for in articles, 4 par. 3 para. a' and 10 par. 4 of Regulation of the Authority's Operation (Government Gazette

with the Nos. Nos.C/EX/4278-6/07.11.2019 (following the C/EX/4278-4/01.11.2019 document) and C/EX/4278-7/07.11.2019 (following the W/EX/4278-5/01.11.2019

documents C/EX/1342-2/10-04-2019 (for the complaints under (b) and (c)), C/EX/2332-1/14-05-2019 (for the complaint under (b) and (c)) and C/EX/2332-1/14-05-2019

HELLENIC REPUBLIC OF DATA PROTECTION Athens, 29-06-2020 No, for example: C/EX/4512/29-06-2020 FA IN NO 18/2020 (Department) The Personal Data Protection

examination of this complaint, the Authority sent the complainant the number one.C/EX/3409-1/07-06-2019 document requesting his views on the complainants, taking

adopt the following measures. 4(c) and 8 of Law No. 4624/19 in conjunction with Art. 2 f GDPR, the power to issue 4 an ex officio interim order for immediate

version ex tunc. This implies that IAB Europe commits itself to nullity of the Inspectorate's report on the basis of the language legislation. 4. The GBA

examination of this complaint, the Authority sent the complainant the number one. C/EX/4904-1/09-08-2019 document, in which he asked for his views on the complainants

et aux libertés, so-called law "Informatique et Libertés". Directive 95/46/ex was implemented by the law n° 2004-801 du 6 août 2004 which modified the law