Search results

basis: Art. 4 (1), (2), (7) and (8), Art. 5, Art. 44, Art. 46 (1) and (2) (c), Art. 51 (1), Art. 57 (1) (d) and (f), Art. 77 (1), Art. 80 (1) and Art. 93

particular in Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 24 Para. 1 sentence 1, Art. 25 Para. 1 and Para. 2 sentence 1, Art. 28 Para. 1 and Art. 89 Para. 1 sentence 2 (...). The

119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2, 18 Paragraph 1 and 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette

GDPR has been rectified under § 24(6) DSG by the information given in that reply. The data subject replied that § 24(6) DSG does not apply on violations of

, OJ No. L 119 of 04.05.2016, p. 1; Section 1 (1) and (2) and Section 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

(Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) regulates certain procedural elements as a lex specialis for the DSB, like the details of the complaints procedure in § 24 DSG (see below)

GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1, 18 Paragraph 1 and 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

Paragraph 4 DSG §24 Paragraph 1 DSG §24 Paragraph 5 DSG §24 Paragraph 6 GDPR Art 17 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 1st, 2019 to May 24th,

Section 24 (1) DSG only involves the processing of personal data contrary to the provisions of the GDPR, § 1 or Article 2 1st main part of the DSG can be

L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; Section 1 (1), Section 4 (1), Section 18 (1) and Section 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette

complaint hearing, the bB (OZ 23 to W245 2252208-1), the BF1 (OZ 24 to W245 2252208-1) and BF2 (OZ 25 to W245 2252208-1) Observations. In these observations, the

Zl. W258 2226305-1 / 5E, which the relevant Senate agrees: "According to § 24 Paragraph 1 DSG, which according to § 34 Paragraph 5 DSG is to be applied

right to data protection of § 1 DSG in the scope of § 9 para. 1 DSG is effectively undermined, since due to the in § 9 para. 1 DSG standardized exclusion of

No. L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1; §§ 1, § 18 paragraph 1 and § 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No.

violates the GDPR or Section 1 or Article 2, Chapter 1 DSG, whereby the complaint pursuant to Section 24 Para. 2 No. 1 DSG must contain the designation

B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §18 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 DSG §24 paragraph 8 GDPR Art51 Para GDPR Art57 Para.1 litf GDPR Art57 Para

Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) sets a penalty of €50,000 for, inter alia, (1) intentionally obtaining illegal access to personal

GDPR), OJ. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1, 18 para. 1 as well as 24 para. 1 and para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

tense provisions of § 24 Para. 1 DSG and Art. 77 Para. 1 GDPR - "violates" and not "has violated" - as well as § 24 Para. 5 DSG, according to which a legitimate

Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art15 GDPR Art4 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 WTBG 2017 §80 saying W101 2218962-1/10E IN THE

Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art17 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art58 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 saying W101 2213581-1/5E IN

No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2009 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from May

decision date 01/16/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 DSG §7 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1; Sections 1, 18 Para. 1 and 24 Para. 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1; Sections 1, 18 Para. 1 and 24 Para. 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

violations (Art. 24 Para. 1 No. 1 BayDSG), but also with regard to the protection of the public institution K.-garten against vandalism (Art. 24 Para. 1 No. 2 BayDSG)

GDPR), OJ L 119 of 4 May 2016, p. 1; Sections 18 (1) and 24 (1), (2) item 5, (4) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

Section 1 Para. 1 Z 1 BWG (deposit business), Section 1 Para. 1 Z 2 BWG (Giro business ), Section 1 Para. 1 Z 5 BWG (custody business) and Section 1 Para

2 Para. 2 Letter d, 4 No. 1, 6 Para. 1 Letter e, 79 Para. 1 BayDSG Art. 24 Para. 1 No. 1 and No. 2, 28 Guiding principles: 1. Video surveillance of a municipal

Administrative Court. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To dismiss the complaint 3.1.1. In accordance with Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR, the data subject has the right to request

according to To 1): € 1.200,00 To 2): € 300,00 To 3): € 300,00 . . . In total: € 1.800 To 1): 3 days To 2): 1 day To 3): 1 day ... In total: 5 days Ad 1): Art.

complainant. Specifically, the DSB cites Articles 5(1)(b) and (e), 9(2)(j), 89(1) GDPR and Section 7(1)(1) and (2)(1) GDPR. In particular, it follows from Article

standard AVG §38 B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art15 DSGVO Art15 Abs1 litc GDPR Art77 VwGVG §17 saying W214 2233132-1/13E I. ON BEHALF OF THE REPUBLIC

a legal point of view, it follows that D.1 The legal situation: D.1.1. infringement of Article 1(1) of the DSG 2000: A decision on this part of the complaint

secrecy (Section 1 (1) DSG) as follows The appeal is dismissed as unfounded. Legal basis: Article 51(1), Article 57(1)(f) and Article 77(1) of Regulation

basis: §§ 1 to 9 DSG 2000, BGBl. I No. 165/1999 as amended by BGBl. I No. 132/2015, as well as § 24 para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), BGBl. I No

108/19 § 18aF DSG MV, § 19aF DSG MV, § 20aF DSG MV, § 21aF DSG MV, § 22aF DSG MV, § 6 Abs 4 BDSG, § 37 EUV 2016/679, § 39 EUV 2016/679 tenor 1. The defendant's

the Data Protection Act (DSG), BGBl. 12(5)(a), Art. 55(1), Art. 56(1), Art. 57(1)(f), Art. 58(2)(c) and Art. 77 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (Data Protection

119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; § 1 paragraph 1 and 2, § 18 paragraph 1 and § 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette

Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2009 DSG Art. 2 § 4 today DSG Art. 2 § 4 valid from

7 DSG 2000 in conjunction with § 69 (5) DSG b) Art. 62 Para. 1 No. 4 DSG 4) a) Section 52 para. 2 no. 4 DSG 2000 in conjunction with § 69 (5) DSG b) Art

Paragraph 24(1) and (1) and (2) of the B-VG. 5 DSG as amended, with the provisos that part 1. of the ruling concerning the data protection complaint of 1 February

personal data concerning you violates the GDPR or § 1 or Article 2 1st main part. Section 24 (2) DSG generally specifies how a complaint to the authority

Law §1 para 1 Data Protection Law §1 para 2 Data Protection Law §9 para 1 Media Law §1 no 6 Media Law §1 no 7 Media Law §1 Z8 lit c Law of Parties §1 para

as amended, in conjunction with §§ 1, 3 Paragraph 1 and TP 1 Federal Administrative Fees Ordinance 1983, BGBl No. 24 as amended (BVwAbgV), the applicant

protection authority of 24.1.2020; e-mail of the Austrian data protection authority of 31.1.2020; e-mail of the plaintiff of 31.1.2020) will be returned

Section 1 (1) DSG can therefore not be assumed (RS0130870). 3.2.1. On the legality of the publication of the BF's data in the app Art 6 para 1 GDPR contains

Section 1(2) of the StVO. 2 DSG and Art. 8 para. 2 ECHR and justify such an intervention.§ 98a para. 2 first sentence StVO 1960 therefore violates § 1 DSG

"§ 25.1 sentence 1 of the Data Protection Act"]. In accordance with Article 58.2 lit. c DSGVO in conjunction with Article 24.5, second sentence, DSG, the

party. II The Federal Administrative Court considered 1. the following facts have been established: 1.1 Since 3 April 2001, the complainant has been operating

2 lit. g and Art. 77 Para. §§ 1 Para. 1 and Para. 2, 18 Para. 1 as well as 24 Para. 1 and Para. 5 Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

Legal basis: Art. 5 para. 1 lit. a to f, Art. 6 para. 1 lit. c, Art. 51 para. 1, Art. 57 para. 1 lit. f and Art. 77 para. 1 of the Regulation ( EU) 2016/679

from Art. 77 Paragraph 1 GDPR or Section 24 Paragraph 1 and 5 DSG and, furthermore, the principle according to Section 25 Paragraph 1 VStG the official access

(ExplanatoryRV 2111 BlgNR 24. GP 11; Bollenberger in KBB5 § 907a Rz 1). § 907a para. 1 sentence 1 ABGB is dispositive law (ExplanatoryRV 2111 BlgNR 24. GP 13; Kietaibl/Ladler

4 line 16, Art. 12 para. 1, Art. 14 para. 1 to para. 5, Art. 15, Art. 51 para. 1, Art. 57 para. 1 lit. f and Art. 77 para. 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

Gazette I no. 165/1999 as amended; Sections 1(1)(1) and (2), 2(1), 3(1)(1), (1a) and (2) and 4 of the Epidemics Act 1950 (hereinafter: EpiG), Federal Law Gazette

15 (3) sentence 1 of the GDPR (question 1). Is this also a specification or modification of the general right of access under Article 15(1) of the GDPR and

Österreichische Post AG Status: May 2018 1. who is fiJr responsible for handling your data? 1.1 Austrian Post AG, Rochusplatz 1, 1030 Vienna ("Post", "we", "us")

appeal is admissible; however, it is not justified. Legal assessment 1.1 Paragraph 1328a(1) of the ABGB states Anyone who unlawfully and culpably encroaches

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from

difference whether a breach of the GDPR or the § 1 DSG is objective. With regard to violations of § 1 DSG, there is no - 9 - express legal basis for the

the Data Protection Act (DSG), § 22 DSG, paragraph 8)., Practical commentary on the Data Protection Act (DSG), paragraph 22, DSG, paragraph 8 ). Since the

4.5.2016, p. 1; §§ 1 paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, 18 paragraph 1 as well as 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law

subject has objected to its processing pursuant to Article 21(1) of the GDPR (Article 17(1)(a), (c)(1) and (d) of the GDPR). A request for erasure would therefore

No. 24/2018 DSG Art. 2 § 36 valid from May 25th, 2018 to May 24th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art I No. 83/2013 DSG Art

No. 24/2018 DSG Art. 2 § 36 valid from May 25th, 2018 to May 24th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art I No. 83/2013 DSG Art

December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 3, 1930 to June 30, 1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid

achieves the objective.  Section 24 DSG Paragraphs 1 and 4 DSG: Complaint to the data protection authority Section 24. (1) Every data subject has the right

respondent is rejected. Legal basis: Section 1 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2, Section 22 Paragraph 4, Section 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 as well as Section 30

paragraph 2, item 6, DSG 2000 in conjunction with Article 69, paragraph 5, DSG and Article 62, paragraph 1, item 4, DSG. 2 item 4 DSG 2000 in conjunction

may include. 3.3.1.2. The relevant provisions of the DSG article 1 (constitutional provision) fundamental right to data protection § 1. (1) Everyone has,

accordance with Article 77, GDPR in conjunction with Paragraph 24, DSG on February 24, 2023. 1.4. The data protection authority then initiated a complaint

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

Section 7 (3) DSG was rejected in clause 1 and in clause 2 the information requested by the complainant ("request") was not granted. Regarding point 1, it was

success such that summary judgment ought to be granted pursuant to CPR 24.2. 10. CPR rule 24.2 provides that the court may give summary judgment against a claimant

paragraph 7, paragraph 3, DSG. Since neither the requirements of Section 7 Paragraph 1 DSG nor those of Section 7 Paragraph 2 Z 1 and Z 2 DSG are met, the planned

from 01/01/2014 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 51/2012 DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01

December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 3, 1930 to June 30, 1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

Section 24 (5) second sentence DSG that the desired elimination of the unlawful state determined by the data protection authority in clause 1. The present

Union in Case C-807/21 on the request of the Berlin Court of Appeal. Reason 1 1. The party involved has a business license as an "address publisher and direct

Sections 1 (1) and (2), 9 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act – DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Articles 4, 5, 6, 57(1)(f)

substantive requirements, e.g. of § 24 para. 2 - 6 DSG (cf. Schweiger in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 77 DSGVO, K8 (as of 1.12.2018, rdb.at)). The DPA also does

his rights under Article 1 GDPR or § 1 DSG, Art. 5 DSGVO or § 37 DSG, Art. 12, 22 and 41 DSGVO and Art. 34 DSGVO or § 56 DSG has been violated. The complainant

GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 04.05.2016, p. 1; Section 1 (1) and (2) and Section 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

with Art. 77 GDPR in conjunction with Section 24 DSG. Article 77, DSGVO in conjunction with Paragraph 24, DSG. In this context, the accused was specifically

enforced. Reason: 1.     The following facts relevant to the decision are established based on the evidence procedure carried out: 1.1. On April 24, 2023, Mr.

procedural requirements are also met. 3.3. To the point: 3.3.1. Legal position: 3.3.1.1. § Section 24 (1) and (4) of the FADP read as follows: Any data subject

Article 26.1 item 1 of the DSG, which is why the complainant had been granted the status of a public official under Article 26.3 of the DSG. cit. the complainant

OJ No. L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1; §§ 9, 18 paragraph 1 and 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from

Section 30 Paragraphs 1 and 2 DSGParagraph 30, paragraph one, and 2 DSG. According to § 30 para. 1 DSGParagraph 30, paragraph one, DSG, the data protection

(Data Protection Act - DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999, in the relevant version Federal Law Gazette I No. 24/2018 (DSG) contains - similar to

basis: Sections 1 (1), 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Art. 4 nos. 1 and 2, Art.

Para p. 1; Sections 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; §§ 2 Z 14, 17 Para. 1 and Para

GDPR), OJ. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1, 6, 18 para. 1 as well as 24 para. 1 and para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

16.12.2021 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 GDPR Art5 VwGVG §28 paragraph 3 sentence 2 saying W214 2242817-1/7E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court

applying the provisions of Section 1 (1) and (2) DSG, Art. 4 Z 7 Previous search term GDPR Next search term and Art. 6 Section 1 lit constitutionally guaranteed

of 4.5.2016, S 1; in conjunction with §§ 1 Paragraph 3 DSG, 4 Paragraph 6, 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette

conjunction with Section 24 DSG is that the person concerned receives the information to which he is entitled, the basis for points 1 and 2 in this regard

from January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2019 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 22/2018 B-VG Art. 130 valid from January 1, 2019 to May 24, 2018 last

Paragraph 1 Letter h in conjunction with Article 58 Paragraph 1 Letter b and Paragraph 2 Letter a GDPR in conjunction with Section 22 Paragraph 1 DSG, the mP

responsible cannot be derived from Art. 77 (1) GDPR or Section 24 (1) and (5) DSG and, moreover, from 25 para. 1 VStG, the principle of official expediency

Paragraph 1 lit. f, Art. 51 Paragraph 1, Art. 57 Paragraph 1 lit. Basic Regulation, hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; Sections 1 (1), 18 (1)

No. L 119 of 04.05.2016 p.1 and §§ 1 para. 1 and para. 3 line 2 as well as 24 para. 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

bases: Art. 4 Z 1 and Z 2, Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. c, Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 12 Para. 3, Art. 20 Para. 1, Art. 51 Para. 1, Article 57 Paragraph 1 Letter f and

Section 26, possibly in conjunction with Section 60 (1) Data Protection Act North Rhine-Westphalia (DSG NRW)”, the LDI turned to the District Court C. and

Art. 57 Para. 1 lit. h in conjunction with Art. 58 Para. 1 lit. b and Para. 2 lit. a GDPR in conjunction with Section 22 Paragraph 1 DSG was notified to

Savings book XXXX (OZ 1, S 351)  Savings book XXXX (OZ 1, S 351)  Savings book XXXX (OZ 1, S 351)  Savings book XXXX (OZ 1, S 351) 1.3. The MB answered

LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January 2019,

to the procedure. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To dismiss the complaint 3.1.1.1. According to Art. 130 Para. 1 Z 1 B-VG, the administrative courts recognize

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

section 27(1) of the Medical Practitioners Act. There was no interest in secrecy in this data and it was generally available under section 1(1) of the Data

of Section 1 or Article 2 1st main item. As can be seen from Section 1 of the DPA (in accordance with Art. 1 (EU) 2016/679), OJ L 2016/119, 1 (hereinafter:

follows from Articles 15(3)(1), 12(5)(1) GDPR in conjunction with § 5(8)(1) of the Data Protection Act of North Rhine-Westphalia (DSG NRW). The court first finds

[18. Lfg] Art 85 DSGVO Rz 10). [42] 2.5. Section 9 (1) DSG (as amended by Federal Law Gazette I 2018/24) exempts the processing of personal data by media

with Section 56 (1) JAG NRW therefore constitutes an opposite to Section 5 (8) sentence 1 DSG NRW in conjunction with Art.m. Section 56 (1) of the JAG NRW

offenses after: Ad. I.:Ad. Roman one.: Art. 5 (1) lit. a, b and c and Art. 6 (1) lit. f in conjunction with Art. 83 (1) and (5) lit. a GDPR OJ L 2016/119, p ,

.2016 p. 1; Sections 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Section 3b (1) of the Experts

Court considered: Legal assessment: Regarding A) According to Section 1 (1) sentence 1 DSG, everyone is entitled to confidentiality of personal data concerning

II.3.1. Regarding point A) – rejection of the complaint: Roman II.3.1. Regarding point A) – rejection of the complaint: II.3.1.1.Roman II.3.1.1. The procedure

obligation to do so can be derived. 3. Legal assessment: Section 1 Paragraph 1 and 2 DSG read: Ҥ 1. (1) Everyone has, especially with regard to respect for their

Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. c, Art. 6, Art. 12 Para. 3, Art. 51 Para. 1, Art. 57 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 58 Para. 2 lit. d and f and Art. 77 Para. 1 of Regulation

05/04/2016 p. 1; Sections 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Art. 31 Para. 1 and Art

are processed at all (Art 15(1)(1) GDPR) or whether information on specific processed data is requested (Art 15(1)(2) GDPR). 1.2 The competent panel of experts

following legal bases: Sections 1(1) and (2) and Section 24(1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No 165/1999

interpretation of Section 1 of the GDPR in conformity with EU law is required (Lachmayer in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 1 DSGVO Rz 70 (as of 1.12.2018, rdb.at)), which

conclusion based on the provisions of Section 1 (1). DSG as well as Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. c and Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f DSGVO, the processing is based on Legitimate

self-determination from Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 1(1) GG, the negative freedom of belief from Article 4(1) GG and the duty of the state comment

pursuant to Article 57 (1) (h) in conjunction with Article 58 (1) (b) and (2) (a) of the GDPR in conjunction with Section 22 (1) of the Data Protection

confidentiality pursuant to section 1 and sections 8 as well as 62 para. 1 line 1 of the Data Protection Act (DSG) by Österreichische Post AG (the co-participating

search term), OJ No. L 119 of 4 May 2016 p. 1; Sections 1, 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as

without consulting her. II. the Federal Administrative Court considered: 1. findings: 1.1 The complainant operates a property management company which has been

to exercise their rights under Sections 24 to 27 DSG before the data protection authority and the BVwG. The 1st MB is a company based in XXXX and has the

the complaint. 3. Legal assessment: To A): 3.1. Regarding point I.3.1. At the point of the roman one. 3.1.1. In the present case, the complainant, in his

the meaning of § 35 sentence 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act - VwVfG - (see VG Mainz, judgment of 16 January 2020 - 1 K 129/19.MZ - juris, marginal

to injunctive relief from § 29 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 2 BDSG old version, but from § 29 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 1 BDSG old version, although the "basic

section 1 para. 1 of the Data Protection Act (right to confidentiality). The MB XXXX is ordered to delete the content mentioned under point 1 from its

Possibility of a judicial remedy under Article 78.” § 24 paragraphs 1 and 5 DSG read: - 25 - "Article 24. (1) Every data subject has the right to lodge a complaint

one its tenants. On 1 September 2020, one of the Defendant's other customers ["the Third Party"] requested a rent statement. Around 1.22pm, one of the Defendant's

Paragraph 1 lit. a. Article 6 (1) (a), Article 7 (1) and (2), Article 12 (1), Article 13 (1) (c), Article 57 (1) (a) and (h), Article 58 (1) (c) . 1 b and

pursuant to Article 1(2), last sentence, DSG in conjunction with Art. 5(1)(c) DSGVO and thus a violation of the right to secrecy. Article 5(1)(c) of the GDPR

with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO had

hereinafter: GDPR) , OJ No. L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1; §§ 1, 18 paragraph 1 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended

78.". Section 1 and Section 24 (1) and (5) of the FADP read: "Article 1 (Constitutional provision) Fundamental right to data protection (1) Everyone has

Administrative Court Decision date 08/26/2021 Business number W274 2242363-1 Saying W274 2242363-1 / 4E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative Court

W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24.03.2021, W214

Evidence assessment: 2.1. The statements on point 1.1. arise from the harmless administrative records. 2.2.1.The statement on point 1.2.1.is based on the comprehensible

Section 50 (1) BMG, Section 49 BWahlG, Section 6 (1) S 1e EUV 2016/679, Section 17 HKG ND, Section 85a HKG ND, Section 85a (1) S 1 HKG ND, Section 5 (1) S 2 DSG

personal data pursuant to Article 4(1) of the Regulation, citing Section 1(1) of the Data Protection Act and Article 4(1) of the Regulation. With regard to

with Section 42 (1) Alt. 1 VwGO (see judgments the Chamber of March 12, 2021 - VG 1 K 389/18 and of June 13, 2022 - VG 1 K 365/20 and - VG 1 K 19/22; each

§ 166 para. 1 p. 1 ZPO § 114 para. 1 p. 1, § 121 para. 1 StVZO § 31a paragraph 1 p. 1, paragraph 3 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 Art. 5 para. 1 lit. d, Art

offense (s) after: Article 5 (1) (a), Article 9 (1) and (2) in conjunction with Article 83 (1) and (5) (a) GDPR, OJ L 2016/119, 1 as amended L 2016/314 , 72

justified. [12] A. Deletion request and storage period (Art 5 Para 1 lit c and lit e GDPR) [13] 1.1. According to the findings, the defendant records personal

Federal Law Gazette I No. 22/2018 B-VG Art. 133 valid from August 1, 2014 to May 24, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 164/2013 B-VG Art by

procedure is based on Sections 47 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1, 52 Paragraph 1, 53 Paragraph 2 No. 1 GKG. Based on No. 1.5, 18.12 of the Catalog of Values in Dispute

unlawful and does not violate the plaintiff's rights, § 113.1 sentence 1 VwGO. Paragraph20 (1) The contested order is authorised by Article 58(2)(c) in conjunction

pursuant to § 1.5 sentence 1 BDSG in conjunction with Art. 4.1 lit. A of Directive 95/46/EC, because in a Directive-compliant interpretation of § 1.5 sentence

sentence 1 no. 2 IFG Berlin, their disclosure should be opposed by interests worthy of protection. 24 The decision on costs is based on Section 154(1) of the

the applicant to 2), in accordance with sections 1626 (1), 1629 (1) sentence 1 and sentence 2 ms. 1 BGB as its legal representative. 13 To the extent permitted

Para. 1 Sentence 1 DS-GVO, the processing of personal data is only lawful if at least one of the conditions specified in Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 Letters

protection law, which were created pursuant to Section 1 (1) sentence 1 of the Federal Data Protection Act (BbgDSG) to implement the Basic Data Protection Regulation

whether a test within the meaning of Section 4 (1) sentence 1 in conjunction with Section 3 (5) sentence 1 No. 1, 2 16. BayIfSMV was made and whether it is

§ 29 paragraph 1 sentence 1 no. 1 BDSG a.F. The principles developed can be referred to within the framework of Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 letter f DS-GVO

of Art. 6 Para. 1 DS-GVO is fulfilled. (1) The disputed data processing by the plaintiff was lawful according to Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 Letter f DS-GVO

4 allow No. 1 as an exception; § 3 paragraph 1 sentence 2 and 3 applies accordingly. 15 (2) 1para. 1 applies accordingly if access also 16 1. Pupils according

GG Art. 1 Para. 1 GG Art. 2 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1 GG Art. 3 Para. 1 GG Art. 13 Para. 7 GDPR Art. 4 GDPR Art. 5 Para. 1 GDPR Art. 6 Para. 1, Para.

rejection according to Art. 8 Paragraph 1 Clause 1 No. 1 BayUIG. 26 According to Art. 8 Para. 1 Clause 1 No. 1 BayUIG, an application must be rejected

self-determination from Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with 1 sec. 1 GG; however, this interference is constitutionally justified. (1) The publication of the remuneration

basis in Article 19 Paragraph 6 Clause 1 BayDSG in conjunction with Article 1, Article 2, Article 6 Paragraph 1 Clauses 2 and 3, Paragraph 2 KG and is

§ Section 20(5) sentence 1 no. 2 BDSG is lex specialis to section 78(1) no. 1 VwGO (cf. BeckOK DatenschutzR/Mundil, 34th ed. 1 February 2020 marginal no