Search results

margin number 119 (NOMOS 2019). Roßnagel, in Simitis, Hornung, Spieker, Datenschutzrecht, Article 5 GDPR, margin number 120 (NOMOS 2019). Roßnagel, in Simitis

CJEU, C‑673/17, Planet49, 1 October 2019, margin number 44, 52 (available here). EUCJ, C‑673/17, Planet49, 1 October 2019, margin numbers 44, 52 (available

36 (Nomos 2019). Polenz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 58 GDPR, margin numbers 38 and 39 (Nomos 2019). Boehm, in

'Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default', 20 October 2020 (Version 2.0), pp. 8-9 (available here). EDPB, 'Guidelines 4/2019 on Article

156(3)(a) of the Codice). On 4 April 2019 the DPA adopted two different administrative regulations. The Regolamento n. 1/2019 ("Regolamento concernente le procedure

37 (C.H. Beck 2019). Hansen, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 32 GDPR, margin number 39 (C.H. Beck 2019). Hansen, in

margin number 21, (NOMOS 2019). Roßnagel, in Simitis, Hornung, Spieker, Datenschutzrecht, Article 4 2 GDPR, margin number 20 (NOMOS 2019). Roßnagel, in Simitis

3rd Edition 2019). Petri, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 9 GDPR, margin number 22 (C.H. Beck 2019). Petri, in Simitis

annual report of the DPA for 2019 can be consulted at: https://www.autoriteprotectiondonnees.be/publications/rapport-annuel-2019.pdf (FR) and at https://www

Opinion 8/2019 on the competence of a supervisory authority in case of a change in circumstances relating to the main or single establishment, 9 July 2019, p

Beck 2019, 3rd edition). Boehm, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 83 GDPR, margin number 20 (C.H. Beck 2019, 1st edition)

number 40 (Nomos 2019). Polenz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 57 GDPR, margin number 41 (Nomos 2019). Ziebarth, in

‘Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes of Conduct and Monitoring Bodies under Regulation 2016/679’, 4 June 2019 (Version 2.0), p. 8 (available here). Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes

budget of €61m in 2019, according to a Brave study. The ICO had 680 staff in 2019, far outnumbering all other DPAs in Europe. In the year 2019/2020, the ICO

and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Greece, the Greek Data Protection Act 2019, the ePrivacy Directive implementation law and other provisions regarding

appropriate bodies. EDPB, ‘Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes of Conduct and Monitoring Bodies under Regulation 2016/679’, 4 June 2019 (Version 2.0), p. 5 (available here)

236.00 in 2019. It is funded by the Republic of Slovenia. All fines and fees go to the federal budget, not into the budget of the IC. In 2019 the IC had

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 12 GDPR, margin number 13 (C.H. Beck 2019). Under Article 12(1), controllers must provide any information to the data

November 2019 (Version 2.1), p. 4 (available here). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3)’, 12 November 2019 (Version

Fachverlag 2019, 3rd edition). Boehm in Simitis. Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 80 GDPR, margin number 11 (C.H. Beck 2019). See for

margin number 5 (NOMOS 2019). Polenz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Article 60 GDPR, margin number 5 (NOMOS 2019). Dix, in Kühling, Buchner

3 Mio in 2019. It is funded by the Republic of Austria. All fines and fees go to the federal budget, not into the budget of the DSB. In 2019 the DSB had

p. 3 (available here). Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 of 23 January 2019 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 81 GDPR, margin number 18 (C.H. Beck 2019); Kreße in Sydow, Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Article 81 GDPR

(Article 3)’, 12 November 2019 (Version 2.1), p. 27-28 (available here). Datenschutzbehörde, 7 March 2019, DSB-D130.033/0003-DSB/2019 (available here).

in Taeger, Gabel, DSGVO BDSG, Article 21 GDPR, margin number 13 (C.H. Beck 2019, 3rd Edition); Schulz, in Gola, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 21 GDPR

EDPB jointly, where such proposals are of particular importance. On 13 May 2019, the Commission submitted its first request for a joint opinion of this kind

margin number 6 (NOMOS 2019). Polenz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Article 53 GDPR, margin number 6 (NOMOS 2019). For more on the SAs'

(Datatilsynet's annual report 2021): 2021: NOK 67 845 000 2020: NOK 66 703 000 2019: NOK 57 672 000 2018: NOK 54 411 000 The DPA had 72 employees as per 31 December

criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation’, 4 June 2019 (Version 3.0), p. 8 (available here). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 1/2018 on certification

numbers 12-14 (NOMOS 2019). Polenz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 52 GDPR, margin number 15 (Nomos 2019). Boehm, in Kühling

on the annual reports): 2022: €4,450,000 2021: €4,351,000 2020: €3,700,000 2019: €3,862,000 2018: €2,372,000 In the end of 2022, the Office had 54 personnel

Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 1 (Beck 2019) (accessed 2 September 2021). See Recital 10 See Recital 14 CJEU in C-398/15

and Beyond, in International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27 (2019), p. 102. Recital 71 GDPR. Mendoza, Bygrave, The Right not to be Subject

Diário da República n.º 194/2004, Série I-A de 2004-08-18, altered by Law 58/2019, of 8 of August (Portuguese Data Protection Law, supplementing the GDPR)

law "informatique et Libertés" has to be read jointly with the Decree n° 2019-536 of May 29. According to Article 8(I)(2)(d) of the loi "Informatique et

criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation’, 4 June 2019 (Version 3.0), pp. 19-20 (available here). European Commission, ‘Data Protection

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 28 GDPR, margin number 70 (C.H. Beck 2019). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in

gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 17 GDPR, margin number 6 (C.H. Beck 2019). Along the same line, Herbst, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article

Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 58 GDPR, margin number 6 (Nomos 2019). Hijmans, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation

planned audits in intervals of six months. The focus of the last half of 2019 was controllers; daily surveillance, data protection in relation to employment

gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 19 GDPR, margin number 8 (C.H. Beck 2019). Kamann, Braun in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article

this section! Memoria 2019: https://www.avpd.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/publicaciones_avpd/es_def/adjuntos/memoria_avpd-2019_web-es.pdf

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 39 GDPR, margin numbers 7-15 (C.H. Beck 2019). WP29, ‘Guidelines on Data Protection Officers (‘DPO’s)’, 16/EN WP 243 rev

Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 13 June 2019 (available here), and CJEU, C-142/18, Skype Communications SRL, 5 June 2019 (available here). Kühling, Raab, in

Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Article 68 GDPR, margin number 5 (C.H. Beck 2019, 1st edition). Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation

Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 54 GDPR, margin number 8 (Nomos 2019). Dissenting views can be found in Hijmans, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The

of personal data in Slovakia from 25 May 2018 to 24 May 2019 (‘The Report’) in September 2019. The Report is issued annually and is subject to a debate

number 7 (C.H. Beck 2019, 1st ed.) Polenz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Article 61 GDPR, margin number 7 (Beck 2019, 1st ed.), who clarifies

369 11 fines in 2020, the lowest being €200 and highest €65,000 9 fines in 2019, the lowest being €200 and highest €150,000 12 fines in 2018, the lowest

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 30 GDPR, margin number 14 (C.H. Beck 2019). Hartung, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 30, margin number 17

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 34 GDPR, margin numbers 8-9 (C.H. Beck 2019). To this extent, the EDPB outlines three distinct categories of personal

(C.H. Beck 2019). Schantz, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 46 GDPR, margin number 10 (C.H. Beck 2019). This applies

Hornung, Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Article 17 GDPR, margin numbers 5 (NOMOS 2019). See below commentary on paragraph 2, and Article 19 GDPR. Nolte, Werkmeister

+358-18-25-550 Procedural Law: Landskapslag (2019:9) om dataskydd inom landskaps- och kommunalförvaltningen Landskapslag (2019:74) om tillämpning på Åland av riksförfattningar

number 12 (C.H. Beck 2019, 3th Edition). Reibach, in Taeger, Gabel, DSGVO BDSG, Article 36 GDPR, margin number 12 (C.H. Beck 2019, 3th Edition). Jandt

Gabel, DSGVO – BDSG, Article 79 GDPR, margin number 8 (Deutscher Fachverlag 2019 3rd edition); Leupold, Schrems in Knyrim, Der Datkomm, Article 79 GDPR, margin

gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 14 GDPR, margin number 1 (C.H. Beck 2019). Zanfir-Fortuna, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection

gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 88 GDPR, margin number 25 (1st edn. 2019, Beck). The German GDPR uses the term ‘Kollektivvereinbarungen’, while the

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 26 GDPR, margin number 12 (C.H. Beck 2019). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in

Decisions: Category:Commissioner (Cyprus) Head Count: n/a Budget: 503.855 Euro (2019)

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 78 GDPR, margin numbers 3 and 7 (C.H. Beck 2019). The Author also points out that "The right to an effective remedy is inspired

list of such reprimands on the AP website does show reprimands going back to 2019 which had not been published before under the policy to publish whole decisions

Decisions: Category:NAIH (Hungary) Head Count: 114 Budget: 1,131 billion HUF in 2019 (3,429 million EUR)

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 35 GDPR, margin number 36 (C.H. Beck 2019). WP29, ‘Guidelines on Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and determining

of Play - IMI for GDPR purposes, 27 June 2018 (available here). See EDPB, 2019 Annual Report, Section 4.3.1 (available here). European Commission, 16 May

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 20 GDPR, margin number 18 (C.H. Beck 2019). European Commission, 'A Europe fit for the digital age' (available here)

Wolff, Brink, DS-GVO, Article 69 GDPR, margin numbers 4-6 (C.H. C.H. Beck 2019, 35th edition) Dix in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 69 GDPR, margin

, First Chamber Ruling, Case 1 BvR 276/17 (in DE), 6 November 2019. ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rs20191106.1bvr027617 Bundesverfassungsgericht, Second Senate Judgment

gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 24 GDPR, margin number 9 (C.H. Beck 2019). The attribution of the various conditions to these criteria is not practised

gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 73 GDPR, margin number 3 (C.H. Beck 2019, 1st edition). Nguyen, in Gola, DS-GVO, Article 73 GDPR, margin number 2

- 20/01868 (PVN-2020-15) (Available here). Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2019/AR/1006 (available here). HBDI (Hesse) - 62334 (available here). Worms, in

350 (Oxford University Press 2020). CJEU, C‑673/17, Planet49, 1 October 2019, margin number 58-60 (available here) Heckmann, Paschke, in Ehmann, Selmayr

EU/European Economic Area. By the end of 2018, the EDPS reaches 100 employees. In 2019, the EDPS starts supervising Eurojust - an EU agency in charge of combating

provide an overview over which sectors and issues will be prioritized. For 2019-2020 this overview can be found here (in SE). You can help us filling this

gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 77 GDPR, margin number 6 (C.H. Beck 2019). Bergt, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 77 GDPR, margin number

Datenschutzrechtliche Schadensersatzansprüche im Musterfeststellungsverfahre, in NJW, 72 (2019) p.3415; Similar opinion by Wybitul/Haß/Albrecht, Abwehr von Schadensersatzansprüchen

notion de responsable conjoint du traitement”, in Journal de Droit Européen, 2019/2, pp. 67-69. Act on the Protection on Personal Data of 29 August 1997, Journal

in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nature Communications 10 (2019). Wiese Svanberg, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 33 GDPR, margin number 18 (C.H. Beck 2019). EDPB, Guidelines 9/2022 on personal data breach notification under GDPR

Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 15 GDPR, margin number 23 (C.H. Beck 2019). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 01/2022 on data subject rights - Right of access’, 28

administrative bodies of a collegial nature; Considering the decree n o 2019-536 of May 29, 2019 taken for the application of the law n o 78-17 of January 6, 1978

March 4, 2019, the Company filed written comments on the report. The rapporteur replied to these observations on March 15, 2019. On April 2, 2019, the company

Case Number/Name: C-673/17 Planet49 European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:801 Reference from: BGH (Germany) Language: 24 EU Languages Original Source:

01-00001582885-0011-0033-01-01-� L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels -2019/AR/1600- p. 12 the decision 06/2019 of 17 September 2019 of the Chamber of Disputes of the Destroy the

details. Direct marketing and data broking On 23 October 2019, GZ: DSB-D550.148/0017-DSB/2019, the DSB imposed a fine of € 18,000,000.00 on Österreichische

Data Protection Authority was established. From 29.8.2019 this Law was repealed by Law 4624/2019, which provides for the implementing measures of the GDPR

on 10/26/2018, 01/18/2019, 02/22/2019, 07/22/2019, 10/10/2019 and 05/24/2019. b. The letter received from EQUIFAX, dated 10/21/2019, in which it responds

with the APD respectively on May 20, 2019 (DOS- 2019-02837), June 4, 2019 (DOS-2019-03124), July 2, 2019 (DOS-2019-03668), and 26 November 2020 (this complaint

Competition (UWG) Paragraph 15(1) German Law on Telemedia (TMG) Decided: 29.07.2019 Parties: Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV, Case Number/Name:

https://www.lawspot.gr/nomikes-plirofories/nomothesia/n-4624-2019/arthro-15-nomos-4624-2019-ereynitikes-kai-diorthotikes This provision notes: '8. Where

Decided: 24.09.2019 Parties: CNIL Google LLC Case Number/Name: C-136/17 Google LLC vs CNIL European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:773 Reference from:

10, 2018. By the Act of amendments to sectoral regulations of February 21, 2019. - changes were made to over 160 acts regulating various sectors and areas

complaint of XXXX against the decision of the data protection authority of XXXX 2019, XXXX , regarding the provision of a copy of the processed personal data

than one million kroner from 2018 to 2019. From a small profit in the operating profit for 2018, the accounts in 2019 showed a deficit of more than 363,000

1 October 2019, Mr. Van Graafeiland acted on behalf of the State. 1.5. Contrary to her letter of 1 October 2019, by letter of 13 November 2019, Mr. Van

protection authority of 11 February 2019, GZ DSB-D213.747/0002-DSB/2019, after an oral hearing on 22 November 2019 and 30 October 2020, in a closed session

obtained a self-disclosure from the defendant dated 21 October 2019. By letter dated 27 November 2019 (Annex K4), his counsel requested the defendant to delete

number to the citizens. In Portugal the GDPR is implemented by the Lei n.º 58/2019. In Portugal the Age of consent is 13 years old. You can help us fill this

or PDPA, promulgated with State Gazette No. 17/26.02.2019 and entered into force on 2nd March 2019. The Bulgarian government has also passed numerous laws

percentage disclosed Denmark 2019-2020: 30 June 2019 Emergency 2 / 50%. Other legal 29 / 52%. Preservation 8 / 45%. 31 December 2019 Emergency 3 / 0%. Other

notification requirements in the case of a personal data breach, 2019-441-1581 and 2019-441-1578. Both cases regarded insufficient access controls on a

plaintiff was set at 28 June 2019, and for submissions in response from the defendant at 29 July 2019. 3/9-On 18 June 2019, the defendant requested a copy

LOPDGDD). On April 4, 2019, the claim is transferred to EQUIFAX. On April 24, 2019, this Agency received, under registration number 021042/2019, a letter of allegations

the electoral census for delivery to political parties (date 06/03/2019).On 17/05/2019 an envelope with a miniature name and address, with the letterhead

dated August 1, 2019 (in the version of the correction of deficiencies dated September 10, 2019), the complainant alleged that on July 2, 2019, he requested

this section! In Czech Republic the GDPR is implemented by the Zákon č. 110/2019. You can help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! You

Liberties Deliberation No. SAN-2019-010 of November 21, 2019 Deliberation of the restricted formation n°SAN-2019-010 of November 21, 2019 concerning the company

Office for Personal Data Protection in the letter of [...] June 2019, No. ZSPU.421.3.2019, constituting the notice of initiation of the procedure. Having

details. Product No.: PS/00188/2019 938-0419 DECISION ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS In the sanctioning procedure PS/00188/2019, instructed by the Spanish Data

C/EX/4278-6/07.11.2019 (following the C/EX/4278-4/01.11.2019 document) and C/EX/4278-7/07.11.2019 (following the W/EX/4278-5/01.11.2019 document) documents

Protection Board's interpretation guidelines issued on 2 December 2019 Guidelines 5/2019 on the criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines

] January 2019, the Company's letter of [...] February 2019, as well as reports of violations made by the Company). Order of [...] August 2019. The President

Decision 11-2019 of November 25, 2019; Decision 10-2019 of November 25, 2019; Decision 04/2019 of May 28, 2019 and Decision 30/2020 of November 8, 2019; Decision

Deliberation SAN-2019-001 of 21 January 2019 Print National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties Deliberation No. SAN-2019-001 of January

("ePrivacy Directive") (see Opinion 5/2019 on the interaction between the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR of March 12, 2019). The data protection authority also

this section! In Belgium the GDPR is implemented by the Data Protection Act (2019). You can help us fill this section! The age of consent in Belgium is 13

The Personal Data Act (2018) GDPR A6 Proceedings Oslo District Court TOSLO-2019-98312 - Borgarting Court of Appeal LB-2020-18230 - Supreme Court HR-2021-2403-A

C/EIS/1342/19-01-2019, as completed by document No. C/EIS/2184/21-03-2019, according to which his telephone number ... received on ...2019 at ...2019 and time

from 23.07.2019 (and ref. Complaint C/ΕΙΣ/5141/23.07.2019) Complaint, as supplemented by 09.10.2019 (and ref. no. Out C/ΕΙΣ/6110/10.09.2019) an application

letter dated 17 April 2019, and asked questions to OLVG. These questions were answered by a letter dated 3 May 2019. On 22 May 2019, five inspectors from

of 11/12/2019 appears as closed, and the orders dated 11/14/2019 appear cancelled. The SIM change on 11/12/2019 was made (...) and on 11/14/2019 via (..

true that the e-mail message of 20 March 2019, unlike, for example, the letters of 5 September and 10 December 2019, does not explicitly state that it concerns

investigating. In a letter dated April 1, 2019 (page 10 of the file), which the plaintiff received on April 2, 2019, the defendant terminated the employment

to achieve these goals (2019. judgment of 24 September GC et al. GC et al. [Delete links to special data], C‑136/17, EU:C:2019:773, paragraph 74), and

College. Thus, the complainant underlined that, under Article 55 of Law 4629/2019, the College had the legal responsibility, as a data processor, to inform

particular its articles 20 and following; Considering the decree n o 2019-536 of May 29, 2019 taken for the application of the law n o 78-17 of January 6, 1978

C/EX/7597/05-11-2019, the complainant was invited to a hearing at the meeting of the Authority’s Section on 04-12-2019.After number one.C/ES/8386/03-12-2019 of the

C/EX/6013-1/03-10-2019 document in which it requested its views on the complainants. The company complained responded by no. C/ES/7002/15-10-2019 document in

dataprotection.ie/sites/default/files/uploads/2018-12/DPC_ChildrensRights_2019_English.pdf https://www.dataprotection.ie/en/legal/data-protection-legislation

Considering the decisions n ^o 2019-081C of April 24, 2019 and n ^o 2019-102C of June 6, 2019 of the President of the National Commission

complainant indicates that she received this formal notice on March 1 2019. 8. On March 3, 2019, the complainant wrote to the second respondent to receive explanations

C/ΕΞ/8101/22-11-2019 Hearing, in relation to the complaint.The complainant was also informed of the meeting by letter ref.C/ΕΞ/8139/25-11-2019 of the Authority

February 2019, A requested that the blocking of her user on the job server and forwarding of her e-mail to the employer cease. On 27 February 2019, the employer

no. No. C/EX/7600/05-11-2019 document complained to a hearing at the meeting of the Department of the Authority on 04-12-2019, during which the above-mentioned

the promotion of the defendant's candidacy at the parliament elections of 2019 violated Article 13 of the ePrivacy Directive. The DPA received two complaints

1 October 2019, Mr. Van Graafeiland acted on behalf of the State. 1.5. Contrary to her letter of 1 October 2019, by letter of 13 November 2019, Mr. Van

implemented in May 2019. The breach of Article 39.1.a) of the GDPR therefore lasted for at least between May 25, 2018 and May 2019. __________________

February 2019 - reference is made to the facts of the challenged decision (pp. 251 et seq. of the German version). In its ruling of March 29, 2019, the Regional

entry into this Agency on 02/13/2019 (a few days after that admission for processing on 02/01/2019), 05/23/2019 and 08/27/2019; and admitted for processing

last BGH, judgment v. v. 2.7.2019 - VI ZR 494/17, NJW 2019, 453; see also Senate, judgment of 7.6.2018 - 15 U 127/17 BeckRS 2019, 7664). The mere fact that

Dispute Chamber Interim decision 26/2021 of 23 February 2021 File no. : DOS-2019-01377 Subject: Language of the procedure - complaint against IAB Europe The

administrative court (VwGH January 14, 2020, Fr 2019/12/0042 with reference to VwGH July 2, 2019, Fr 2019/12/ 0028; 25.5.2016, Fri 2015/11/0007). Even if

reiterated on...2019 The Centre refused to accede to the Centre for the same reasons and a subsequent request from the applicant on...2019, in which it also

Protection Board, Guidelines, Guidelines 3/2019 on processing of personal data through video devices, 10.07.2019, p. 21ff, available online at https://edpb

December 2017). 6. On 11 September 2019, a copy of the file will be sent to the defendant. 7. on 26 September 2019, the Disputes Chamber will receive the

engaged by the Applicant as an employee, beginning in 2019. 4. On November 26, 2019 and December 14, 2019, Mr. X and shareholder company W exchange letters

intersubjective communication. TEXT Judgment of the Constitutional Court No. 464/2019 Summary: Declares the rule contained in article 3 of Organic Law no. 4/2017

the consistent and homogeneous application of these provisions. On 26 April 2019, a shareholder of a Hungarian public limited company attended its general

submitted her request on May 13, 2019 and only received an answer on November 21, 2019 (probably meaning: November 27, 2019). In addition, the statements

for a statement, which was sent on 8 October 2019. The request was answered in statement dated 21 October 2019. Attached were the company's routines for camera

to conclude. Google's submissions were received on 30 September 2019. On 15 October 2019, the the Registry of the Litigation Chamber, in the absence of

paragraph 81, as well as of 24 September 2019, GC etc. (Delete links to sensitive data), C-136/17, EU:C:2019:773, paragraph 66]. 63. In particular, when

5.2020 - Ro 2019/04/0229, ZD 2020, 463; BVwG, Spruch vom 19. August 2019 - W211 2217629-1/10E Rn. 29 et seq.; Spruch vom 23. Oktober 2019 - W258 2227269-1/114E

found out about the registration on December 1, 2019. 11With a letter from a lawyer dated December 4th, 2019, the defendant was asked to revoke the illegal

ri-2019.pdf. 236Decision of the General Secretariat No. 01/2019 of 16 January 2019, para. 6.8). 237Decision of the General Secretariat No. 01/2019 of 16

Norwegian original for more details. Decision of the Privacy Board 21 January 2019 (Mari Bø Haugstad, Bjørnar Borvik, Line Coll, Hans Marius Graasvold, Gisle

particular its articles 20 and following; Having regard to decree no. 2019-536 of May 29, 2019 taken for the application of law no. 78-17 of January 6, 1978 relating

C-399/11, EU:C:2013:107, para. 60; judgment of 29 July 2019, Pelham and others, C-476/17, EU:C:2019:624, para. 80 et seq.) This is to be taken into account

with IMI number 69346 and dated June 17, 2019. One month is given at authorities to manifest.  On August 24, 2019: the data protection control authority

4 September 2019, he resigned with effect from 30 September 2019. The applicant’s requests to the SRB3        By an email of 29 September 2019, the applicant

financing applications. In the contested decision of XXXX 2019, delivered electronically on XXXX 2019, the data protection complaint was dismissed as unfounded

Greek Constitution Article 1(g) Law 4629/2019 Article 9 Law 4629/2019 Article 15 Law 4629/2019 Article 33 Law 4629/2019 Type: Complaint Outcome: Other Outcome

as a unilateral body in accordance with Articles 17 par. 1 of Law No. 4624/2019 (Government Gazette A' 137), within the framework of the powers provided

religious or non-religious beliefs. The HDPA referred to its own past Decision 28/2019, where it held that the disclosure of the fact that a student is not Orthodox

The 2011 ruling included a ban on the right to run a business, however in 2019 a court removed this ban so that the data subject could become a general

regard Decisions APD 25/2022, sc. 1, 26/2019, sc. 7 and APD 43/2019, sc. 6. 6 See in particular, decision 44/2019 of the Authority, s. 17, and 54/2021, s

Authority has taken into account the following: Letter ref. C/ΕΙΣ/5370/06-08-2019 to the Authority, A denounces the PPC for failure to comply with its right

linked to their phone number by anyone in possession of such a number. In 2019, unknown “third parties” automatically combined telephone numbers and matched

decisions, which it handed over to credit information companies as of 5 November 2019 as default information based on final judgments. Binsnode and the registrar

decisions, which it handed over to credit information companies as of 5 November 2019 as default information based on final judgments. Binsnode and the registrar

decisions, which it handed over to credit information companies as of 5 November 2019 as default information based on final judgments. Binsnode and the registrar

penalty order on the grounds that, in the period from 25 May 2018 to 5 March 2019, the controller concerned deliberately omitted to take the necessary measures

same applies to the notice of increase on July 1, 2019 in tariff PT3. The notification letter from May 2019 states es: "Why is the contribution increasing

them to allow said personnel to opt out of being listed and reviewed. In 2019, the decision was overturned by the Privacy Appeals Board, was then taken

in particular Articles 20 et seq; Having regard to Decree No. 2019-536 of 29 May 2019 taken for the application of Law No. 78-17 of 6 January 1978 relating

participants will be kept in accordance with the current Greek legislation, Law 4624/2019 on the Personal Data Protection Authority and the General Regulation on Personal

issued from 1 March 2015 to 3 March 2019: family name, parents' names, 3) for identity cards issued after 4 March 2019: nationality, identity card number

inspection"), informing data subjects Registrar Medical clinic On 23 October 2019, a complaint regarding the registered person's right of inspection was initiated

under the terms the provisions of paragraph 3 of article 39 of Law no. 58/2019, of 8 August; iv. The Deliberation Project violates the technical independence

defendant had not disclosed the claimant's data to third parties. By 04.06.2019, the defendant had erased all data on "affinities for political parties"

of the claimed party, on March 22, 2022. Registration date March 28, June 2019. SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December

Act EU - 2nd DSAnpUG-EU) of 20 November 2019 (Federal Law Gazette I 1626, 1638) with effect from 26 November 2019. § Section 12 of the Federal Ministry of

Alongside the Data Protection Act (2018), in Cyprus there is also L. 44(I)/2019, which implemented the Directive (EU) 2016/680 on the protection of natural

November 2019, the Norwegian Data Protection Authority asked Sbanken for a statement. The bank explained its view in a letter dated 21 November 2019 and maintained

in particular Articles 20 et seq; Having regard to Decree No. 2019-536 of 29 May 2019 taken for the application of Law No. 78-17 of 6 January 1978 relating

3425/157/2019, 3578/157/2019, 3846/157/2019, 3871/157/2019, 3891/152/2019, 3918/157/2019, 4338/157/2019, 4666/154/2019, 5973/157/2019, 6773/157/2019 ja 7022/157/2019

740 m. Hansen/Struwe; KG MMR 2020, 239 m. Anm. Heldt, Ls. 5; Hacker, ZfPW 2019, 148 (184); Moos, in: Moos/Schefzig/Arning, Praxishdb. DSGVO, 2nd ed., ch

guardians' consent to establish of students' school accounts with Google. In 2019, Google changed the terms of use for G-Suite so that a number of additional

HDPA (Greece) - 47/2019 Authority: HDPA (Greece) Jurisdiction: Greece Relevant Law: Article 6 GDPR Article 21 GDPR Article 83 L. 4624/2019 (Data Protection

Started: Decided: 07.10.2019 Published: Fine: Reduced from 24,000 EUR to 22,000 EUR Parties: Forthnet National Case Number/Name: 36/2019 European Case Law Identifier:

Found Started: Decided: 25.03.2019 Published: 25.03.2019 Fine: 2000 EUR Parties: n/a National Case Number/Name: DELIBERAÇÃO/2019/222 European Case Law Identifier:

Started: Decided: 25.10.2019 Published: Fine: None Parties: Ergasias S.A National Case Number/Name: 39/2019 European Case Law Identifier: n/a Appeal: n/a Original

Started: Decided: 05.02.2019 Published: 05.02.2019 Fine: 20.000 EUR Parties: n/a National Case Number/Name: Deliberação 2019/21 European Case Law Identifier: Processo

Outcome: Upheld Started: Decided: 18.11.2019 Published: Fine: None Parties: Hospital National Case Number/Name: NAIH/2019/5112/15 European Case Law Identifier:

Upheld Started: Decided: 17. 12. 2019 Published: Fine: 2000 EUR Parties: Anonymous National Case Number/Name: 13/2019 European Case Law Identifier: n/a

GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: Violation Found Started: Decided: 24.10.2019 Published: 30.01.2020 Fine: 100,000 EUR Parties: Food craft company (unknown)

Upheld Started: Decided: 11.12.2019 Published: Fine: 1,500 EUR Parties: Public sector National Case Number/Name: NAIH/2019/5112/15 European Case Law Identifier:

Outcome: Upheld Started: Decided: 11.12.2019 Published: Fine: None Parties: n/a National Case Number/Name: 43/2019 European Case Law Identifier: n/a Appeal:

Started: Decided: 18.10.2019 Published: Fine: 20,000 EUR Parties: [ΠΛΕΓΜΑ ΝΕΤ Wind Hellas] National Case Number/Name: 38/2019 European Case Law Identifier:

the FPS did not comply. The data subject then filed a second complaint in 2019. The DPA found that the FPS had not established internal procedures in compliance

Started: Decided: 06.05.2019 Published: Fine: 107.000 EUR Parties: DECO PROTESTE Editores, Lda. National Case Number/Name: Deliberação 2019/297 European Case

AEPD (Spain) - PS/00012/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(f) GDPR Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld Started: Decided:

AEPD - PS/00337/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 21(1) GDPR Article 39 Organic 5/1985, of June 19 on the General

AEPD - TD/00306/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Type: Investigation Outcome: No further action Started: Decided: 4. 2. 2020

National Council on G 72-74/2019 shall be rejected.6 The remainder of the application of the Members of the Bundesrat on G 181-182/2019 shall be rejected. Reasons

AEPD - PS/00098/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 13 GDPR Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld Started: Decided: n/a Published:

Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto - 3425/157/2019 Authority: Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) Jurisdiction: Finland Relevant Law: Article 21 GDPR

AEPD - PS/00367/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(f) GDPR Article 83(5)(a) GDPR Article 58(2) GDPR Type: Complaint

AEPD - PS/00429/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 6(1) GDPR Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld Started: Decided: 04.03

AEPD - PS/00406/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(f) GDPR Article 83(5)(a) GDPR Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld

AEPD - PS/00293/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(c) GDPR Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld Started: Decided: Published:

AEPD - E/06179/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Article 34 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome:

AEPD - PS/00027/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(b) GDPR Article 83(5) GDPR Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld

AEPD - PS/00438/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 6(1)(a) GDPR Article 8(1) GDPR Article 13 GDPR Article 7 LOPDGDD

distraint upon the salary was sent to the complainant’s employer. On 2nd January 2019 the individual sent e-mail to the private bailiff with detailed explanation

bankruptcy took place on 27/07/2019 and that they became aware of it on 31/07/2019. The notification was made on 02/08/2019. The number of people affected

bankruptcy took place on 27/07/2019 and that they became aware of it on 31/07/2019. The notification was made on 02/08/2019. The number of people affected

technical and organisational security measures. See the updated decision 2019-441-1480 here. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a

Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto - 3846/157/2019 Authority: Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) Jurisdiction: Finland Relevant Law: Article 17 GDPR

AEPD - PS/00292/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(a) GDPR Article 6(1)(b) GDPR Article 83(2)(b) GDPR Article

invoice dated 30/04/2019. On 03/07/2019, a request for information is sent to TECSIBLE, not having received a reply. On 10/09/2019, it is verified in ***URL

safety at law firm Published 05-11-2019 Decision Private companies Journal number 2019-41-0026Agency Summary In 2019, the Danish Data Protectioncarried

- 2019-0878 Authority: EDPS Jurisdiction: European Union Relevant Law: Article 7 GDPR Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 Directive 2002/58/EC Type: Complaint Outcome:

notification requirements in the case of a personal data breach, 2019-441-1581 and 2019-441-1578. Both cases regarded insufficient access controls on a

AEPD - PS/00187/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 4(11) GDPR Article 5(1)(a) GDPR Article 6(1)(a) GDPR Article 83(5)(a)

Constitutional Court - 135/2019 Court: Constitutional Court (Belgium) Jurisdiction: Belgium Relevant Law: Article 23 GDPR PNR Directive 2016/681/EU API

HDPA (Greece) - 43/2019 Authority: HDPA (Greece) Jurisdiction: Greece Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(a) GDPR Article 5(2) GDPR Article 58(2)(c) GDPR Article

of investigation, E/01730/2019, as well as the documents supported by the claimed on July 15, 2019: FIRST: On 15 January 2019, when the claimant accesses

for processing on September 19, 2019.FOURTH: In relation to the research actions referenced with thecode E / 08848/2019, a new information request was sent

Please refer to the Spanish original for more details. Procedure Nº: E / 08452/2019 940-0419 RESOLUTION OF FILES OF ACTIONS Of the actions carried out by the

complaint filed by Mr. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) was filed on 14 June 2019 with the Spanish Data Protection Agency. The claim is directed against the

Bulgaria, held on 26.05.2019 г. The complainant claims that he has established the violation after an electronic inquiry made on 27 April 2019 at the Central Election

09.10.2019 Case number DSB-D130.073/0008-DSB/2019 Contestation before the BVwG/VwGH/VfGH This decision is final. Text GZ: DSB-D130.073/0008-DSB/2019 of 9

complainant's name. On July 11, 2019, Y Municipality issued an opinion on the case, which complaints on July 16, 2019 sent its comments to. 2.1. Y Municipality's

Please refer to the Spanish original for more details. Procedure No.: E/08205/2019 940-0419 TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS Of the actions carried out by the Spanish

Google My Business. The complainant was informed of this on 17 June 2019. On June 27, 2019, this Agency, through the support of the Electronic Notification

Technology and Civil Liberties) Decision n°MED-2019-025 of November 5, 2019 Decision n° MED 2019-025 of November 5, 2019 giving formal notice to the company BOUTIQUE

been set for 6 August 2019 and the final date for the submissions in response from the defendant for 26 August 2019. -On 21 August 2019, the Litigation Chamber

Spanish Data Protection Agency in Case E/07449/2019, and on the basis of the following FIRST:On 23/10/2019, the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency

been set for 6 August 2019 and the final date for the submissions in response from the defendant for 26 August 2019. -On 21 August 2019, the Litigation Chamber

: PS/00174/2019 RESOLUTION R/00585/2019 ON THE TERMINATION OF THE PROCEDURE BY VOLUNTARY PAYMENT In the sanctioning procedure PS/00174/2019, instructed

development and testing environment from another supplier. Journal number: 2019-431-0036 Summary In one specific case, the Data Inspectorate criticized the

following FACTS FIRST: Mrs. A.A.A. (*hereinafter, the claimant) on February 7, 2019 filed a claim before the Spanish Data Protection Agency, motivated by the

security (respectively, the Supervisory Authority's Nos. 2019-441-3399, 2019-441-4055 and 2019-441-4160). 1. Decision After a review of the cases, the Data

In a letter of 14 February 2019 to complaints, the Labor Market Holiday Fund stated that in the letter of 28 January 2019, the Fund's decision to place

protection. The audit was to be conducted from 29 July 2019 to 2 August 2019. By letter of [...] July 2019. (mark: [...]) Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych via

Decision MED-2019-027 of 12 November 2019 Print National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties Decision n°MED-2019-027 of November

to the Spanish original for more details. OEPD • Procedure No.: PS/00390/2019 RESOLUTION OF THE SANCTIONING PROCEDURE The procedure instituted by the Spanish

Spanish Data Protection Agency, made an appeal under Law TD/00127/2019 on 4 June 2019, to review the complaint made by A.A.A. and to invite the respondent