Search results
From GDPRhub
Did you mean: irish court decision
- Article 58 GDPR (section Decisions)the set time limit. Both decisions are under appeal. The ban was extended to the whole EU/EEA by a EDPB Urgent Binding Decision adopted under Article 6646 KB (5,825 words) - 11:12, 7 November 2023
- below € 75,000 the appel has to be brought in the Circuit Court, otherwise at the Irish High Court. Under Section 150(1) DPA 2018 a controller or processor8 KB (1,034 words) - 14:13, 20 August 2021
- Article 65 GDPR (section Decisions)annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU. As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory33 KB (4,185 words) - 16:09, 2 November 2023
- controller takes the decisions on the purposes and means for the relevant processing operations and has the power to have these decisions implemented. When55 KB (7,446 words) - 22:28, 1 April 2024
- account, the Court declared the Privacy Shield Decision to therefore be invalid. The Court also clarified that in the absence of an adequacy decision, the competent43 KB (5,641 words) - 14:58, 28 April 2022
- Article 88 GDPR (section Decisions)broad reading. Case law: In Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, the Court acknowledged that as the GDPR does not define the terms ‘employees’ and ‘employment’32 KB (3,228 words) - 13:32, 30 November 2023
- Article 14 GDPR (section Decisions)all related decisions in Category:Article 14 GDPR EDPB, ‘Binding decision 1/2021 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority47 KB (5,644 words) - 17:49, 5 March 2024
- CJEU - C-311/18 - Schrems II (redirect from CJEU - C-311/18 - Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems) (category Featured decisions)account, the Court declared the Privacy Shield Decision to therefore be invalid. The Court also clarified that in the absence of an adequacy decision, the competent12 KB (1,780 words) - 17:22, 10 March 2022
- establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions is to be considered to be the main125 KB (16,328 words) - 16:01, 8 March 2024
- How to add a new decision (section Authority or Court)the form: One for DPA Decisions (Data Protection Authorities) One for Court or Tribunal* Decisions One for CJEU Decisions (Court of Justice of the European17 KB (2,638 words) - 11:18, 19 February 2024
- 17/EN WP260 rev.01, 11 April 2018, p. 29 (available here). EDPB, DPA, Court decisions --> name of the authority, case + case number, name, date, parties,17 KB (2,510 words) - 13:56, 24 April 2023
- AEPD (Spain) (section Decision Database)announcing your intention to appeal. The Court will then request the file from the AEPD. The Court will contact you to submit your arguments. It may take4 KB (386 words) - 15:29, 3 September 2021
- appeals against decisions of the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). Appeals against decisions of the Upper Tribunal are heard in the Court of Appeal.18 KB (2,488 words) - 15:22, 14 December 2021
- confirms that the decision is not based on the EDPB guidelines, but on the GDPR. The reference to the grace period given by the Irish DPC is rejected by18 KB (2,375 words) - 16:17, 6 December 2023
- Delo, R (On the Application Of) v The Information Commissioner - 2023 EWCA Civ 1141 (redirect from Court Of Appeal (Civil Division) - 2023 EWCA Civ 1141) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)conclusive determination of the data subject’s complaint. The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the Commissioner had complied with all the obligations9 KB (1,191 words) - 08:44, 23 January 2024
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) (section Decision Database)fine is brought to the police who present the case in court. As such, appeals will go through the court system. Datatilsynet post the focus of their planned6 KB (605 words) - 14:08, 27 April 2021
- own motion. Appeals against decisions by the Italian Garante can be taken by the parties concerned before the civil court (Article 152 of the Code, which7 KB (808 words) - 08:17, 16 February 2023
- APD/GBA (Belgium) (section Decision Database)Council of State. For decisions given in French For decisions given in Dutch If you want to have a complete overview of the decisions given by the Belgian9 KB (993 words) - 07:10, 28 July 2022
- CNIL (France) (section Decision Database)highest administrative court (Conseil d'État). This applies to sanctions, guidelines or any decision of the authority. Decisions by the Conseil d'État are8 KB (824 words) - 22:52, 27 February 2024
- Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice8 KB (1,078 words) - 12:58, 10 May 2024
- Datatilsynet (Norway) (section Court)overturn decisions issued by the DPA, in part or in full. Their decisions are final under the administrative procedure, but can be appealed to the courts. Decisions10 KB (1,078 words) - 06:40, 26 March 2023
- Article 70 GDPR (section Decisions)(Article 64(2) GDPR); binding decisions under the dispute resolution procedure (Article 65 GDPR); and binding decisions where a supervisory authority has27 KB (3,038 words) - 12:19, 11 October 2023
- DSB (Austria) (section Decision Database)than 1.600 of their decisions in the Austrian decision database RIS.bka.gv.at since 1994. Not all decisions are published, only decisions that are novel or11 KB (1,468 words) - 13:27, 14 May 2023
- NAIH (Hungary) (section Decision Database)the NAIH decision shall be submitted to the authority itself within thirty days of its communication. Only attorney at law can act at the court on behalf7 KB (821 words) - 14:16, 7 March 2024
- LSA can refer a case to a national Court under certain circumstances. The Belgian DPA brought an action before Court of First Instance of Brussels, Belgium10 KB (1,311 words) - 15:26, 13 June 2023
- establishment has the power to enforce those decisions, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions shall be considered as the principal establishment42 KB (6,800 words) - 09:50, 10 September 2021
- IP (Slovenia) (section Decision Database)(ZVOP-1) are still valid and in use, which was confirmed also by some late court decisions. These are of course parts of 2007 ZVOP-1 which are not in contradiction10 KB (1,242 words) - 10:51, 6 February 2024
- HDPA (Greece) (section Decision Database)appeals/complaints were processed Fines: With 51 decisions fines of 30,060,00 euros were imposed Decisions: 67 Opinions: 5 Breach incidents: 175 were announced23 KB (2,039 words) - 08:15, 25 April 2024
- EDPB - Binding Decision 3/2022 - 'Meta (Facebook)' (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the Binding Decision. Please note: When describing Issues 1-3, it is necessary to explain the proposals in the Irish DPA’s Draft Decision, in order to53 KB (8,413 words) - 14:10, 30 January 2023
- DVI (Latvia) (section Decision Database)submission to the Director of the DVI. Furthermore, the decision issued by Director may be appealed to a court in accordance with the Law on Administrative Liability6 KB (544 words) - 04:39, 11 October 2022
- CNPD (Luxembourg) (section Decision Database)in this section! Decision and Opinions can be found on the CNPD's website here : https://cnpd.public.lu/en/decisions-avis.html. Decisions summarized on the10 KB (1,199 words) - 10:14, 19 October 2022
- Appeals against decisions are possible in the German administrative jurisdiction. Court of first instance is the district administration court (Verwaltungsgericht)4 KB (372 words) - 10:45, 22 September 2021
- UOOU (Czech Republic) (section Decision Database)section! The completed investigations can be found here. Decisions by the DPA can be found here. Decisions by the Head of the DPA can be found here. You can help5 KB (441 words) - 09:34, 17 September 2022
- responsible had his main place of business in Ireland, in accordance with Article 4 of the PGN. However, the Irish authority denied its competence, arguing11 KB (1,680 words) - 13:41, 13 December 2023
- applies to the decisions taken by the restricted committee, which are decisions of an administrative nature since they are sanction decisions which contribute120 KB (19,650 words) - 09:00, 6 April 2022
- the Irish Data Protection Commission (hereinafter “IE SA”) issued Decisions IN-18-5-5 and IN-18-5-7 (hereinafter “IE Decisions”). The IE Decisions found99 KB (14,431 words) - 16:20, 6 December 2023
- Article 55 GDPR (section Decisions)independence of their members or to weigh on their decisions. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 55 GDPR Hijmans, in Kuner, Bygrave35 KB (3,971 words) - 21:34, 1 April 2024
- Article 78 GDPR (section Decisions)annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU. As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory30 KB (3,874 words) - 10:46, 7 December 2023
- UOOU (Slovakia) (section Decision Database)make public issued decisions. There is no such obligation to do so in Slovak national law. If you want to access Slovak DPA decisions, you can consult the9 KB (1,006 words) - 07:13, 7 July 2021
- This question is the subject of case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The European Court of Justice (hereinafter CJEU) is well known, in131 KB (22,429 words) - 16:57, 12 December 2023
- Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2020/AR/1111 (category Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)X to lead to dereferencing.References to case-law decisions of the Court of Justice (which the Court ofmarkets does not question), justify the theory,37 KB (5,919 words) - 08:54, 20 August 2021
- UKUT (AAC) - Leave.EU and Eldon v Information Commissioner (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)was not satisfied; the decision to issue the assessment notices was lawful. These were grouped into four broad headings by the court, which in turn assessed11 KB (1,457 words) - 16:05, 3 December 2021
- establishment has the power to enforce those decisions, in which case the establishment which has taken such decisions shall be regarded as the principal establishment90 KB (14,556 words) - 17:08, 6 December 2023
- act as Concerned Supervisory Authorities (CSA) next to the Slovak DPA: Ireland (Irish Data Protection Commissioner -DPC), Sweden (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten17 KB (2,189 words) - 12:34, 3 August 2022
- that this articulation was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its PLANET49 decision of 1 October 2019 (C-613/17). In doing so, the93 KB (14,936 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
- DSB’s communications as decisions, this would mean that the BVwG would have to decide on the legality of a decision by the Irish DPC. In this context the67 KB (10,619 words) - 10:40, 22 January 2024
- --Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=32 KB (6,006 words) - 16:33, 7 July 2021
- --Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=34 KB (5,924 words) - 18:14, 20 April 2021
- EDPB - Binding Decision 4/2022 - 'Meta (Instagram)' (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the Binding Decision. Please note: When describing Issues 1-3, it is necessary to explain the proposals in the Irish DPA’s Draft Decision, in order to468 KB (51,340 words) - 14:10, 30 January 2023
- form of a common decision taken by two or more entities or result from converging decisions by two or more entities, where the decisions complement each127 KB (21,484 words) - 17:01, 12 December 2023
- that the Irish DPA was instead the competent authority under the one stop shop mechanism. Material competence of the French DPA This decision revolves82 KB (13,463 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- DPA forwarded the complaint to the Irish DPA as the main establishment of Facebook in Europe is in Ireland. The Irish DPC forwarded the complaint to Facebook11 KB (1,725 words) - 09:56, 12 November 2021
- referred a case to the Irish DPA regarding Facebook transfers of data to third parties. The Irish DPA rejected the case, since Ireland has not implemented17 KB (2,419 words) - 14:27, 24 November 2022
- Digitaliseringsstyrelsen - Decision against Google of 30 October 2023 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)of 16 The EU Court subsequently clarified in C-210/16 (Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein), that the fact that: ”[…] strategic decisions with regard52 KB (8,025 words) - 05:01, 23 November 2023
- Frankfurt am Main 8 März 2012 (highest regional court, second highest in German court system), the court considers a site where one can rank doctors according144 KB (23,058 words) - 18:48, 5 March 2022
- DPC - In the matter of Twitter International Company (IN-19-1-1) (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Having received submissions by Twitter, the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) proceeded to set out his provisional views as to whether, in notifying10 KB (1,404 words) - 07:47, 19 October 2021
- Deely v Information Commissioner (category High Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)appeal this decision at the Irish High Court, pursuant to section 42 of the 1997 Act. Did the High Court have the remit to address the decisions made by the3 KB (332 words) - 21:41, 11 April 2021
- Court of Appeal - 2020/123 (category Court of Appeal (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Act 1988. The DPC appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision. The Court decided that: 1. The data subject64 KB (9,589 words) - 16:15, 1 June 2022
- English original for more details. Adopted 1 Decision 01/2020 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding Twitter183 KB (30,819 words) - 09:50, 20 January 2023
- GDPR. This Binding Decision concerns the dispute arisen following a draft decision (hereinafter, “Draft Decision”) issued by the Irish supervisory authority276 KB (38,206 words) - 09:46, 20 January 2023
- this section! In Ireland the GDPR is implemented by the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA). You can help us fill this section! In Ireland, the age of digital2 KB (166 words) - 10:38, 11 September 2020
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9856694 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Guarantor in previous decisions (see provv.to 21/7/2022 n. 268, web doc. n. 9811271) finds confirmation in the ruling with which the Court of Cassation (see49 KB (7,758 words) - 15:44, 6 December 2023
- Datatilsynet (Norway) - 23-114365TVI-TOSL/08 and 23-114359TVI-TOSL/08 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)want to appeal the Court of Appeal's decision to the Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the appeal body for the Court of Appeal's decisions. Appeals to the113 KB (18,098 words) - 11:57, 13 September 2023
- contradictory. Conceptual decisions of the competent federal legislator must not be distorted or even undermined by decisions of a Land legislator based25 KB (3,847 words) - 12:32, 31 January 2022
- Rb. Amsterdam - C/13/702849 / HA ZA 21-526, C/13/706680 / HA ZA 21-789 and C/13/706842 / HA ZA 21-794 (section TikTok Ireland: jurisdiction under the GDPR)controller's establishment in Ireland. The Court added that the controller's argument that the right to bring proceedings before the Court of the data subject's92 KB (15,064 words) - 12:26, 28 June 2023
- purposes . These two decisions (hereinafter, collectively, the ‘IE SA Decisions’) were adopted on the basis of EDPB Binding Decisions 3/2022 and 4/2022,346 KB (48,181 words) - 16:39, 12 December 2023
- indeed fall within the material scope of the GDPR, a national court, including any referring court, is required to seek the precise source of the legal obligation82 KB (13,428 words) - 17:02, 6 December 2023
- plaintiff refers to the decision of the Irish data protection authority Y., the court is already not bound by such a decision and also does not share the63 KB (10,478 words) - 09:40, 15 February 2024
- Regional Court, order of 9 May 2019 - 18 W 523/19 -; Dres-den Higher Regional Court, order of 5 April 2019 - 3 W 286/19 -; Stuttgart District Court, loc.10 KB (1,476 words) - 15:55, 10 March 2022
- theEDPB decision(s) andfoundadmissible, theGeneral Court/CJEUhastheopportunitytoinvalidatethedecisionoftheEDPB.Inaddition,andiftheGeneralCourt/CJEU were289 KB (33,568 words) - 15:00, 1 February 2023
- Court of Appeal - (2021) IECA 53 (category Court of Appeal (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)private.” 136. The Supreme Court in Irish Times Ltd. v. Ireland [1998] 1 I.R. 359 recognised the inherent jurisdiction of the court to direct that a case be136 KB (23,256 words) - 13:47, 29 April 2021
- subject, represented by noyb, appealed this decision of the DPA to the administrative Court (hereafter the Court) to have the DPA's letter reversed or annulled58 KB (9,280 words) - 12:38, 28 June 2023
- DPC - Health Service Executive - August 2020 (IN-19-9-1) (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)patients’ personal data. Decision IN-19-9-1 was issued in August 2020 and Decision IN-19-9-2 was issued in September 2020. These decisions should be read in conjunction142 KB (23,134 words) - 15:51, 19 July 2021
- This decision concerns the use of plug-ins from social networks such as Facebook in websites. The court considered the question of joint controllers and6 KB (492 words) - 13:09, 1 June 2023
- DPC (Ireland) - IN-19-7-6 (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)accordance with the case- law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court of Justice’) and the European Court of Human Rights’”. (Emphasis added)513 KB (85,155 words) - 13:25, 8 July 2023
- action against that decision in court. The Circuit Court, High Court and Court of Appeal all dismissed his claims. However, the Supreme Court allowed an appeal6 KB (766 words) - 21:17, 5 March 2024
- precisely recourse to the Market Court", Court of Appeal Brussels, Market Court section, 19 th Chamber A, Market Court section, 2019/AR/741, 12 June 2019429 KB (58,279 words) - 09:12, 2 November 2022
- eu/sites/default/files/decisions/final_decision_-_in-19-1- 1_9.12.2020.pdf>. The DPC’s decision has been confirmed in the Dublin Circuit Court <https://www.dataprotection133 KB (19,309 words) - 05:16, 24 March 2023
- DPC (Ireland) - WhatsApp Ireland Limited - IN-18-12-2 (category DPC (Ireland)) (section Article 13(2)(f) – the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling)the extent to 1Decision 1/2021 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding WhatsApp Ireland under Article 65(1)(a)830 KB (115,261 words) - 15:37, 22 February 2022
- Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2022/AR/560 & 2022/AR/564 (category Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the case-law of the Brussels Court of Appeal, section Market Court." [free translation] 27. According to the Market Court case law referred to, the Disputes206 KB (30,485 words) - 09:54, 14 December 2023
- form of a common decision taken by two or more entities or result from converging decisions by two or more entities, where the decisions complement each104 KB (14,260 words) - 13:54, 9 June 2023
- establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions is to be considered to be the main162 KB (24,007 words) - 19:41, 15 February 2023
- companies brought an action against the decision before the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf, Germany (the Court). The Court referred to the CJEU for a preliminary8 KB (1,231 words) - 08:22, 6 July 2023
- (substantiated): 17 Datatilsynet's decisions upheld: 8 Datatilsynet's decisions amended or repealed: 8 Ratio of decisions changed: 47% Case processing time5 KB (427 words) - 15:48, 24 January 2022
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding131 KB (14,752 words) - 08:36, 5 July 2023
- cases, you agree that the claim must be heard in a court of competent jurisdiction in Ireland and that Irish law governs these Terms and all claims regardless30 KB (4,796 words) - 16:13, 10 March 2022
- cases to come to similar decisions in the EEA. Further decisions are expected soon. For details see here and here. Another decision was published by the French108 KB (17,097 words) - 13:52, 12 May 2023
- French DPA. One of these decisions was the Conseil's decision of 28 January 2022 (Societe GOOGLE LLC and Societe GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED). Territorial competence73 KB (11,864 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding113 KB (12,773 words) - 15:20, 6 December 2023
- establishment in the meaning of the Weltimmo decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter "the Court of Justice" or "the CJEU") (October76 KB (12,140 words) - 13:55, 28 February 2024
- to the electronic post office of the court. The electronic document must be suitable for processing by the court and provided with a qualified electronic37 KB (5,954 words) - 13:58, 22 June 2023
- submitting. COURT ORDERS Google shares with Lumen copies of court takedown orders it receives, both from U.S. domestic and foreign courts. As described390 KB (63,154 words) - 07:08, 9 June 2022
- means. 75 Subject to review by the referring court, in the present case, the file available to the Court shows that by integrating the 'Like' button from65 KB (9,767 words) - 16:22, 6 December 2023
- requires a decision by the appeal court (Section 543 Para. 2 No. 2 ZPO). The Senate deviates from the decision of the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court (loc.81 KB (13,415 words) - 09:47, 15 February 2024
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-431-0061 (Helsingor decision no. 2) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)of the European Court of Justice of 16 July 2020 in case C-311/18, Schrems II, paragraphs 101 and 105. [2] Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 1675 KB (11,733 words) - 16:33, 21 August 2022
- parallel, challenged the final decision before an Irish court and requested that the Court annul the contested decision in its entirety or, in the alternative8 KB (1,160 words) - 14:25, 15 December 2022
- an appeal on a point of law before the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), and the Court referred the following question for a preliminary6 KB (835 words) - 13:15, 1 June 2023
- Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/02136 (notification) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)subject for it to make informed decisions and understand what it is agreeing to. In our view, to be able to make informed decisions in the present case, the data77 KB (11,517 words) - 10:36, 22 October 2022
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9524194 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)2020, the Data Protection Commission (DPC), the Irish Supervisory Authority, has advised that Tik Tok Ireland may be considered a principal establishment within9 KB (1,280 words) - 15:53, 6 December 2023
- the Irish Data Protection Authority stated that Google The Irish Privacy Authority is the primary authority for AdWords. Furthermore, the Irish Data Protection27 KB (4,279 words) - 10:12, 17 November 2023
- means that the Dutch court has no jurisdiction in this case. The court will therefore decide accordingly. 4. The decision The court 4.1. declares that the18 KB (2,617 words) - 08:23, 2 September 2021
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding115 KB (12,842 words) - 08:38, 5 July 2023
- addition, the company states that, as accepted by the decision no. 3672/17-12-2013 of the Supreme Court of Appeal of Italy, interpreting and applying the E-Commerce37 KB (5,933 words) - 16:53, 19 April 2024
- UKSC - Richard Lloyd v Google LLC (2021) UKSC 50 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)39. By the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873, all the jurisdiction previously exercised by the Court of Chancery and the courts of common law was transferred169 KB (26,941 words) - 08:48, 25 November 2021
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding121 KB (13,722 words) - 15:16, 5 July 2023
- law. That there was a violation of Article 56 GDPR, according to which the Irish DPA is the only authority who can supervise Facebook’s processing activities13 KB (1,771 words) - 11:44, 10 September 2021
- law. That there was a violation of Article 56 GDPR, according to which the Irish DPA is the only authority who can supervise Facebook’s processing activities12 KB (1,766 words) - 11:44, 10 September 2021
- the administrative court. 3.2 Under Article 28(1) of the VwGVG, the Administrative Court must settle the case by way of a decision, unless the complaint107 KB (17,615 words) - 09:42, 10 September 2021
- Meanwhile postpone the decision for 7 more URLs until the data subject presents the required additional evidence and court decisions. The data subject submitted36 KB (5,761 words) - 17:19, 22 April 2024
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9788429 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)"one-stop-shop" mechanism. The Italian DPA acknowledged the Irish DPA’s position in its decision. However, the Italian DPA held the ePrivacy Directive to57 KB (9,084 words) - 15:11, 13 July 2022
- Viennese Civil Court (LGfZRS) has denied jurisdiction. The Higher Regional Court (OLG) has overturned the judgment and held that the Civil Court has jurisdiction5 KB (429 words) - 15:45, 10 March 2022
- the decision-making process and decisions of the Litigation Chamber, as well as due to the specificity and public interest present in this decision, it19 KB (2,707 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
- EFTA Court - Joined Cases E-11/19 and E-12/19 (category EFTA Court) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)GDPR. Adpublisher challenged both decisions before the BoA and requested that both decisions be set aside. The Court decided, pursuant to Article 39 of59 KB (8,242 words) - 10:47, 17 March 2021
- of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) appealed the judgment. Both the Swedish Administrative Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal of England and Wales8 KB (1,072 words) - 13:34, 11 August 2022
- processing could be relied on. The DPA also referred to a Spanish Supreme Court, second chamber, case STS 363/2017 of 15 February 2017, where it was noted28 KB (4,608 words) - 13:27, 13 December 2023
- ve appeal before the Contentious-administrative Chamber of the National Court, in accordance with the provisions of article 25 and section 5 of the fourth20 KB (3,052 words) - 08:17, 16 April 2024
- million people was exposed online. Following a routine sweep of Irish IP addresses, the Irish National Cyber Security Centre (CSIRT-IE) discovered the exposed50 KB (8,081 words) - 18:52, 5 March 2022
- OGH - 6Ob56/21k (request for preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)6Ob56 / 21k head The Supreme Court, as a court of appeal by the Senate President Hon.-Prof. Dr. Gitschthaler as chairman, the court councilors Univ.-Prof. Dr122 KB (20,253 words) - 08:17, 19 August 2021
- respond to DSARs, the court has the discretion whether or not to issue an order to make Lloyds comply and confirmed that the court would not have exercised3 KB (372 words) - 11:58, 29 November 2021
- Finland, Slovakia and Slovenia. This decision may be appealed against to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court within one month from the date of its37 KB (4,319 words) - 09:20, 17 November 2023
- national courts and the Court of Justice only the national court has the authority to interpret and apply the national legal provisions, while the Court of Justice49 KB (7,800 words) - 09:22, 5 January 2024
- has found no basis to postpone the case pending the European Court of Justice's decisions in the aforementioned cases. The Privacy Board had the following91 KB (14,440 words) - 10:06, 17 November 2023
- In the first decision by a German higher court on these facts, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm held that loss of control over personal data is not sufficient130 KB (21,874 words) - 09:43, 15 February 2024
- administrative and case law of the Court of Appeal of Brussels, section Court of Markets”. 27. The case law of the Markets Court to which reference is made requires207 KB (31,357 words) - 14:21, 8 June 2022
- importance of transparency in the decision-making process and the decisions of the Litigation Chamber, this decision will be published on the website of45 KB (6,780 words) - 16:57, 12 December 2023
- Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 of 12 July 2016 on the adequacy of the protection conferred by the EU US Privacy Shield. In this ruling, the Court considered83 KB (12,999 words) - 15:30, 6 March 2024
- to the Constitutional Court." 4. The application of the Federal Administrative Court in the case before the Constitutional Court 14 hof corresponds to202 KB (29,013 words) - 13:35, 12 January 2023
- Inspectorate's decision is reversed so that Sbanken is not ordered to change the spelling of A's name in its processing systems. The decision is unanimous26 KB (4,150 words) - 16:14, 6 December 2023
- In what is one of the first judicial decisions on the matter, a national court held that data transfer to the US in the context of Google Analytics was66 KB (9,990 words) - 12:30, 29 January 2024
- contained in court files where the courts are not 'public authorities' with environmental responsibilities. In February 2016, the High Court of Ireland delivered5 KB (450 words) - 14:12, 18 April 2024
- The High Court - 2021 IEHC 287 (category High Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)management of the school brought an application in the Irish Court seeking an order that Facebook Ireland, who owns Instagram, to disclose all data it holds6 KB (683 words) - 13:01, 17 August 2021
- API version 2. The court is of the opinion that Facebook Ireland has also violated its information obligation on this point. The court explains this as follows243 KB (40,160 words) - 11:54, 5 April 2023
- contended that the Court should declare Meta’s head of claim inadmissible and dismiss the action. The Court examined whether the contested decision complies with5 KB (619 words) - 12:37, 15 June 2023
- DPC - Tusla Child and Family Agency (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) fined Tusla (the Irish Child and Family Agency) €75000 for “unintentionally providing” the personal data of6 KB (761 words) - 21:06, 24 February 2021
- to pages that contain the words selected by the user. The European Union Court of Justice ruling of 13 May 2014, in paragraph 28, states that "when exploring17 KB (2,620 words) - 14:51, 13 December 2023
- Regional Court, Vienna, Austria) on 7 December 2020. The data subject therefore lodged an appeal with the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court). The latter12 KB (1,634 words) - 14:50, 30 April 2024
- considered that Google does have EU headquarters in Ireland, but that this Irish entity ‘did not have a decision making power’ in relation to the relevant cross-border20 KB (2,932 words) - 09:51, 10 September 2021
- Circuit Court - 2019/04546 (category Circuit Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Notwithstanding the CJEU's decision on Case C-300/21, an Irish Court held that compensation for non-material damage does not cover “mere upset”. However60 KB (9,004 words) - 09:39, 15 February 2024
- DPC (Ireland) - IN-20-8-1 (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Thus, the Irish DPA took the view that Meta Ireland acted in good faith when transferring data in lack of a proper legal basis. The Irish DPA also did7 KB (952 words) - 10:22, 24 May 2023
- Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 1198/161/2022 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)issued to the company. The decisions are not yet legally binding and can be appealed to the administrative court. Decisions of the Data Protection Commissioner13 KB (1,847 words) - 15:52, 11 December 2023
- See Holding for questions referred. Facts pending decision. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling: 1. Are the provisions of Article 6(1)(a) and (b)3 KB (353 words) - 11:49, 11 October 2021
- also reimburse the court fee paid by the claimant.DecisionThe court -declares the appeal well-founded;-annuls the contested decision;-determines that the22 KB (3,313 words) - 16:18, 26 January 2022
- the Tribunal (formerly the Court of first instance) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (formerly the European Court of Justice)/ Referenced jurisprudence246 KB (39,598 words) - 09:26, 24 April 2024
- with the CNIL’s decision and brought the issue before court. First, it claimed that, since there is cross-border processing, the Irish DPA (DPC) is the36 KB (5,595 words) - 16:12, 2 February 2022
- proceedings the Austrian DPA asked the Irish DPA whether the Irish entity was responsible for deletion requests which the Irish DPA denied, pointing to the US25 KB (3,905 words) - 14:45, 11 May 2022
- NIQB - Williams, Re Application for Judicial Review (2022) NIQB 12 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)standing. The court further observed that the question whether or not the data processing by the app is necessary has substance. However, the court did not deem3 KB (214 words) - 12:26, 2 March 2022
- (Markten Court section), X t. GBA, Judgment 2021/AR/320 of 7 July 2021, p. 24; Court of Appeal Brussels (Markten Court section), X t.GBA, Judgment 2020/AR/329350 KB (51,369 words) - 09:25, 31 January 2024
- of the Federal Court of Justice, correctly reproduced by the regional court (cf. in addition to the judgments listed by the regional court, also BGH GRUR118 KB (19,824 words) - 10:49, 6 February 2024
- ruling of the European Court of Justice, Case C-311/18, there was no U.S. adequacy decision at the material time. 49. This Decision does not require a more56 KB (8,616 words) - 15:31, 6 March 2024
- about the publication of decisions, in which it is stated that: “The Dispute Chamber is based on the principle that all its decisions, with few exceptions60 KB (9,281 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
- Automated individual decisions, including profiling: The accused states that she does not adopt automated individual decisions that may affect users58 KB (8,665 words) - 16:10, 1 February 2022
- and 52(1) of the Charter. Ireland appealed against that decision to the referring court, the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court stayed the proceedings and7 KB (988 words) - 11:55, 12 April 2022
- Schrems II decision? With regard to the Schrems II decision: The French Court outlined relevant segments in the the Schrems II CJEU decision. In this case51 KB (7,830 words) - 09:50, 29 October 2020
- the court held that this is irrelevant to the question whether an objection is valid or not. As a consequence, the court found that the decision of the10 KB (1,278 words) - 08:39, 15 November 2023
- CNIL (France) - Deliberation SAN-2022-024 of December 20, 2022 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)in its AMAZON EUROPE CORE decision of June 27, 2022, the Board of State recalled that "it follows from the case law of the Court of Justice of the European73 KB (11,822 words) - 11:58, 11 January 2023
- originates if it is not collected from the registered occurrence of automatic decisions, including profiling, as referred to in Article 22 (2). 1 and 4, and at33 KB (5,189 words) - 16:23, 6 December 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9808698 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)recalled that the Court of Justice of the European Union, with ruling C-311/18, of 16 July 2020 (so-called Schrems II), in declaring the decision of the EU Commission91 KB (15,011 words) - 09:00, 5 October 2022
- ANSPDCP (Romania) - National Consumer Protection Authority (ANPC) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)details. 10.07.2023 Court decision - ANPC - WhatsApp In the litigation currently pending, the court of first instance (Bucharest Municipal Court) upheld the minutes6 KB (672 words) - 11:15, 4 October 2023
- ve appeal before the Contentious-administrative Chamber of the National Court, in accordance with the provisions of article 25 and section 5 of the fourth26 KB (3,971 words) - 13:26, 13 December 2023
- Regional Court as the competent court for the claim to be brought by the applicant in this matter; in the eventu, to designate another regional court for civil9 KB (1,188 words) - 09:35, 26 November 2021
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9782890 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)that can be enforced before the courts. In the same judgment, the Court also upheld the validity of Commission Decision 2010/87/EC of 5 February 2010 concerning47 KB (7,604 words) - 07:01, 20 July 2022
- appealed the decision of the lower court. The Higher Regional Court Munich (Oberlandesgericht München) overturned the decision of the lower court and dismissed22 KB (3,418 words) - 10:28, 14 November 2022
- Article 6(1)(b) GDPR. The Higher Regional Court Munchen found the following: The Court found that the Regional Court had correctly assumed that the policy59 KB (9,846 words) - 14:03, 20 September 2021
- that person. In the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, the Court held that the information requested by42 KB (4,784 words) - 08:22, 20 October 2022
- letter dated September 30, 2021 (Appendix B 16). 8th In a decision dated November 25, 2022, the Irish data protection authority DPC imposed a fine of EUR 26526 KB (4,101 words) - 10:24, 13 March 2024
- litigation before the Contentious-Administrative Chamber of the National High Court, in accordance with the provisions of article 25 and section 5 of the fourth28 KB (4,527 words) - 12:35, 13 December 2023
- High Court (Queen's Bench Division) Decisions You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Queen's Bench Division) Decisions >> Soriano108 KB (18,178 words) - 11:57, 29 November 2021
- that applies to it. 32. Pursuant to Decision No. 1/2003 of the Supreme Court of Justice, the authority is not required to administrative than in the “accusation”163 KB (27,222 words) - 16:54, 6 December 2023
- EWCA (UK) - WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc v Various Claimants (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Bellman questioned Mr Major's decisions, he (Major) punched him (Bellman), causing brain damage. It was held by this Court, reversing the trial judge, that87 KB (14,773 words) - 09:28, 1 March 2022
- displayed in the tools. The court of appeal confirmed the principle of the judgement of the court of first instance. The court rejected the applications127 KB (21,056 words) - 08:17, 19 August 2021
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9806053 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)recalled that the Court of Justice of the European Union, with ruling C-311/18, of 16 July 2020 (so-called Schrems II), in declaring the decision of the EU Commission91 KB (14,906 words) - 14:39, 5 October 2022
- ICO - Monetary Penalty on Ticketmaster UK Limited (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)9.2 In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the penalty can be enforced130 KB (21,195 words) - 13:52, 25 April 2021
- individuals, the Court considered that the level of protection in this context could not be regarded as manifestly inadequate. The Court therefore considered26 KB (3,744 words) - 16:36, 10 August 2021
- combining, shielding, erasing or destroying data ”. Decision on the merits 24/2021 - 9/44 29. The Court of Justice has repeatedly confirmed in its case law110 KB (18,238 words) - 16:56, 12 December 2023
- Higher Regional Court, Berlin, then to the Federal Court of Justice, which sought a preliminary reference ruling from the Court of Justice. The Advocate General4 KB (376 words) - 09:23, 23 February 2024
- Defendant Litigants: the Rostock Regional Court - 3rd Civil Chamber - by the Vice-President of the Regional Court as single judge on the basis of the oral103 KB (16,959 words) - 13:58, 20 September 2021
- employee. The Celle Higher Regional Court rejected her claim and then she referred to the Federal Constitutional Court. The Court decided for the first time that127 KB (21,367 words) - 16:00, 22 March 2022
- but they are not binding for the court (Federal Court of Justice, decision of 08.10.2012 - X ZR 110/11). The court can proceed to determine the relevant66 KB (11,183 words) - 09:28, 12 July 2023
- for this. The Court of Audit has established that BZ risks are focus areas governance, organization design and risk management General Court of Audit held179 KB (22,957 words) - 17:07, 12 December 2023
- Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 13, 2012, overturned the judgment of the Higher Regional Court, amended the judgment of the Regional Court and133 KB (21,944 words) - 15:59, 22 March 2022
- The Regional Court of Munich awarded a data subject €100 in damages after a controller unlawfully transferred their IP address to Google LLC via the use12 KB (1,837 words) - 17:35, 23 February 2022
- aforementioned treatment. Regarding proportionality, the Constitutional Court has indicated in the Judgment 207/1996 that it is "a common and constant79 KB (12,680 words) - 17:31, 8 February 2022
- the District Court’s judgment. 2. Each of the parties carries its own costs in the District Court and in the Court of Appeal.” (10) The Court of Appeal found77 KB (12,671 words) - 06:13, 6 March 2022
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty41 KB (5,879 words) - 12:39, 23 March 2022
- upon referral. According to the Court, “the fact that an en the same judge sits in two formations [of the General Court] which successively taken note of88 KB (13,264 words) - 09:09, 29 June 2022
- depositing the cookies. Amazon appealed this decision at the Conseil d'Etat, the French Supreme Administrative Court, and requested its annulment. Amazon also51 KB (8,228 words) - 17:33, 11 January 2023
- the registry of this court of appeal on July 21, 2021, [appellant] requested the court of appeal to cancel the decision of the court of Zeeland-West-Brabant54 KB (9,028 words) - 11:38, 23 February 2022
- recalls that in its Planet49 judgment of 1 October 2019 (case C-673/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union indicated that a consent collected by means59 KB (8,323 words) - 11:51, 31 August 2022
- will issue the decision to the defendant to transfer . After all, the Disputes Chamber has decided to dismiss its decisions 6Cf. Court of Justice EU, judgment20 KB (2,838 words) - 06:45, 20 September 2023
- The court further decided that the HKR must delete the personal data of the data subject after the request for access has been fulfilled. The court took115 KB (18,479 words) - 16:31, 25 January 2023
- section 3.2.2, point B.5., p. 15. 7cf. Court of Justice EU, Judgment of 16 July 2020, DPC v. Facebook Ireland & Maximillian Schrems, C-311/18, para. 11220 KB (2,909 words) - 06:45, 14 September 2023
- The Court stressed the plaintiff rightly had pointed out that according to the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Federal Court of Justice58 KB (9,657 words) - 14:01, 20 September 2021
- damage from that person before the courts, is a legitimate interest is". 81. On the basis of the case law of the Court of Justice and the guidelines of the84 KB (14,035 words) - 16:56, 12 December 2023
- which the court of appeals deviated from the established decision-making practice of the Court of Appeal or which in decision-making of the Court of Appeal103 KB (16,947 words) - 08:34, 24 April 2024
- is based on the above-mentioned decisions of the CJEU. "Decisions can be considered to coincide with respect to purposes and means if they complement each64 KB (10,160 words) - 13:24, 27 July 2022
- purpose of exchange scores. cc This result is not based on the decision of the Federal Court of Justice dated 10.11.2022 (Az. I ZR 186/17 - App-Zentrum) took65 KB (9,647 words) - 11:40, 4 October 2023
- in previous decisions, this analysis should necessarily be called into question because of legal developments subsequent to said decisions. The Conseil28 KB (4,287 words) - 09:20, 23 February 2024
- CJEU - C-205/21 - Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. Costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs110 KB (18,000 words) - 08:01, 5 June 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9703988 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)rights that can be enforced in court against the US authorities. The Court also examined the validity of the Commission Decision of 5 February 2010 relating222 KB (35,993 words) - 09:52, 20 October 2021
- law of the European Court of Human Rights that expression enjoys protection regardless of its content, cf. Murphy's case against Ireland of 10 July 2003 (RJD26 KB (4,068 words) - 10:39, 7 December 2021
- The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court: District Court Frankfurt25 KB (4,111 words) - 12:57, 8 September 2021
- the Federal Administrative Court, followed by a statement and the administrative file. II. The Federal Administrative Court considered: 1. Findings: 128 KB (4,409 words) - 09:54, 25 April 2023
- Spenle Presiding Judge at the Higher Regional Court Judge at the Higher Regional Court Judge at the district court Permalink: https://openjur.de/u/2452377.html75 KB (12,567 words) - 10:37, 14 November 2022
- Administrative Court Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 24 September 2019, G.C. and others, C-136/17, paragraph 46. 16See previous decision, p. 23.Data96 KB (12,267 words) - 11:43, 7 April 2022
- Convention. (2) A court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action to which this section applies unless the court is satisfied that, of122 KB (20,830 words) - 10:42, 12 January 2022
- Dutch-speaking Court of First Instance of Brussels already ruled that the predecessor of the GBA had jurisdiction to bring an action before the court "insofar107 KB (17,697 words) - 16:52, 12 December 2023
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty31 KB (4,210 words) - 15:26, 20 June 2023
- Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 7732/161/23 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Commissioner vs Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (hereinafter Schrems II), paragraphs 90 –121). Following the judgment of the European Court of Justice in32 KB (4,844 words) - 11:44, 11 October 2023
- the criminal sections of the Supreme Court of Justice cannot be qualified as administrative bodies, since this Court is unequivocally a body of a judicial233 KB (37,080 words) - 20:01, 31 March 2021
- Rb. Midden-Nederland - UTR 19 /1761 and UTR 19/1627 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)law is reserved to the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court of Justice), the Court submits this question to the Court of Justice. 3. In the36 KB (5,806 words) - 08:45, 8 September 2021
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9771142 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)April 2019, which refer in full to the pleadings submitted to the Civil Court of Rome, in opposition to the Garante's order, in which the party has, in31 KB (5,020 words) - 11:07, 1 June 2022
- Basic Law ) in decision No. 7 of 1996, which precedes the adoption of the LPPD and the case-law of the court, the Constitutional Court outlines the scope91 KB (14,896 words) - 17:02, 7 March 2022
- As this decision has been adopted pursuant to Article 56 and Chapter VII GDPR, the present decision may be appealed before Oslo District Court (“Oslo tingrett”)69 KB (10,520 words) - 07:55, 10 August 2023
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty32 KB (5,066 words) - 09:04, 14 February 2022
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty38 KB (4,984 words) - 23:21, 29 January 2021
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty39 KB (5,404 words) - 11:56, 21 September 2021
- consent, version 1.1., adopted on 4 May 2020. [3] See also the decision of the European Court of Justice of 29 July 2019, Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale28 KB (4,202 words) - 17:23, 22 November 2022
- agree and brought the action before court. On 18/02/2021, the Regional Court Berlin overturned the DPA’s decision because it held that a legal entity cannot38 KB (5,956 words) - 11:41, 21 January 2022
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty42 KB (5,271 words) - 13:44, 23 June 2021
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty40 KB (5,684 words) - 18:42, 16 February 2022
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty41 KB (5,743 words) - 11:44, 21 September 2021
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable byrder of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty43 KB (5,548 words) - 10:45, 28 July 2021
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable byOrder of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty48 KB (6,084 words) - 16:29, 25 January 2022
- litigation before the Administrative Litigation Chamber of the National Court, in accordance with the provisions of article 25 and section 5 of the fourth34 KB (5,141 words) - 09:28, 8 March 2024
- ICO (UK) - Enforcement Notice and Warning Letter - Home Office (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)service: “Decisions about an individual’s access to a product, service, opportunity or benefit that is based to any extent on automated decision-making (including129 KB (17,281 words) - 14:57, 10 April 2024
- Bankruptcy Court order produces legal results in Greece, nor does the audited company AMPNI claim such nor does it produce a Greek court decision recognizing127 KB (21,184 words) - 15:39, 6 December 2023
- of Personal Data and of theits interpretation by the National Court itself and the Court of Justice of the European Union;2nd violation of article 3 of48 KB (7,584 words) - 12:55, 16 September 2021
- establishment has the power to enforce such decisions, in in which case the establishment that has adopted such decisions will be considered main establishment115 KB (18,312 words) - 11:58, 16 March 2022
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty50 KB (6,389 words) - 10:14, 9 February 2022
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty41 KB (6,563 words) - 15:07, 14 July 2021
- 70. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the penalty can be enforced55 KB (6,916 words) - 07:27, 26 October 2021
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable byOrder of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty54 KB (6,922 words) - 11:45, 16 June 2021
- ICO (UK) - The Central Young Men’s Christian Association (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)101. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the penalty can be enforced54 KB (7,579 words) - 16:44, 7 May 2024
- Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 2206/171/20 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Administrative Court. Service The decision is notified in accordance with § 60 of the Administrative Act (434/2003) by mail against receipt. The decision is not51 KB (7,788 words) - 07:42, 29 March 2023
- Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems 5 «The starting point will be that decisions by the Data Inspectorate and the53 KB (7,990 words) - 08:37, 6 October 2021
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the monetary penalty63 KB (8,280 words) - 14:53, 2 March 2022
- The 60 exfiltrated court bundles included 15 relating to criminal court proceedings and 45 civil proceedings. Of the 60 exfiltrated court bundles, the personal87 KB (10,588 words) - 14:32, 16 March 2022
- 80. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the penalty can be enforced58 KB (7,695 words) - 09:00, 28 July 2021
- from legal fees for the out-of-court activity in the amount of EUR 597.74 and for obtaining the cover note for the court proceedings in the amount of EUR66 KB (10,899 words) - 08:33, 8 September 2021
- Main Regional Court on September 30, 2021 (see page 96 of the file). The Darmstadt Regional Court then declared itself incompetent by decision of October70 KB (11,309 words) - 14:37, 21 December 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9909907 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)with the ordinary court of the place where the owner of the processing of personal data has his residence, or, alternatively, with the court of the place of122 KB (19,640 words) - 08:16, 3 August 2023
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In 36 • ICO. Information Commissioner's72 KB (8,623 words) - 10:38, 26 May 2021
- the day you received the decision. If the appeal has been received In due course, IMY forwards it to the Administrative Court in Stockholm for consideration65 KB (7,759 words) - 10:10, 30 April 2024
- ICO (UK) - Monetary Penalty Notice to Easylife Limited (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)116. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. In Scotland, the penalty can be enforced77 KB (9,347 words) - 07:39, 13 October 2022
- 4 of the CECE and judgments of the Court of Justice (ChamberFourth) of June 5, 2019 and June 13, 2019) of the Court of Justice of theEU (CJEU).3. The user206 KB (32,869 words) - 14:36, 13 December 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9685994 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)retention times for telephone communications, the company stated that "these decisions are not taken by Deliveroo Italy but by the UK parent company" (see minutes235 KB (38,572 words) - 10:19, 20 July 2022
- Pursuant to Article 108, § 1 of the LCA, this decision may be appealed to the Court of Markets (Brussels Court of Appeal) within 30 days of its notification92 KB (13,989 words) - 14:56, 3 February 2022
- the day the decision was announced. If the appeal has been received in due time the Data Inspectorate forwards it to the Administrative Court in Stockholm59 KB (8,959 words) - 11:43, 7 April 2022
- requests a substantive decision by the Administrative Court with regard to point A)II. Since a decision of the Administrative Court based on Section 42 para92 KB (15,327 words) - 08:27, 10 May 2024
- In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the monetary penalty is recoverable by Order of the County Court or the High Court. Scotland, the monetary penalty79 KB (10,566 words) - 10:48, 7 December 2021